Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Russell Brand & Jonathan Ross


E*F*4L

Recommended Posts

The BBC has apologised to actor Andrew Sachs for the "unacceptable and offensive" content of calls made to him by Russell Brand during a radio show.

The Fawlty Towers star was called four times during a prank on Brand's BBC Radio 2 show on 18 October.

The actor's agent said Sachs was "very upset" after Brand and guest Jonathan Ross left lewd messages about the actor's granddaughter on his voicemail.

Brand himself apologised for the offence on his latest show.

He said "you musn't swear on someone's answer phone", but added it was "funny".

A BBC Radio 2 spokeswoman said: "We have received a letter of a complaint from Mr Sachs' agent and would like to sincerely apologise to Mr Sachs for the offence caused.

"We recognise that some of the content broadcast was unacceptable and offensive.

She added: "We are reviewing how this came about and are responding to Mr Sachs personally. We also apologise to listeners for any offence caused."

Sachs, who played Manuel in Fawlty Towers, was expected to be a guest on the programme, but was unable to appear due to unforeseen circumstances.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7692911.stm

"A BBC spokeswoman said the programme received two complaints unrelated to the phone calls, but they have had further complaints since the details of the stunt were publicised. "

Ohhhhhhh lets all jump on the bandwagon & complain :rolleyes:

Mr Sachs didn't even complain until the daily mail contacted him about it,

Also :

"Sachs' granddaughter Georgina, a member of the group 'The Satanic Sluts'. Mr Sachs and his daughter Kate were said to be left deeply upset by the incident"

What about Georgina she doesn't seem bothered about it :rolleyes:

Mr Sachs would have been made aware of Russel's humor before he said he would go on the show & Dennis Norden was also on the show & he was fine with their interview.

i may be being a bit harsh but its his own fault for not answering his mobile phone when he knew the show would be phoning him for the interview.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i may be being a bit harsh but its his own fault for not answering his mobile phone when he knew the show would be phoning him for the interview.

You do have a childish idea of morality considering you're supposed to be almost twice the age of me.

I'd like to think my dentist is going to ring me up one day and do the same thing if I miss an appointment, so I don't see how that is right because it's Russell.

You could argue Mr Sachs was foolish to book an appointment on Brand's show and then get upset about his sense of humour when he hadn't turned up. He must have had an idea what he was like.

But this is national radio, you can't just do things like that. And it is the sort of thing naturally people will get offended by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They definitely crossed the line with the messages but the public are now only making the situation worse. The BBC initially only received 2 complaints from listeners but as soon as it was in the Sunday press yesterday, 50 more complaints have come in. I bet some of those people didn't even listen to the show initially but they thought it would be fun to jump on the bandwagon. How moronic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im not saying what Russel or Jonathan was right or wrong, but in the context of Russel's show what was said is nothing out of the ordinary.

& i don't get the comment you have just added

You do have a childish idea of morality considering you're supposed to be almost twice the age of me.

Mr Sachs was to be on the show to promote a TV show & he didn't answer his phone when he knew that he was going to do a interview & you could say that Russel & Jonathan were just filling time, Moyles does things like this when people are late for his show & i accept that Moyles wouldn't go as far Russel & Jonathan did, but in the context of their show it was just the norm.

they are both risqué people & that is why some people like & others hate them, i listened to the show when it was on at 11pm & i have just listened to the podcast which has the phone call's on, & i wasn't offended by the comments, but i like Russel & Jonathan but if you don't like them you will just jump on-board & complain :rolleyes:

Mr Sachs has now said that he will accept the apologies.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7691938.stm

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BBC Radio 2 News has reported that Jonathan Ross has sent a personal apology to Andrew Sachs.

Let's not forget you can be fined or imprisoned for making abusive calls like that, and any other broadcaster would have been fined by Ofcom and even sacked for such offense.

I'm not saying I took offence, but it cannot be one rule for one, and another rule for another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say when I heard these messages on the Russell Brand podcast last week I thought they were pretty funny, especially the song they sang, but I thought they were fake! I wouldn't fancy actually receiving messages on my voicemail from someone claiming to have slept with my granddaughter.

That said, the show went out over a week ago- why is the fuss just coming up now?

caitlynmac.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say when I heard these messages on the Russell Brand podcast last week I thought they were pretty funny, especially the song they sang, but I thought they were fake! I wouldn't fancy actually receiving messages on my voicemail from someone claiming to have slept with my granddaughter.

That said, the show went out over a week ago- why is the fuss just coming up now?

Because the BBC have been slow to release any statement about the incident. Im sure there would have been a lot go on at BBC Hq over the past week though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the BBC have been slow to release any statement about the incident. Im sure there would have been a lot go on at BBC Hq over the past week though

If this is the case I'm surprised that they didn't pull the podcast in damage limitation- I downloaded it on Thursday night. I know in the past they have not put controversial shows up on the iPlayer.

caitlynmac.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say when I heard these messages on the Russell Brand podcast last week I thought they were pretty funny, especially the song they sang, but I thought they were fake! I wouldn't fancy actually receiving messages on my voicemail from someone claiming to have slept with my granddaughter.

That said, the show went out over a week ago- why is the fuss just coming up now?

i thought they were well funny also :giggle:

at least im not the only one, Russel rules :P

the beeb have now received over 4000 complaints now :rolleyes: by 3998 losers !

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who were the other two?

the original two were the people that complained about the swearing, everyone else that has complained have probably never listened to the show before.

there are lots of things i could complain about if i wanted to by jumping on board with everyone else & saying Oooo thats not nice im going to write to them & complain, if you don't listen to the Russel Brand show should the complaints really be accepted by OFCOM, most people who have complained have only done so because they don't like Brand or Ross & the main issue is that these people think that THEY own the BBC & it should only cater for their needs !

it is more far reaching than the comments made quite a lot of people don't like the BBC & will use any means to undermine it :x it seems very strange that they would rather have free (commercial tv) that contains nothing but crap shows, yet these are the very same people who also complain about the BBC dumbing down, dumbing down to what ? ITV's level ?

Russel was spot on, on his comments about the Mail newspaper :P

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In relation to Russell, the BBC new what to expect when they took him on, this is a man who called George Bush a "retard" at an awards show and dressed up as Osama Bin Laden on MTV the day after 9/11.

Jonathan Ross, however, gets paid a rumoured £6m a year as one of the flagship BBC presenters, and should have known better than to use the langage he did. On the other hand, the show was a pre-record and some of the onus has to lie with the producers who chose to air these segments of the show.

caitlynmac.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked it. Immature, sure. Irresponsible? At a push. But British radio has no life to it and it's nice to see people trying to actually draw some fun out of it by doing things considered outrageous.

Next up, they should go the Howard Stern route and try to invade whatever public appearance Andrew is doing that night.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me immature but I couldn't help but find the whole thing funny, here's the incident in two parts on Youtube for anyone that wants a listen (WARNING, there is swearing in this):

Part 1 - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=U7IHJ66wj9g

Part 2 - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=uAxPkcnlyNM

I'm not excusing their behaviour at all, if an ordinary member of the public did it they would be arrested for harrassment but surely the idea of Russell Brand pulling a stunt like that shouldn't be a massive shock? In fact he got the sack for the MTV 9/11 thing Kitty mentioned, it's just typical of this country who literally sit around waiting to get "offended" by something just so they can complain about it. I didn't find it particularly offensive myself but obviously it must be for the people on the recieving end of this.

kyliewilson.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gordon Brown has called the calls 'inappropriate and unacceptable'.

Clearly it was a stupid Prank but why is he gettin involved? any excuse to take the focus off him.

I did wonder why he's decided to wade in and get involved. Trying to distract people from the serious issues like the economy. I'm not blaming him for our entire economic situation, but he should be facing up to it, not trying to hide it behind criticism of the BBC.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it just me or is the whole thing getting properly rediculous now?

10,000 people have complained! and the prime minister getting involved? surely everyone has bigger problems than russell brand? Russell and Jonathan should apologise and maybe get told off but then get over it. I wasn't even that shocked when i heard it, thought it was pretty standard for that show to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far I've found this whole incident rather tiresome and Gordon Brown shuffling in to scold the accused for their misdeed because things are not going his way is simply too pathetic.

As far as I'm concerned the matter should be left with the BBC to investigate and resolve on its own, following the proper procedures and in direct accordance with the guidelines specific to such matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far I've found this whole incident rather tiresome and Gordon Brown shuffling in to scold the accused for their misdeed because things are not going his way is simply too pathetic.

As far as I'm concerned the matter should be left with the BBC to investigate and resolve on its own, following the proper procedures and in direct accordance with the guidelines specific to such matters.

Amen to that.

>> I'm on here every now and again... <<

http://www.offthechartradio.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are clearly more evil than Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin and Igor from count duckula. I think the only only way to sort this mess out is for them to be burnt on national television and JRs first born sacrificed on the steps of the Daily "hate" Mail :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Is there really so little going on in the world right now that what Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross said to an actor over the phone on a radio show is not just the day's top story, but the top political story of the day as well? To suggest that this phony, invented scandal, just as invented as the Sun's attempts to smear Katy Perry because she dared to pose three years ago in the company of a knife has been spectacularly blown out of all proportion is an incredible understatement.

Two people complained mostly about the swearing then 10 days later the DM incites mad old pensioners & beeb haters who probably have never heard of Russell Brand never mind were listening at the time.

Download the Adam and Joe & Jon Richardson podcasts now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think this year has taught us we know nothing 🙂 Nobody would ever have credibly predicted Jordan leaving and all the changes that followed.   I have another interest outside radio and it is exactly the same - the stuff you never expect to happen is exactly what does.
    • Yeah they make the weekend shifts go so much quicker. Like today, the piece about Matt falling asleep in the cafe was funny, it's clear to see why they're going to weekdays. It could well be they were thinking of Danny for it and like you say have decided against that, or like I said at the start it's James Cusack and the slow down on the announcement is him getting out of his contract. Remember he works for radio 1's main rivals. I think it's quite telling that he's doing more r1 cover than usual, tomorrow and then a further 3 weekend shows in a row
    • Nat in for Dean with Vicky between the 28th-30th May.
    • I suspect they’re gonna tie the announcement into something, or they’ve changed plans. I know we’ve said it as a joke but I wonder if Aled was planning on giving it to someone like Danny Beard, but he’s decided against that after the last few weeks. Seems clear to me, though, that if Jordan hadn’t left, then Katie would’ve taken Dean and Vicky’s slot and Matt and Mollie would’ve stayed on weekends, which probably explains why they haven’t picked a replacement yet. If it was going to be the obvious choice, I.e. James Cusack, surely they would’ve announced it by now..?
    • Yep think they mentioned that this is their penultimate weekend of shows but then they will also be on air during Big Weekend and they mentioned they'll be doing 'Party Anthems' on stage during Big Weekend which sounds intriguing. Will miss Matt & Mollie on weekends - they in particular have made that Friday afternoon slot their own - but they'll be great on weekdays. Do wonder if 'Summer on Radio 1' is just a placeholder name until they decide on who will cover the interim. While it's obviously not the case it does feel like they've forgotten there's that weekend afternoon slot to fill given no permenant presenter has been announced for it yet.
    • Zoe Ball is back on the breakfast show on Monday.
    • Just listening to matt and mollie at work and heard them say it's their second to last show on weekends
    • And Arielle mentioned in her Instagram post that her final early breakfast show is the 27th of June - the Thursday before Glastonbury 
    • When Matt covered breakfast on 22nd April, he said their new show was starting in 10 weeks, so that’d be the 1st July.
    • Would love for it to be like the Summer Friday Thing that me and @DC were remisincing about recently. Lots of events going on that could easily form part of it.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/radio1/summer/cardiff/thursday/1.shtml
    • I'm guessing there is also a stack of weekend events like Glastonbury
    • I think more likely it'll just be a temp presenter for weekends 1-4 to give Matt & Mollie time off, plus time to plan and pilot the new show.
    • Yeah I don’t think they’ll be anything that drastic - maybe a week or 2 of cover on early breakfast etc, but maybe just having that weekend afternoon slot covered over the summer means they can put someone on from September who maybe isn’t available until then? 
    • But they said the main changes would happen in July.
    • But they said the main changes would happen in July.
×
×
  • Create New...