Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

FIFA World Cup 2010 - South Africa


John

Recommended Posts

time & time again this happens, all this we have a easy group & then we loose against a good team, this is because they (England) cannot make the step up, if you play against poor teams that is how you will play yourself & that's one if the problems,

a other is that there is no team, there is no 'i' in team & they just play as individuals, they want the headline for themselves "Rooney won it for England" etc,

yet another is they they are not skillful enough, the passing is woeful at best as a England team, as individuals for their clubs they are not much better & i'm not sure if there were more English players in the Premiership would make any difference, yes there would be more players to choose from, but it would still be a mediocre bunch,

the manager has to take full responsibility, however in this case the players were very poor, ok Capello made some errors in sub's today, but the outcome would have been the same & the blame falls fully on the players,

cannot see Capello staying but the players want someone who will let them fuck-about & they don't like it when they have someone who will stand up to them, not sure if Hodgson will take it up, but i hope he doesn't, there are very few managers out there though & the only one with any realistic chance of getting anything out of the current players there are available is José,

the England managers job is a poisoned chalice, because as a team England are not as good as everyone thinks they are.

*maybe the Lampard goal would have changed the game to England's advantage, because everyone would have played differently, but i still think England would have lost.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 226
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

But if it had been given we'd have still had the momentum and not been so disheartened come half time...

Oh but it's faaaaaaaaaar too expensive to give us goal line technology! Y'know, that one camera would cost fortunes...

*edit* The England players are damn well skilful enough. Just they never fecking translate it to the matches that count.

There/ They're/ Their. Different words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

time & time again this happens, all this we have a easy group & then we loose against a good team, this is because they (England) cannot make the step up, if you play against poor teams that is how you will play yourself & that's one if the problems,

a other is that there is no team, there is no 'i' in team & they just play as individuals, they want the headline for themselves "Rooney won it for England" etc,

yet another is they they are not skillful enough, the passing is woeful at best as a England team, as individuals for their clubs they are not much better & i'm not sure if there were more English players in the Premiership would make any difference, yes there would be more players to choose from, but it would still be a mediocre bunch,

the manager has to take full responsibility, however in this case the players were very poor, ok Capello made some errors in sub's today, but the outcome would have been the same & the blame falls fully on the players,

cannot see Capello staying but the players want someone who will let them fuck-about & they don't like it when they have someone who will stand up to them, not sure if Hodgson will take it up, but i hope he doesn't, there are very few managers out there though & the only one with any realistic chance of getting anything out of the current players there are available is José,

the England managers job is a poisoned chalice, because as a team England are not as good as everyone thinks they are.

*maybe the Lampard goal would have changed the game to England's advantage, because everyone would have played differently, but i still think England would have lost.

Let's remind ourselves that in that EASY group, they only scraped through and didn't even win the group, furthermore that the group was won by a country where football barely registers as a sport.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But if it had been given we'd have still had the momentum and not been so disheartened come half time...

Oh but it's faaaaaaaaaar too expensive to give us goal line technology! Y'know, that one camera would cost fortunes...

*edit* The England players are damn well skilful enough. Just they never fecking translate it to the matches that count.

i said that the goal would have made a difference, but i doubt that the way the players performed they would have been able to have scored again & held onto a lead.

i have to disagree with you on the skill levels of the England players, Becks had skill in the way he could take free-kicks, but no England player has any on the ball skill, we have no players like,

Tevez, Messi, Forlan, Villa

Kaka, Xavi, Ronaldo, Melo,

Ramos, Maicon, Lahm, Heinze

Casillas, Cesar

it is plain stupid that FIFA are still resisting tech on the game.

Let's remind ourselves that in that EASY group, they only scraped through and didn't even win the group, furthermore that the group was won by a country where football barely registers as a sport.

exactly my point, when they have to step up their game they don't have the time to react, if England had been in with Brazil & Portugal they would have known they had to perform from the off, instead they thought they would walk it & when they had to step up against Germany, they couldn't do it.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the end, goal or not (and it's pretty damn near impossible to deny it IS), the OTHER goals Germany scored meant that it didn't change the end result too much.

Not true at all. England conceded the 3rd and 4th goals because they chucked loads of players forward searching for an equaliser. Had it been 2-2, they would have had more defenders back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noone can say for sure what difference it would've made if that goal had stood. If it had been 2 all at HT England might have come out thinking they could win and played really well (which i doubt) or Germany could've hammered us even more and it's no good having defenders back if they can't defend. The bottom line is if you look back at the last 3 games in theory they should've won all of them easily,They just aren't good enough and it's all hype. I'm just glad they went out now so that they don't get humiliated by Argentina or even Mexico.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont watch/like/generally tolerate football at all, however I had to watch this as it was on at a friends place. Sad result really, the denied goal will have no doubt had an effect on morale and thats probably why the germans got another couple in in the second half.

I personally just can't wait for the world cup to be over, the North British (or scottish) mentality is pathetic when this time of year comes around, I have had to sit and listen to countless anti English rants and comments which if they were based towards any other country would generally be considered racist. Personally I think its nothing short of pathetic biogtry.

However I will be hoping that Holland get on alright, if they win the whole thing I stand to get a pretty nice sum of money from a sweepstake at work

Not impressed with censorship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not interested in football at all but thought it was sad to see England go out today. Yes, I am Scottish but I am also British and wanted England to do well. I am against all kind of bigotry, unfortunately many Scottish people didn't want England to win and I think it's pathetic, as is the bigotry toward Scotland by many England fans.
I agree its patietic, it is defintly a 2 way thing but I find that it is by far the scots who are worse, and I think it is down to jealousy.

Thing is, so many English fans also aim that bigotry at ALL other countries, not just Scotland, then dare to call it 'patriotism' (whereas the way they do it is far beyond patriotism and is in fact closer to 'racism'). For instance, I can imagine all the bitter anti-German headlines we'll get tomorrow now... even in the buildup there were tacky and stupid WWII references by idiotic tabloid hacks who obviously live in the past...

@AlistairRobb

Yes they DO always get hyped up, don't they, and usually it dooms them to failure too.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true at all. England conceded the 3rd and 4th goals because they chucked loads of players forward searching for an equaliser. Had it been 2-2, they would have had more defenders back.

England weren't good enough and we have to admit it. We couldn't score when we were 2-1 behind at half time so I don't think we would have scored if we'd just managed to get an equaliser, whilst the Huns looked like scoring all the time.

We've had 2 managers with almost perfect club records manage the national team in recent times and each time players like Rooney Lampard Gerrard player distinctly average and don't play as a team at all. That's the problem. We can't do an Ireland we have to face the facts. We are not good enough. The players are the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fabio is a big part of the problem, sven did better than him. capello treated the camp like an army prison, had personal grudges aginst players (joe cole, michael owen), plus they had no freedom. too scared to sub rooney if he's playing bad. all that for the last 16? fuck off fabio, i'd rather have sven back or not go at all.

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not true at all. England conceded the 3rd and 4th goals because they chucked loads of players forward searching for an equaliser. Had it been 2-2, they would have had more defenders back.

Had they got an equaliser, they probably would have got cocky or complacent, and still have lost. I mean the Germans managed to put 2 goals in when they DID have more defenders, didn't they?

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not interested in football at all but thought it was sad to see England go out today. Yes, I am Scottish but I am also British and wanted England to do well. I am against all kind of bigotry, unfortunately many Scottish people didn't want England to win and I think it's pathetic, as is the bigotry toward Scotland by many England fans.

The hatred felt by fans against others is one of the things that really puts me off football, be it Celtic/Rangers, Scotland/England. It's very sad that many people use it as an outlet to hate on others.

However, I know that there are a lot of fans out there on all 'sides' who purely love watching football and are passionate for all the right reasons. Hope you are not too upset today and can enjoy watching the rest of the World Cup!

Do you know, you're the first Scot I have come across who thinks the whole football bigotry thing is ridiculous? I salute you!

I just don't understand why some Scottish people would rather anyone than England win the World Cup, etc., it baffles me as to why people don't support the country nearest to them when their own country sometimes don't make it into tournaments, it's crazy!

Alouette...deployer les ailes;

Alouette...plumerai les ailes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As with a lot of bigotry most people just feel this way because they have grown up with people around them who feel this way. A lot of bigots don't have a mind of their own and don't even know why they 'hate' these other people. As you say it's often 'because they're English' etc.....hmmmm and your point is?

I don't really know if it is worse in Scotland, to be fair I have only really experienced it from a Scottish point of view so I couldn't really say who is worse.

It's a load of nonsense! Errr and as for 'sometimes don't make it into tournaments' I think you're being a bit generous there Emma, more like never, haha!

you're a one off, it's a shame more scots aren't like you.

it goes beyond a football thing for me. after 7/7 i remember thinking 'who's side are they really on?'

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it baffles me as to why people don't support the country nearest to them when their own country sometimes don't make it into tournaments, it's crazy!

Wales don't support England.

Ireland don't support England.

Ireland don't support northern Ireland.

Wales don't support Scotland.

England don't support Wales.

England don't support Scotland.

England don't support France.

Could go on. Countires are rivals (many reasons; wars, etc.) and you would be hard pushed to find two countries beside each other who truely want the other to do well. Hell, more often than not the closer they are the more they don't want them doing well.

www.twitter.com/#!/AlistairRobb93

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wales don't support England.

Ireland don't support England.

Ireland don't support northern Ireland.

Wales don't support Scotland.

England don't support Wales.

England don't support Scotland.

England don't support France.

Could go on. Countires are rivals (many reasons; wars, etc.) and you would be hard pushed to find two countries beside each other who truely want the other to do well. Hell, more often than not the closer they are the more they don't want them doing well.

Indeed, think the only time this isn't the case is Eurovision. That said, the rivalries aren't always mutual. For instance, all the stuff the UK press throws at Germany, the Germans are more bothered about rivalries with other countries in central Europe, including places like Poland from what I can gather from German friends.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Bank Holiday Monday Schedule 6am-10am: Arielle Free in for Greg 10am-2pm: Dean & Vicky (No Rickie, Melvin & Charlie) 2pm-6pm: Vick & Jamie (No Katie) 6pm onwards: As normal.
    • Dare I say they've sounded great this past week?  Very much gelling.  Maybe less pressure?  Seem to be having a genuinely good time and not forcing things.
    • I'm in the minority in my workplace, most of them love country music.  Me, the American, does not care for it.  That said, I haven't haaaaaated some of the country adjacent stuff that's been on the R1 playlist.  
    • The Eurovision semi finals are on from 8 to 10pm on Tuesday 7th and Thursday 9th May with Richie Anderson. That means Sara Cox in on till 8 on those days.  Saturday 11th May is Eurovision 'Super Saturday... 1-3pm Your Ultimate Abba song with Gary Davies  3-6pm Michelle Visage's Eurovision All Stars 6-8pm Eurovision Request Party with Owain Wynn Evans 8pm Eurovision Grand Final with Scott Mills and Rylan Clark  
    • It is funny because everyone thought Matt was on the way out, now he's been described as the heir to Mills.
    • Some similar names to Big Weekend.  Sabrina Carpenter, David Guetta, Perrie, Bradley Simpson, Jax Jones, Caity Baser, Benson Boone, Rudimental. David Guetta is a good name. 
    • Still Scott for me. I'm not too much into the 70s and 80s radio 2 play but do love the injection of 90s and 00s. Then Radio 2 push for all this country stuff and it not a UK thing, and I frankly don't like it. Scott's show as in features, hit and miss. I like the music police bit, but it feels like someone needs to join him. It's a shame Chappers is so busy with sports, as it feels like it could do with someone like him jumping on to help. Or a new partner. Radio 1, take or leave. Matt and Mollie are OK from what I've heard and share a good connection, but it's the playlist that throws me off. They could bring back Chris Moyles to do that show, but as soon as something like Headie One comes on with that casino keyboard produced crap. It would still be switched off from me. 
    • Reading through this thread, I don't feel quite so alone now, in thinking that Scott Mills on R2 is not a good 'fit' (even less so than on R5).  I can't quite explain why this is so - I just know it to be so.
    • Arielle has been on holiday for the last 2 weeks getting married / honeymoon.  It'll be live from this week onwards.
    • CassKidd is in for Sian on Sunday 5th May.
    • The brought to tiers feature was also very good from them. I did wonder which DJ's were going to get picked out of the hat, that could have gone one way or the other and the caller said they were very opinionated lol. Correct decision putting katie in god tier!
    • The extended Dua Lipa track from M&M was very funny. I'm hoping Matt and Mollie and Scott have a good relationship a bit like Greg and Zoe collaborate on-air sometimes.
    • Gary Davies in for Vernon Kay tomorrow (Monday 29th April).
    • When Scott and Chris announced their departure from R1, I remember there was lots of speculation about who would take over the 1pm slot. Matt and Mollie were talked about a lot on here, and at the time I really didn't rate them as a replacement. A few years on, I see that I was totally wrong. They are such a good pairing, and it's the same kind of duo as Scott and Chris, in that they are real life friends, who spend time together in their real lives, which really does come across on air. True friends having a laugh together, and everyone is invited is how it feels to me now. I never thought about it before, but I agree with @coffeeandgin that Mollie is the Scott of the duo - pop obsessed and maybe a litte ditsy, but so funny, and in need of someone to anchor to or bounce off.  It seems that Matt is the kind of Chris of the duo then in that comparison, the one with the ideas, but also needs another person to make the magic happen. I know I'm outside of the R1 demographic, and maybe Dean and Vicky were meant to be younger and fresher, but I'm sure in my younger years I would have preferred to listen to two people who had a genuine connection and could really make each other laugh, as well as have the listeners laugh along. That was the Scott and Chris factor for me, and I think the only pair that come close to that now are Matt and Mollie.
×
×
  • Create New...