Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

iPad


E*F*4L

Recommended Posts

the new Apple iPad looks & sounds :D

apple-tablet-keynote_049.jpg

“iPad is powered by our own custom silicon. Our own chip. It’s called the A4, and it screams.†1GHz. 16, 32, or 64GB of flash storage. “It’s got the latest in wireless: 802.11n, WiFi, and Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR, accelerometer, compass, speaker, mic, dock connector. And it’s got battery. (10 hours)

it will start at $499 for the 16GB rising to $899 for the 64GB one a 3G enabled version is a bit more money.

* image & italic text courtesy of >>> http://live.gdgt.com/2010/01/27/live-apple-come-see-our-latest-creation-tablet-event-coverage/#10-31-28-am

what do people think :

i think it looks cool.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, it's all looks, but the functionality is just gimmicky.. it's a hyped e-reader, with iPod. But, with all the E-reader apps available for the iPod Touch, I think it's just too similar to a jailbroken iPod Touch.

it is basically a Apple netbook, in the UK it will not be far off that Samsung netbook (the best netbook there is) in price & the ipad can do a lot more, if you want to do basic stuff then it will be fine, Apple's never seem to break down, maybe the second version will be a bit better with more memory i suppose it will be released 12 months after.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah.. It's not too overcomplicated, but that's, as always, due to Apple's restrictons. Eugh. But, you're right, it will sell. It's new, it's something that looks good, and most people won't think twice thanks to the persuasivness of the demos and the looks.

However, not all Apple products are looks > functionality. For instance, the iMac is just incredible. I've used it in Apple stores and it's just like "Hello. I am the epic win," on a desk.

Were you following, Alan? Jobs actually said that he hated netbooks. So I don't think he'd like that comparison ;)

samozzy.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah he has said many times that he doesn't like netbooks & when asked he said Apple cannot make a product cheaper than a macbook, because if it was any cheaper it wouldn't have the Apple quality etc, so they have done it slightly differently its a Apple netbook in all but name ;)

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have an iphone and from what I see its exactly the same only bigger, more expensive, more powerful, better graphics and ebooks. Have I missed anything?

Its disappointing and doesn't even have multitasking or push notifications. What a massive disappointment it is.

Looking forward to new iPhone 4.0 OS this year and the new iPhone in june.

SamMillsBish.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sort of, but much more revelutionary in my opinion... And anyone that knows me realises how much a don't like Apple kit.

I would agree with you there, and it's only generation 1, I'm surprised with the lack of camera though.

I wouldn't rate it until I get my hands on one, I couldn't personally see myself even thinking about getting one until a few generations time at the very least.

Re: the name.

I don't like it, iSlate would have been a much better choice in my opinion, although, in 2001 the name iPod was a weird choice and look where it is now.

I think it's a good price for the basic model ($499)

Their likely competitor is the Kindle DX which is Amazons e-reader which sells for around $429, they do have an app store on its way, but it will have nothing on the iPad, $70 extra isn't a lot for what you're getting.

Sure it's a glorified iPod touch, but this is only the start of something that could be revolutionary, and that's coming from someone who isn't a fan of Apple in the slightest.

It's going to be a record breaking item in terms of sales, Apple being Apple could sell a range of scented candles baring the Apple logo and make a fortune.

it is basically a Apple netbook.

I would say it's more along the lines of an iPod Touch than a netbook.

(it has the same OS as the iPod Touch too, as far as I'm aware)

Attunement.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone made the point in The Guardian that it doesn't have a lid like a laptop or any way of protecting it, making sure the screen doesn't get damaged. It doesn't fit in your pocket. I guess they'll sell a plethora of bags and cases to keep the things dry. I'm not really convinced it's anything that amazing though, just seems to be an iPhone/BlackBerry/HTC smartphone in a slightly bigger size, without the phoning or camera capabilities. And it's pretty expensive. I won't be investing in one, but that's hardly a surprise since I don't own/use any Apple products.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone made the point in The Guardian that it doesn't have a lid like a laptop or any way of protecting it, making sure the screen doesn't get damaged. It doesn't fit in your pocket. I guess they'll sell a plethora of bags and cases to keep the things dry.

http://www.apple.com/ipad/design/ (Scroll down to the end)

There is an official cover which doubles as a stand - looks very nice, don't know if it comes with it.

Secondly it was never meant to fit in anybody's pocket.

And it's not meant to replace your phone. It's meant to be more of what a laptop does, a webcam built in would have been nice though.

Y4Ar5.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

the iPad is targeting is the casual users who don't want to learn how to use computers, they want something that can do a few things that they want (i.e. show off photos to their friends, read magazines), and do it extremely well, it's not a netbook, far from it.

Attunement.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.apple.com/ipad/design/ (Scroll down to the end)

There is an official cover which doubles as a stand - looks very nice, don't know if it comes with it.

Secondly it was never meant to fit in anybody's pocket.

And it's not meant to replace your phone. It's meant to be more of what a laptop does, a webcam built in would have been nice though.

No.. It's not included.. But IF I get one (very unlikely) I'll definitely get the case. It not only protects it when it closes, but it acts as a stand, like you said. However, if the case doesn't leave gaps at the end to plug it in/use the dock simultaneously I shall be highly annoyed.

My official verdict (and respective blog post (shameless self-plug :P)) will come as soon as it gets in the Apple Stores, and I get in one to try one out. I don't think ANYONE's opinion is, in my opinion, properly valid. They have seen pictures and, though not always, a small demo. People need to TRY to see if they want to BUY. (or make an opinion at least! ;))

samozzy.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try to bear in mind that I'm a massive Apple geek, and as far as I'm concerned what I write next is sacrilege.

I don't want it.

After extensively looking over EVERYTHING I can find, tech specs, Videos, etc. etc. I've concluded that it is a Fat iPod Touch. There is nothing revolutionary, Nothing you can't find anywhere else, and nothing that makes me want it more than a iPod. It essentially has the bulkyness of a notebook, with the functionality of an iPod. And thats a very poor mix. It has nothing appealing that I can't get on my Touch, can't fit in my pocket, and is... poor. A poor attempt at getting something new out. If it was a proper Tablet Mac (see the Dell Tablet if you don't quite get what I mean) Then I would be raving. But it isn't. It's nothing.

And I hate myself so much for saying that.

Nik B.

Born to Toads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with what people say about it just being a big iPod Touch. The idea of having the apple-monitored app store being the only way to get apps onto it (unless you jailbreak) is always a bad thing. I do realise it means not having to hunt around the internet for apps but it also means you don't get quite a lot of decent apps just because they compete with apple ones or they break apple's terms of use when they're really not that bad. Not to mention the fact that it doesn't have multitasking and it's meant to compete with netbooks and it doesn't have a camera or countless other things.

Also, netbooks cost a lot less than that. If you were going to pay that much for a computer, you wouldn't get a netbook - you'd get a laptop or a desktop so in a way it should be judged alongside those. And when judging it in that way, it's safe to say you'd be much better off spending your money on a 13-15 inch laptop or a desktop than a giant iPod Touch.

www.GottaBeAndrew.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Bank Holiday Monday Schedule 6am-10am: Arielle Free in for Greg 10am-2pm: Dean & Vicky (No Rickie, Melvin & Charlie) 2pm-6pm: Vick & Jamie (No Katie) 6pm onwards: As normal.
    • Dare I say they've sounded great this past week?  Very much gelling.  Maybe less pressure?  Seem to be having a genuinely good time and not forcing things.
    • I'm in the minority in my workplace, most of them love country music.  Me, the American, does not care for it.  That said, I haven't haaaaaated some of the country adjacent stuff that's been on the R1 playlist.  
    • The Eurovision semi finals are on from 8 to 10pm on Tuesday 7th and Thursday 9th May with Richie Anderson. That means Sara Cox in on till 8 on those days.  Saturday 11th May is Eurovision 'Super Saturday... 1-3pm Your Ultimate Abba song with Gary Davies  3-6pm Michelle Visage's Eurovision All Stars 6-8pm Eurovision Request Party with Owain Wynn Evans 8pm Eurovision Grand Final with Scott Mills and Rylan Clark  
    • It is funny because everyone thought Matt was on the way out, now he's been described as the heir to Mills.
    • Some similar names to Big Weekend.  Sabrina Carpenter, David Guetta, Perrie, Bradley Simpson, Jax Jones, Caity Baser, Benson Boone, Rudimental. David Guetta is a good name. 
    • Still Scott for me. I'm not too much into the 70s and 80s radio 2 play but do love the injection of 90s and 00s. Then Radio 2 push for all this country stuff and it not a UK thing, and I frankly don't like it. Scott's show as in features, hit and miss. I like the music police bit, but it feels like someone needs to join him. It's a shame Chappers is so busy with sports, as it feels like it could do with someone like him jumping on to help. Or a new partner. Radio 1, take or leave. Matt and Mollie are OK from what I've heard and share a good connection, but it's the playlist that throws me off. They could bring back Chris Moyles to do that show, but as soon as something like Headie One comes on with that casino keyboard produced crap. It would still be switched off from me. 
    • Reading through this thread, I don't feel quite so alone now, in thinking that Scott Mills on R2 is not a good 'fit' (even less so than on R5).  I can't quite explain why this is so - I just know it to be so.
    • Arielle has been on holiday for the last 2 weeks getting married / honeymoon.  It'll be live from this week onwards.
    • CassKidd is in for Sian on Sunday 5th May.
    • The brought to tiers feature was also very good from them. I did wonder which DJ's were going to get picked out of the hat, that could have gone one way or the other and the caller said they were very opinionated lol. Correct decision putting katie in god tier!
    • The extended Dua Lipa track from M&M was very funny. I'm hoping Matt and Mollie and Scott have a good relationship a bit like Greg and Zoe collaborate on-air sometimes.
    • Gary Davies in for Vernon Kay tomorrow (Monday 29th April).
    • When Scott and Chris announced their departure from R1, I remember there was lots of speculation about who would take over the 1pm slot. Matt and Mollie were talked about a lot on here, and at the time I really didn't rate them as a replacement. A few years on, I see that I was totally wrong. They are such a good pairing, and it's the same kind of duo as Scott and Chris, in that they are real life friends, who spend time together in their real lives, which really does come across on air. True friends having a laugh together, and everyone is invited is how it feels to me now. I never thought about it before, but I agree with @coffeeandgin that Mollie is the Scott of the duo - pop obsessed and maybe a litte ditsy, but so funny, and in need of someone to anchor to or bounce off.  It seems that Matt is the kind of Chris of the duo then in that comparison, the one with the ideas, but also needs another person to make the magic happen. I know I'm outside of the R1 demographic, and maybe Dean and Vicky were meant to be younger and fresher, but I'm sure in my younger years I would have preferred to listen to two people who had a genuine connection and could really make each other laugh, as well as have the listeners laugh along. That was the Scott and Chris factor for me, and I think the only pair that come close to that now are Matt and Mollie.
×
×
  • Create New...