Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Scott Mills Twitter page


Guest inxces4308

Recommended Posts

Guest inxces4308

I know that UM runs the scott_mills page on Twitter and its stated like that but now howcome the updates from it are starting to talk to the R1 presenters as if its Scott?

Surely thats not right!

Just wanted to add my two penies worth as I think its wrong and no doubt i'll get shouted at back for it but I just don't think its right!

@zanelowe It feels like we're worlds apart this week. Admit it - you miss us.
Is it wrong to not say goodbye to work colleagues and friends? I'm always doing runners at work but never say bye. Beccy gets a bit hurt!
Don't think there'll be any fake tan being applied for the time being.
Still in pain after an awfully bad shave last night. Resulted in using a sock to prevent the bleeding while in taxi to award ceremony.
@anniemacdj Stop talking to an impostor. Lack of awards all round tonight!

That makes it sounds like its Scott but I remember him saying a while ago on-air that he dosent go on Twitter, and it says on the side, the latest from UM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest inxces4308
jono said it had to be more like the andy parfitt twitter and be more obvious its a fake as it was causing issues in the past :) people are silly to follow something that evidently says "these are the views of the geeks and not necessarily those of Scott or the Beeb."

Oh, still not right but you got Zane Lowe anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does stipulate that it is a fake and that the views are of the geeks and not those of Scott or the Beeb. The Unofficial Mills background is there too.

I wonder where inxces would draw the line? Would he prefer someone at the BBC to produce one for him - after all Laura used to update Scott's diary for him. Would he feel disappointed to find that Greg, Moyles and Mills' fan page updates aren't by themselves either?

As for 'talking' to the DJs - well that's a bit of fun and are one-offs. They should know better. Most are aware it's a fake - Huw still responds for a laugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know that UM runs the scott_mills page on Twitter and its stated like that but now howcome the updates from it are starting to talk to the R1 presenters as if its Scott?

Surely thats not right!

Just wanted to add my two penies worth as I think its wrong and no doubt i'll get shouted at back for it but I just don't think its right!

That makes it sounds like its Scott but I remember him saying a while ago on-air that he dosent go on Twitter, and it says on the side, the latest from UM.

In precisely what way is it 'not right'? As you stated yourself it is perfectly clear that Scott has nothing to do with the Twitter account, due to the s*dding great Unofficial Mills typed down the side, the profile and the fact that he's already said on the show that he isn't on Twitter (his loss IMO).

He did, however completely endorse the Twitter account as he claimed he'd be far to lazy to keep it up himself and whoever maintains it knows more about what he's doing than he does. Sure there's a clip of that somewhere.

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest inxces4308
In precisely what way is it 'not right'? As you stated yourself it is perfectly clear that Scott has nothing to do with the Twitter account, due to the s*dding great Unofficial Mills typed down the side, the profile and the fact that he's already said on the show that he isn't on Twitter (his loss IMO).

He did, however completely endorse the Twitter account as he claimed he'd be far to lazy to keep it up himself and whoever maintains it knows more about what he's doing than he does. Sure there's a clip of that somewhere.

What I found 'not right' about it is that I thought Unofficial Mills was above/better than that with having to impersonate somebody, especially when they run a nice fan site for the same person.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I found 'not right' about it is that I thought Unofficial Mills was above/better than that with having to impersonate somebody, especially when they run a nice fan site for the same person.....

But they aren't "impersonating" because it clearly states that it is run by geeks. It's not like it's got "OMG This is the real Scott!!! Good Mornin'!" is it?

Nik B.

Born to Toads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well it could simply be wrote in 3rd person?

"Scott is at the zoo feeding the penguins cherry bake wells"

Tweets like "Nothing like having a siesta in the middle of the day..." "Is it wrong to not say goodbye to work colleagues and friends? I'm always doing runners at work but never say bye. Beccy gets a bit hurt!" shouldn't be submitted in my opinion.

Attunement.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest inxces4308
well it could simply be wrote in 3rd person?

"Scott is at the zoo feeding the penguins cherry bake wells"

Tweets like "Nothing like having a siesta in the middle of the day..." "Is it wrong to not say goodbye to work colleagues and friends? I'm always doing runners at work but never say bye. Beccy gets a bit hurt!" shouldn't be submitted in my opinion.

Thanks, thats what i've been sort of saying, not very well though!, but been getting shot down.

Atleast somebody else gets my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

twitter isnt designed for the third person. or you'd get "scott_mills scott mills is doing this" or "is doing this" in tweet deck. i don't think its wrong if you are honest its a fake? i prefer jono doing it and giving fact that the knob doing comedy dave's who reckons he was at the sonys which wasn't true. its different on here as we are geeks we know most of what jono writes. for those who arent here it is a new way to get information about the show which the facebook page fails in helping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twiters not designed for fake accounts either!

I've spoken about Twitter and there is awareness that it is a good tool for promotion. It's also very useful to help promote other Mills stuff on the internet. It's not my fault Scott doesn't use it while the majority of other DJs does. Some other clown will only end up doing it otherwise and at least mine is monitored. It was agreed as long as one isn't being tricked there isn't yet a problem - it says it's a fake account. It says the views are not of Scott or the BBC. It also says Unofficial Mills down the side.

There is an option to block fake accounts and if Scott or his people felt it was a problem he has the right to do that. Ashley Tabor from Global took that decision to do that with his, however, key industry figures such as Andy Parfitt have chosen not to.

If Scott comes to me and says "I want to give this Twitter lark a go" the option is there with a respectful number of 35,000 followers and I could help moderate that. The BBC have already taken that route with Facebook pages - "fake" pages actually led the way in helping the BBC set up base on Facebook due to their popularity. Adam and Chris started Moyles and Mills' Facebook pages and this led to R1 realising it was a good idea. The same could be done with this one.

I dare say even if the team did take over the Twitter there would be people like yourself annoyed as Scott would no doubt lose interest like MySpace. Laura used to update the "diary" of Wonder Years tracklistings for him - so there's still an element of fakery in these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest inxces4308
It's clearly labelled there's no problem with it. If you don't like it don't follow :rolleyes:

I'm not. I came across it. Just because its labelled dosn't make it right and thats what i'm saying.

End of.

Atleast make it funny and sound totally unlike Scott, like Andy Parfitts does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not. I came across it. Just because its labelled dosn't make it right and thats what i'm saying.

End of.

Atleast make it funny and sound totally unlike Scott, like Andy Parfitts does.

Yes please, as you clearly appear to lack a sense of humour.

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest inxces4308
Yes please, as you clearly appear to lack a sense of humour.

If the postings (tweets) where funny, i'd laugh and not create this thread.

I find the Andy Parfitt Twitter very funny, just not the UM have created.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Twiters not designed for fake accounts either!

Hmm. Will have to beg to differ. 50 Cent pays ghostwriter Cris Romero to post his updates. Britney Spears is no better. Maybe UM ought to receive some sort of renumeration?;)

'Those too busy to type 140 characters themselves have even taken to paying ghostwriters. The rapper 50 Cent reportedly hired a web ghostwriter, Chris Romero, also known as Broadway, to post his updates. So that’s a rapper who uses a pseudonym hiring a pseudonymous writer to write his tweets, pseudonymously. Ouch. My head hurts.

Spears has a team of Twitter writers coming up with gems like this: “Went to the movies with the dancers tonight. We saw I Love You, Man. Sooooo funny! Brit.” '.

Above quote taken from Sunday Times article below. Interesting.: http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6241650.ece

PS. Thought you'd said 'end of'?

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Tara Kumar is in for Sian on Tuesday 4th June.
    • I think at least part of the problem is that a lot of Danny's act is based around Drag humour which (a) isn't for everybody (b) has to be so tamed down for daytime radio, it just becomes silly and (c) it is humour generally consumed on a night out with lots of alcohol taken!
    • Oh boy, if that's the case above then what are they trying to do at r1? If Danny was put into weekend afternoons that's one hell of a faux par and a big nail in the coffin. While ok, Nat and Vicky aren't about to blow the doors off and are only there as the fallout of d&v, but to then follow that up with Danny for 3 days a week. Come on. To go from a place where we had Katie followed by M&M to that. What happened to the prestigiousness of r1? Do they need reminding they've just lost Jordan? It's getting embarrassing. Like I said before, when I had people with 0 interest in radio whatsoever and it was in the background telling me to turn it off, you know it's bad. I saw a random friend from years ago even posting on fb with how has someone like Danny ended up on r1. Everywhere you turn its negative. Doesn't that multiply across the uk in what the r1 audience actually think of this presenter? I'm in the LGBTQ+ community and also r1 target audience but I don't feel I want to listen to this presenter because of that fact. Has some policy actually overtaken the true risk of driving audiences away? The fact is just how @coffeeandgin said, Danny has had chance since March with 2 shows a week and is still not up to the job. The odd podcast yes but certainly not to replace m&m! I've skipped through 10 minutes of this week to make sure I wasn't basing opinions on how it was before and yes it is the same level. When you had presenters like Scott who could keep it fresh despite how many years it had been, but then Danny sounds so out of date already, saying you could tune over to Rylan on r2... but then with a topic of "I want to know what have you missed out on?" I'm sorry?! What kind of local radio is that... it's meant to be radio 1 ffs. Terrible talking points, cringe, unfunny, and so bad on the radio it actually makes it jarring and makes people switch over.
    • I don’t think it will be September it will be a very messy schedule if that’s the case 
    • As a member of the LGBTQ+ community my position is exactly yours on female representation.  Yes I want representation but only on merit.   Even if Radio 1 would like more representation from this sector, there are stacks of better options than Danny Beard.  
    • I hope you're right! I remember some years ago hearing that the biggest show at a weekend was mid-mornings, but not sure if that's changed with the changing pattern of radio listening in general. Given the best show at the weekend (by a distance) is M&M, would make sense that's now the biggest slot.
    • Someone on here said recently weekend afternoons have a big audience. I think you'd want some of your biggest talent here. Which is why there was talk of a reshuffle. I couldn't personally see Danny in this slot if they decided to keep him. 
    • I understand that representation is important. And I can't speak for the LGBTQ+ community. But, as a woman in my mid 30s, I have seen a massive shift towards 'having more women' in every industry/organisation in my lifetime. I have always felt that it should be on merit and capability to carry out a role effectively, rather than just filling a role as a specific gender. Women can be fantastic at everything, but on a personal level I would not want to be hired, for example, as a firefighter  just because I was the only female candidate. I am 5 foot nothing and could not carry you out of a burning building.
    • If they were going to do this, wouldn’t it make more sense to keep Danny at 10.30am and move Nat and Vicky to 1pm? I feel the idea of giving someone a job largely because of their sexuality isn’t particularly good either…
    • Right so prediction time. I think “Summer on Radio 1” which is on the schedule for Friday to Sunday 1-4 from June sticks around longer than the other changes in July. I think that lasts until September which is when we get the new weekend afternoon show. I think they’ll want to give Danny longer on air to see if they improve. I can’t see that happening, so my guess is in September they move Sam & Danni to weekend afternoons (at that point they’ll have been on weekend breakfast for a full year), and they bring James Cusack in to do weekend breakfast. 
    • If Aled decides to give Danny a full time role, even as part of a duo / trio, it'll be the most disappointing decision of his tenure. The fact Danny is still on air and hasn't been quietly moved on 'due to a change in plan' is bad enough!
    • I'd say Danny has been given a fair hearing - and hasn't been up to par. You don't want Radio 1 to be a closed shop - but not being able to usually get the Whatsapp number right should be a dealbreaker. Errors happen even to the best DJs at times but if you can't get the Whatsapp number right you really shouldn't have a regular role on the station. But if they really are that desperate to have Danny on the schedule full-time then pair him up with somebody who can actually handle the technical side. You think of all the capable DJs who are in duos and trios and then you have just have a rookie like Danny left solo.  The LGBTQ+ point too I have to say if true as a gay man feels a case of proper discrimination. It's good to have LGBTQ+ representation for sure but the key thing is that the DJ is good at the end of the day and say in 2021 there was loads of LGBTQ+ talent on Radio 1 in Scott, Grimmy and Adele Roberts among others but at the end of the day they were strong DJs entirely there on merit. And even now there's still LGBTQ+ talent on Radio 1 who are there primarily because they're bloody good broadcasters. Danny is not one of them.
    • There is a reason you don't know who is doing weekend afternoons yet. The plan is still to see how Danny Beard's trial goes on weekend mornings. Newspaper clippings have demonstrated Aled has been keen to push Danny Beard at the weekend and to give him a fair hearing. The plan looks to be to wait and see whether he improves in the next few weeks. The bosses still want more LBGTQ+ representation on the station.
    • I think they should just bring that back as was. It's been nearly 20 years, so do it with a whole bunch of new DJ's. 
    • I think this year has taught us we know nothing 🙂 Nobody would ever have credibly predicted Jordan leaving and all the changes that followed.   I have another interest outside radio and it is exactly the same - the stuff you never expect to happen is exactly what does.
×
×
  • Create New...