Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Arielle Free turns up to Dance Anthems drunk


xxladybarefootxx

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, BBCAaron said:

I think it wasn’t a proper dig it didn’t seem like an intentional offence might bit sticking your foot into it. But think Arielle was just saying honestly what she thought about the song which I mean at the radio 1’s dance weekend the playlist should be set to a higher bar than that Barney horse girl thing. All Charlie had to do was mute the mics and play the music. She’ didn’t have to address anything on air. 

Charlie did rise and give lip back on air and needed to respect a difference of an opinion. Presenters need to be able to say if they find a song sounds bad. As there’s definately needs to step things up a bit.

I think there are two things here.

 

1. Should Charlie have responded?  I don't know but I know that when things are happening live any of us can respond.  The important thing is that Charlie moved on very quickly.

2. This simply isn't about Arielle's opinion.  She was that drunk friend being a pain in the butt but live on one of Europe's biggest radio station.  Had she been sober (a) she probably wouldn't have crossed that line of criticising the choice of a fellow presenter live on air and (b) it wouldn't have been expressed that way.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, xxladybarefootxx said:

I’m intrigued, what happened with Lisa I’anson? 

Googled it so might save you a search think a bit of a no-show situation. I never heard of her before a minute ago. https://www.theguardian.com/music/2011/jun/15/lisa-anson-sacked-after-ibiza

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AndyK77 said:

I think there are two things here.

 

1. Should Charlie have responded?  I don't know but I know that when things are happening live any of us can respond.  The important thing is that Charlie moved on very quickly.

2. This simply isn't about Arielle's opinion.  She was that drunk friend being a pain in the butt but live on one of Europe's biggest radio station.  Had she been sober (a) she probably wouldn't have crossed that line of criticising the choice of a fellow presenter live on air and (b) it wouldn't have been expressed that way.

 

 

I think the point of had she been sober and said the same things and that wouldn’t been a problem. Then thats no problem I think she could’ve taken it on the chin and once sober up can just move on from it. She wasn’t that much of a pain in a butt like it or loathe it. It will just look a bit sterile to be concerned with presenter looking like a drunken friend. She didn’t criticise Charlie in a personal choice. She could’ve done much better than playing crap and think presenters should be able to say what they think about song choices. I think for Europe’s biggest radio station could be playing top rate songs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Old Codger Fan said:

Just tracked back on this thread to hear the actual incident.

Pretty entertaining radio, albeit in a way nobody would plan for.

Weird shift of attitude from the host - it's all welcome fun until the moment that she gets criticised - then all of a sudden it's the worst thing in the world.

I think Arielle took it too far and as Charlie rightfully said it was a lack of respect to her. Charlie's shift of attitude was fair enough, it became less of a joke and more of a criticism of her music choices - I didn't find arielle's joke funny in the slightest and clearly neither did Charlie and I respect her for standing up for herself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, AndyK77 said:

This story indicates a bit more of the background 

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/11035428/bbc-heads-will-roll-after-dj-pulled-off-air/

 

It seems to suggest that Charlie didn't really want Arielle on air in that condition.

If Charlie was persuaded to let her on in the first place, against her better judgment, then that does put things in a different light ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, brucard said:

I think Arielle took it too far and as Charlie rightfully said it was a lack of respect to her. Charlie's shift of attitude was fair enough, it became less of a joke and more of a criticism of her music choices - I didn't find arielle's joke funny in the slightest and clearly neither did Charlie and I respect her for standing up for herself.

It wasn’t a joke. Arielle was just expressing her opinion about the music choices which she was right about and should be able to speak about it. If presenters can’t share their opinions like that radio 1 and even Charlie needs to lighten up and take things on the chin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BBCAaron said:

It wasn’t a joke. Arielle was just expressing her opinion about the music choices which she was right about and should be able to speak about it. If presenters can’t share their opinions like that radio 1 and even Charlie needs to lighten up and take things on the chin.

I doubt was a proper opinion. She was out of it .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also old enough to remember the Lisa L'anson thing, that was far bigger than this.

I don't mind this really, it's a small telling off and move on. Radio 1 has been ever since I've listened, too nicey nicey at times. Now more than ever. That's why I loved when Moyles for instance back in the day basically said what he thought sometimes about a song. It was entertaining.

No chance in hell every DJ loves every song on the playlist. Not everything is brilliant to everyone as its portrayed on air sometimes. Not saying slag tunes off every show, but if there's something you just don't get the appeal of it makes good radio to say what you think.

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, anothernerd said:

I doubt was a proper opinion. She was out of it .

And how she went about it.

"Sorry, still not sold on that one" would be fine.  It was a drunken rant made a bit personal.  As I said earlier in the thread - the PITA drunk friend that is starting to annoy you on a night out.

To repeat - if it's only what happened on-air it's a straightforward wrist slap and that's it gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, AndyK77 said:

And how she went about it.

"Sorry, still not sold on that one" would be fine.  It was a drunken rant made a bit personal.  As I said earlier in the thread - the PITA drunk friend that is starting to annoy you on a night out.

To repeat - if it's only what happened on-air it's a straightforward wrist slap and that's it gone.

Stop speculating it wasn't personal a presenter is allowed to not be sold on that one and shouldn’t have to watch their mouth on that one Charlie shouldve taken it on the chin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BBCAaron said:

Stop speculating it wasn't personal a presenter is allowed to not be sold on that one and shouldn’t have to watch their mouth on that one Charlie shouldve taken it on the chin.

But it was personal!  

"Sorry not sold on that one" isn't personal.

The whole "I thought better of you" and about to go on about it is personal.

In the workplace there is a professional way of expressing an opinion and an unprofessional one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, AndyK77 said:

But it was personal!  

"Sorry not sold on that one" isn't personal.

The whole "I thought better of you" and about to go on about it is personal.

In the workplace there is a professional way of expressing an opinion and an unprofessional one.

Completely agree - it was an unprofessional way to express her opinion and Charlie had every right to react the way she did. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, brucard said:

Completely agree - it was an unprofessional way to express her opinion and Charlie had every right to react the way she did. 

If you think it’s unprofessional to express an opinion you might as well to ask the BBC to sack the lot and churn out artificial intelligence programmed radio shows. It’s a music station an entertainment one and presenters are allowed to express opinions on the music they play is it unprofessional for Jack Saunders or Clara Amfo to express a positive opinion on a song or it’s only the bad ones.

If you can’t say you’d expect to hear some better music, as all she was saying she’d expect Charlie to be playing better music than that horse girl song. What can she say? Charlie just needs to loosen up and not to make a thing about it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally still think it was the way it was said rather than what was said.  To show up drunk is unprofessional, and to interrupt and disrespect a colleague while they are trying to present a show is rude.

Scott used to champion some awfully questionable pop songs, just for the fun of it. Rebecca Black - Friday being one example. It was a terrible song, but it was a laugh.   Chris would also often throw subtle shade at Scott's bangers choices, so negative opinions on songs are definitely allowed, but I think Arielle's tone was out of order and brought down the mood of what Charlie was trying to make an uplifting dance show and a cheesey fun song that she wanted to play.

Even Zane Lowe respected Scott's love for cheesey pop so much that he had a hand in the whole playing out the entire Britney album stunt, I'm sure that music wasn't to Zane's taste, but then nobody was asking him to play it on his show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BBCAaron said:

If you think it’s unprofessional to express an opinion you might as well to ask the BBC to sack the lot and churn out artificial intelligence programmed radio shows. It’s a music station an entertainment one and presenters are allowed to express opinions on the music they play is it unprofessional for Jack Saunders or Clara Amfo to express a positive opinion on a song or it’s only the bad ones.

If you can’t say you’d expect to hear some better music, as all she was saying she’d expect Charlie to be playing better music than that horse girl song. What can she say? Charlie just needs to loosen up and not to make a thing about it.

 

I see what you're saying - of course we all have our right to an opinion and so does Arielle but it was more about the way she said it rather than what she said as ladybarefoot posted above. It came across as rude/disrespectful and that's why I feel quite strongly about this.

Also to say Charlie should loosen up and not make a thing about it is a bit unfair imo. Charlie can feel however she likes - no one can tell her otherwise as that's her feelings and she's entitled to them. If she felt offended etc then that's her right, you may disagree but no one can tell her how to feel/react.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, brucard said:

I see what you're saying - of course we all have our right to an opinion and so does Arielle but it was more about the way she said it rather than what she said as ladybarefoot posted above. It came across as rude/disrespectful and that's why I feel quite strongly about this.

Also to say Charlie should loosen up and not make a thing about it is a bit unfair imo. Charlie can feel however she likes - no one can tell her otherwise as that's her feelings and she's entitled to them. If she felt offended etc then that's her right, you may disagree but no one can tell her how to feel/react.

She’s an autonomous being so no one can tell her how to feel or react thats nature of being human. But you got to be able to take a bit of honesty and make sure people can talk honestly to you. Charlie did over react. If she didn’t brush things of it kind of adds to the drama and conflict that needs to move forward. It wasn’t that disrespectful and not expected to be nicey nicey all the time. Atleast Arielle wasn’t faking anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Since Easter at the beginning of April, Vick, Katie and Jamie have been on together just 4 times. Which is crazy for a brand new, high profile Radio 1 show. Imagine Jordan being off that regularly on Capital because of ‘other commitments’ - would never happen.  Jamie has only presented 6 times in the past month. Katie has presented every single show. Given how she got the job at the last minute I think very likely she would have had other commitments, which she will have cancelled/rearranged, cos being Radio 1 drive time host is a massive gig.   Vick, Katie and Jamie - 4 times; Vick and Katie - 10 times; Katie and Jamie - 2 times; Katie and Lauren - 2 times. 
    • I see Katie (and Mairead) were out with Jordan tonight.  I don’t listen to the show any longer, I am shocked they are allowed to mention Jordan.
    • At least I do not ask stupid questions…😂
    • I suggest you follow the other DJs too if so, you will learn the hardest working will go further 🤣
    • A simple check on his instagram would answer all your questions , he’s on tour with his wife and the team behind his podcast. I suggest anyone to follow the radio presenters, you will learn a lot about their other jobs and work commitments. 
    • Where is Jamie? It felt like he was settling in when Vick wasn’t on but he’s not been on since last Tuesday now. They’ve not even mentioned him, in fact they’ve mentioned Jordan more than they’ve mentioned him in the last two days.
    • Scott's show is on the road next week, live from Malmö in Sweden on Wednesday and Friday, ahead of Eurovision. As he's doing the semi final coverage on the TV on Tuesday and Thursday alongside Rylan, Gary Davies sits in for him on those days.
    • I don't feel there's so much overlap between M&M and Scott's shows. M&M is of a similar calibre to Scott & Chris on R1, with genuine laugh out loud moments and usually a show packed full of real interesting content. Scott's R2 show is IMO a shadow of the stuff he did on R1 (not his fault, he's doing exactly what station management want), with music and content to appeal to a much older audience.
    • To be fair, Scott & Chris would've still been fine on Radio 1. It was mentioned at the time that Scott's move was very much on Radio 2's part rather than Radio 1 wanting to move them on. That's the one problem that Radio 2 has, trying to appeal to such a wide demographic.. it's the perfect listen for many, but equally a turn off for many others. I think they have the balance fairly right.     
    • I agree Scott has always been a good standalone presenter, but always better when with someone. When chappers left the radio one show it felt a different show and Chris joining was what it needed and brought new life. for the format of the radio 2 show Scott’s show fits well with the station but again, there’s the huge gap between radio1 and 2 As been said already old radio2 listeners feel it now feels too young with latest changes, yet old radio1 listeners still feel radio 2 feels too old. The inbetween stage demographic of too old for radio 1 but too young for radio 2 is still not catered for radio 2 was left to grow old with its audience for too long and to change things up now feels to try and change a brand image the right thing to do is leave it as it is and cater for that 1.5 demographic which I’m sure the new proposed 00s and 10s station will do if approved. Problem is it’s so overdue that by the time it gets off the ground these listeners are already likely to be lost and the changing image of radio2 likely to lose what it stands for as a brand with the “it’s too young now “  moving to boom and the “ it still sounds old “ crowd not able to move with their favourite presenters like Scott so finding themself on capital a radio 1.5 would have been perfect for Scott and Chris, seems unlikely but this is why I think who branding of bbc radio needs a rethink if these new stations get off ground
    • Bank Holiday Monday Schedule 6am-10am: Arielle Free in for Greg 10am-2pm: Dean & Vicky (No Rickie, Melvin & Charlie) 2pm-6pm: Vick & Jamie (No Katie) 6pm onwards: As normal.
    • Dare I say they've sounded great this past week?  Very much gelling.  Maybe less pressure?  Seem to be having a genuinely good time and not forcing things.
    • I'm in the minority in my workplace, most of them love country music.  Me, the American, does not care for it.  That said, I haven't haaaaaated some of the country adjacent stuff that's been on the R1 playlist.  
    • The Eurovision semi finals are on from 8 to 10pm on Tuesday 7th and Thursday 9th May with Richie Anderson. That means Sara Cox in on till 8 on those days.  Saturday 11th May is Eurovision 'Super Saturday... 1-3pm Your Ultimate Abba song with Gary Davies  3-6pm Michelle Visage's Eurovision All Stars 6-8pm Eurovision Request Party with Owain Wynn Evans 8pm Eurovision Grand Final with Scott Mills and Rylan Clark  
×
×
  • Create New...