Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Smoking **Not for the Squeamish!!**


Geezer7348

Will the new images on tobacco products help you quit smoking?  

17 members have voted

  1. 1. Will the new images on tobacco products help you quit smoking?

    • Yes definately
      2
    • No, it has no effect on me
      5
    • I've never smoked
      12
    • I no longer smoke
      2


Recommended Posts

Ex smoker here - I started at 12 so age restrictions made no difference, almost all my family smoked, there were always cigarettes in the house. Only managed to finally give up when a change of lifestyle meant I no longer saw my smoker friends. Motivation is the key - scary repulsive pictures may make the habit seem less cool, but only an inner personal decision to quit will work in the end. Just like any addiction really.

UM is a nice place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People will happily sit with a box in front of them with the words "Smoking kills" and "Smoking causes impotence" and smoke cigarettes out of it so I don't think this will make much difference, people will get used to the images and not notice them.

I don't think raising the age to 18 will make any difference at all unless they actually ID in the same way they do with alcohol, and 16 and 17 year olds drink.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C_71_Articles_214309_BodyWeb_Detail_0_Image.jpg

That would be enough for me! Ughh. I don't smoke, I never have, I think it's horrible and I don't see any point.

Those things they have on packets now are stupid. It makes me sick when i see someone smoking and the packet says something like "smoking seriously harms children"

and they're sat there smoking happily, not arsed.

It's disgusting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I must have missed that yesterday, sorry! Scott did make the same tongue in cheek comment on today's show about Rylan. It's a shame Rylan isn't the go to cover for Scott, I assume his commitments away from R2 prevent that. I enjoyed his last cover stint. Spoony is the go to stand in for the mid afternoon slot (he's covering again week after next while Scott's off getting married).   In that case, I think you're right! 
    • Not that last minute. Scott was talking about it on his own show yesterday, saying he and Rylan have a deal where they cover each other's shows but Rylan only covers Scott when he can be bothered!
    • Sorry I should have been clearer, I meant daytime weekday. Weekend shows would count as a 'step up' from overnights for OJ.
    • If we're counting the overnight slot, OJ Borg regularly covers weekend shows.
    • The only weekday R2 DJ who would ever cover a weekend slot?!
    • What I assume is a very last minute change... Scott Mills is in for Rylan today.
    • Radio 1 at Parklife will be presented by Vicky and Nat. Nat is currently listed to present her usual Sunday show on that weekend but I imagine that will change and someone else will be doing it instead. The Radio 1 presenters at Download will be Daniel P Carter, Jack Saunders, Alyx Holcombe and Nels Hylton.
    • Nat in for Dean with Vicky as well that day.
    • So the end of weekend afternoons this week - new show is July 1st.
    • Arielle is in for Greg on Monday 27th May.
    • He’s definitely gotten better and the show has sounded fine this week. I think it been at its best when it’s been Katie and Jamie or Vick and Katie. Vick and Jamie are ok together, but I do think the show sounds better when it’s Vick and Katie and therefore I still don’t really understand the point of the trio.    Jamie is, however, a lot better than Danny Beard! 
    • The RAJAR coming on later this year reflecting later summer to autumn will be interesting to how it reflects Matt and Mollie in afternoons to the revised changes on radio 1’s new music slots and the schedule re-shuffling Radio 3 introducing a new slate of programmes. Then, later on this year have speech radio stations having domestic political coverage of the election but also America’s presidential election.  
    • I actually caught snippets of today’s show, and I found it much better than the last time I listened. I have made it no secret that I like Jamie on the radio, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed Matt & him together last year. People have criticised him for not being relatable, but I have to agree with the comment above that I have always found him a naturally warm person to listen to. Maybe the going home set up was something that needed settling in and things are starting to take shape.  It must have been difficult for him joining an established duo in Vick & Katie to begin with.  Jamie was great on something songs today, fully engaged in the caller and sounded like a real presenter. Maybe he is doing as a lot of us hoped and really learning as he goes, how to do it properly. 
    • Agree with this. The anti-Jamie feeling was IMO quite influenced by the negativity around him replacing Jordan, since Jordan was exceptional and also universally loved. When people mention Danny and Jamie in the same sentence about bad hiring decisions I almost choke - Jamie may not be perfect but he's several leagues better than Danny already and has bags of potential. Danny is poor and has shown zero potential...
    • Jamie started 4 March, and the figures only going up to 31 March, so it isn't reliable. But it has shown the numbers have dropped in afternoons compared to last quarter. It looks like it's Capital's gain.
×
×
  • Create New...