Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

radio 1 is spoiling it for americans!


4hmoncu

Recommended Posts

Well...... We sort of pay a large amount of money to the BBC for the privilege of all its products (whether we want them all or not) and you don't so we should get more than the rest of the world. We pay for it so why not.

Gordon Brown says there's light at the end of the tunnel..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't complain - be grateful we international listeners are even able to listen to Radio 1 (it's not just Americans who can't see the videos - it's anyone outside the UK). I was shocked when I found out BBC radio is available to anyone with an internet connection. I'm very very happy that it is, of course, but don't quite understand why they have chosen to give me this access. I'm not paying for it; I'm paying my ISP for internet but they're not giving Radio 1 any of that money!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what right does radio 1 have to prevent us seeing certain videos from the big weekend: we're listeners too! :cry:

We pay for it you don't

http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/information/index.jsp

Apart from that i'm sure there are probably rights issues with all the artists. You could of course just use a proxy that says your in the UK or send £139.50 (£47.00 if you are watching them in black and white)to me.

Download the Adam and Joe & Jon Richardson podcasts now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whether it has anything to do with the license fee or not, it's the same for us.

I've tried many times to watch shows on an American website, NBC and stuff, which have similar things to the BBC iPlayer, but cannot because I'm not in the US. So it's not just the Beeb who do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone's bound to put some of the clips on YouTube.

Oh, and by the way, at least $40,000,000 goes to the BBC every year because of the Public Broadcasting Stations here, so it's not like none of us are paying for it.

If I remember correctly, and it is a rough idea, but I believe the BBC Worldwide is funded entirely by the revenue abroad from commercials. The BBC in the UK funds nothing of the BBC worldwide, any money made on operations is just put straight back into BBC worldwide funding. Do BBC channels over there have commercials like every other channels... thhats weird trying to imagine that!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BBC America is possibly part of BBC Worldwide which is an organisation which makes money through sales of magazines and albums. None of it goes back into the BBC here.

PBS and BBC America are two different channels.

BBC America shows loads of advets, but they add around fifteen minutes to each show to make up for that. PBS has no advertising and is sponsored by its pledge drives and organizations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. I can't watch any of FOX,CBS etc online, so why should anyone outside of the UK be allowed to watch any UK BBC content. Those channels make money from advertising, how hard could it be for them to change their adverts to UK adverts, its done elsewhere on the web.

The BBC is funded by all of us poor UK souls, as we all are aware. Just as anyone in this country isn't allowed to watch tv/online content(no idea how thats tracked) without paying for it, no one outside of the UK can get it, which is the way it should be!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon the licence fee is a bargain. Think what you get for £12.50 a month (or thereabouts) from the likes of Sky for their own programming, which is mostly bought in from the US and not self-created... and mostly made up of re-runs. In terms of value, I don't think the BBC can be beaten for the quality content it comes out with.

The question of international access to BBC content is a difficult one though. They are still recognised as one of the best broadcasting organisations in the world, so maybe the content should be available elsewhere (however that's actually funded)?

Not sure on that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its perfectly fair that if I can be prosecuted for not paying the license fee, I should get extra than a non fee paying international listener. By all means listen to some of the stuff, just don't expect us to pay for you.

Gordon Brown says there's light at the end of the tunnel..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon the licence fee is a bargain. Think what you get for £12.50 a month (or thereabouts) from the likes of Sky for their own programming, which is mostly bought in from the US and not self-created... and mostly made up of re-runs. In terms of value, I don't think the BBC can be beaten for the quality content it comes out with.

You make a very valid point there. It's not until you look at Sky TV's £38 or £40 a month charge that you get a perspective on it all. Sure you have to buy the equipment, but in terms of monthly fees you're getting great radio, sport, online content, television and more for just £12.50.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I reckon the licence fee is a bargain. Think what you get for £12.50 a month (or thereabouts) from the likes of Sky for their own programming, which is mostly bought in from the US and not self-created... and mostly made up of re-runs. In terms of value, I don't think the BBC can be beaten for the quality content it comes out with.

The question of international access to BBC content is a difficult one though. They are still recognised as one of the best broadcasting organisations in the world, so maybe the content should be available elsewhere (however that's actually funded)?

Not sure on that one.

I never appreciated auntie beeb as much as I did after coming home from a long stay in the former colony. To be able to watch/listen to something without a bloody advert in what feels like every 5 minutes. People may moan about the BBC, but they really don't know how lucky they are to have it.

'The light at the end of the tunnel was the light of an oncoming train'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when SIRIUS and XM merge they should do a deal with the BBC to have all their channels and maybe some internet access. SRIUS have Radio 1 and it's really hard to listen and have them tell you to look at the videos, etc online and you can't because we're outside the UK. There's at least 6 million who have it aswell. That's not even counting the Dish people I don't think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when SIRIUS and XM merge they should do a deal with the BBC to have all their channels and maybe some internet access. SRIUS have Radio 1 and it's really hard to listen and have them tell you to look at the videos, etc online and you can't because we're outside the UK.

But this is coding the BBC make. It's stuff that is used on BBC News and every other BBC minisite. I doubt the coders are going to make an exception just for those in America who get R1. For example there's a lot of rights issues, especially with the Big Weekend videos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah and why should Americans get it but not the rest of the world? America's no better than any other country as far as the BBC are concerned so they can't have one rule for America and one rule for everyone else outside the UK

Gordon Brown says there's light at the end of the tunnel..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to be able to watch some of the stuff on Fox etc so I think there should be a way we could all get what we want. Don't see it happening any time soon though :(

Do the Proxy's work the other way to let us watch stuff off of American sites?[/TECHNOPHOBE]

I assume that's how my brother manages it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what right does radio 1 have to prevent us seeing certain videos from the big weekend: we're listeners too! :cry:

It's a covert plot to get back at the US for inflicting that retard Bush on the rest of the world.;):D

'The light at the end of the tunnel was the light of an oncoming train'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Right so prediction time. I think “Summer on Radio 1” which is on the schedule for Friday to Sunday 1-4 from June sticks around longer than the other changes in July. I think that lasts until September which is when we get the new weekend afternoon show. I think they’ll want to give Danny longer on air to see if they improve. I can’t see that happening, so my guess is in September they move Sam & Danni to weekend afternoons (at that point they’ll have been on weekend breakfast for a full year), and they bring James Cusack in to do weekend breakfast. 
    • If Aled decides to give Danny a full time role, even as part of a duo / trio, it'll be the most disappointing decision of his tenure. The fact Danny is still on air and hasn't been quietly moved on 'due to a change in plan' is bad enough!
    • I'd say Danny has been given a fair hearing - and hasn't been up to par. You don't want Radio 1 to be a closed shop - but not being able to usually get the Whatsapp number right should be a dealbreaker. Errors happen even to the best DJs at times but if you can't get the Whatsapp number right you really shouldn't have a regular role on the station. But if they really are that desperate to have Danny on the schedule full-time then pair him up with somebody who can actually handle the technical side. You think of all the capable DJs who are in duos and trios and then you have just have a rookie like Danny left solo.  The LGBTQ+ point too I have to say if true as a gay man feels a case of proper discrimination. It's good to have LGBTQ+ representation for sure but the key thing is that the DJ is good at the end of the day and say in 2021 there was loads of LGBTQ+ talent on Radio 1 in Scott, Grimmy and Adele Roberts among others but at the end of the day they were strong DJs entirely there on merit. And even now there's still LGBTQ+ talent on Radio 1 who are there primarily because they're bloody good broadcasters. Danny is not one of them.
    • There is a reason you don't know who is doing weekend afternoons yet. The plan is still to see how Danny Beard's trial goes on weekend mornings. Newspaper clippings have demonstrated Aled has been keen to push Danny Beard at the weekend and to give him a fair hearing. The plan looks to be to wait and see whether he improves in the next few weeks. The bosses still want more LBGTQ+ representation on the station.
    • I think they should just bring that back as was. It's been nearly 20 years, so do it with a whole bunch of new DJ's. 
    • I think this year has taught us we know nothing 🙂 Nobody would ever have credibly predicted Jordan leaving and all the changes that followed.   I have another interest outside radio and it is exactly the same - the stuff you never expect to happen is exactly what does.
    • Yeah they make the weekend shifts go so much quicker. Like today, the piece about Matt falling asleep in the cafe was funny, it's clear to see why they're going to weekdays. It could well be they were thinking of Danny for it and like you say have decided against that, or like I said at the start it's James Cusack and the slow down on the announcement is him getting out of his contract. Remember he works for radio 1's main rivals. I think it's quite telling that he's doing more r1 cover than usual, tomorrow and then a further 3 weekend shows in a row
    • Nat in for Dean with Vicky between the 28th-30th May.
    • I suspect they’re gonna tie the announcement into something, or they’ve changed plans. I know we’ve said it as a joke but I wonder if Aled was planning on giving it to someone like Danny Beard, but he’s decided against that after the last few weeks. Seems clear to me, though, that if Jordan hadn’t left, then Katie would’ve taken Dean and Vicky’s slot and Matt and Mollie would’ve stayed on weekends, which probably explains why they haven’t picked a replacement yet. If it was going to be the obvious choice, I.e. James Cusack, surely they would’ve announced it by now..?
    • Yep think they mentioned that this is their penultimate weekend of shows but then they will also be on air during Big Weekend and they mentioned they'll be doing 'Party Anthems' on stage during Big Weekend which sounds intriguing. Will miss Matt & Mollie on weekends - they in particular have made that Friday afternoon slot their own - but they'll be great on weekdays. Do wonder if 'Summer on Radio 1' is just a placeholder name until they decide on who will cover the interim. While it's obviously not the case it does feel like they've forgotten there's that weekend afternoon slot to fill given no permenant presenter has been announced for it yet.
    • Zoe Ball is back on the breakfast show on Monday.
    • Just listening to matt and mollie at work and heard them say it's their second to last show on weekends
    • And Arielle mentioned in her Instagram post that her final early breakfast show is the 27th of June - the Thursday before Glastonbury 
    • When Matt covered breakfast on 22nd April, he said their new show was starting in 10 weeks, so that’d be the 1st July.
    • Would love for it to be like the Summer Friday Thing that me and @DC were remisincing about recently. Lots of events going on that could easily form part of it.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/summer/cardiff/thursday/1.shtml
×
×
  • Create New...