Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Russell Brand & Jonathan Ross


E*F*4L

Recommended Posts

The BBC has apologised to actor Andrew Sachs for the "unacceptable and offensive" content of calls made to him by Russell Brand during a radio show.

The Fawlty Towers star was called four times during a prank on Brand's BBC Radio 2 show on 18 October.

The actor's agent said Sachs was "very upset" after Brand and guest Jonathan Ross left lewd messages about the actor's granddaughter on his voicemail.

Brand himself apologised for the offence on his latest show.

He said "you musn't swear on someone's answer phone", but added it was "funny".

A BBC Radio 2 spokeswoman said: "We have received a letter of a complaint from Mr Sachs' agent and would like to sincerely apologise to Mr Sachs for the offence caused.

"We recognise that some of the content broadcast was unacceptable and offensive.

She added: "We are reviewing how this came about and are responding to Mr Sachs personally. We also apologise to listeners for any offence caused."

Sachs, who played Manuel in Fawlty Towers, was expected to be a guest on the programme, but was unable to appear due to unforeseen circumstances.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7692911.stm

"A BBC spokeswoman said the programme received two complaints unrelated to the phone calls, but they have had further complaints since the details of the stunt were publicised. "

Ohhhhhhh lets all jump on the bandwagon & complain :rolleyes:

Mr Sachs didn't even complain until the daily mail contacted him about it,

Also :

"Sachs' granddaughter Georgina, a member of the group 'The Satanic Sluts'. Mr Sachs and his daughter Kate were said to be left deeply upset by the incident"

What about Georgina she doesn't seem bothered about it :rolleyes:

Mr Sachs would have been made aware of Russel's humor before he said he would go on the show & Dennis Norden was also on the show & he was fine with their interview.

i may be being a bit harsh but its his own fault for not answering his mobile phone when he knew the show would be phoning him for the interview.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i may be being a bit harsh but its his own fault for not answering his mobile phone when he knew the show would be phoning him for the interview.

You do have a childish idea of morality considering you're supposed to be almost twice the age of me.

I'd like to think my dentist is going to ring me up one day and do the same thing if I miss an appointment, so I don't see how that is right because it's Russell.

You could argue Mr Sachs was foolish to book an appointment on Brand's show and then get upset about his sense of humour when he hadn't turned up. He must have had an idea what he was like.

But this is national radio, you can't just do things like that. And it is the sort of thing naturally people will get offended by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They definitely crossed the line with the messages but the public are now only making the situation worse. The BBC initially only received 2 complaints from listeners but as soon as it was in the Sunday press yesterday, 50 more complaints have come in. I bet some of those people didn't even listen to the show initially but they thought it would be fun to jump on the bandwagon. How moronic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im not saying what Russel or Jonathan was right or wrong, but in the context of Russel's show what was said is nothing out of the ordinary.

& i don't get the comment you have just added

You do have a childish idea of morality considering you're supposed to be almost twice the age of me.

Mr Sachs was to be on the show to promote a TV show & he didn't answer his phone when he knew that he was going to do a interview & you could say that Russel & Jonathan were just filling time, Moyles does things like this when people are late for his show & i accept that Moyles wouldn't go as far Russel & Jonathan did, but in the context of their show it was just the norm.

they are both risqué people & that is why some people like & others hate them, i listened to the show when it was on at 11pm & i have just listened to the podcast which has the phone call's on, & i wasn't offended by the comments, but i like Russel & Jonathan but if you don't like them you will just jump on-board & complain :rolleyes:

Mr Sachs has now said that he will accept the apologies.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7691938.stm

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BBC Radio 2 News has reported that Jonathan Ross has sent a personal apology to Andrew Sachs.

Let's not forget you can be fined or imprisoned for making abusive calls like that, and any other broadcaster would have been fined by Ofcom and even sacked for such offense.

I'm not saying I took offence, but it cannot be one rule for one, and another rule for another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say when I heard these messages on the Russell Brand podcast last week I thought they were pretty funny, especially the song they sang, but I thought they were fake! I wouldn't fancy actually receiving messages on my voicemail from someone claiming to have slept with my granddaughter.

That said, the show went out over a week ago- why is the fuss just coming up now?

caitlynmac.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say when I heard these messages on the Russell Brand podcast last week I thought they were pretty funny, especially the song they sang, but I thought they were fake! I wouldn't fancy actually receiving messages on my voicemail from someone claiming to have slept with my granddaughter.

That said, the show went out over a week ago- why is the fuss just coming up now?

Because the BBC have been slow to release any statement about the incident. Im sure there would have been a lot go on at BBC Hq over the past week though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the BBC have been slow to release any statement about the incident. Im sure there would have been a lot go on at BBC Hq over the past week though

If this is the case I'm surprised that they didn't pull the podcast in damage limitation- I downloaded it on Thursday night. I know in the past they have not put controversial shows up on the iPlayer.

caitlynmac.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say when I heard these messages on the Russell Brand podcast last week I thought they were pretty funny, especially the song they sang, but I thought they were fake! I wouldn't fancy actually receiving messages on my voicemail from someone claiming to have slept with my granddaughter.

That said, the show went out over a week ago- why is the fuss just coming up now?

i thought they were well funny also :giggle:

at least im not the only one, Russel rules :P

the beeb have now received over 4000 complaints now :rolleyes: by 3998 losers !

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who were the other two?

the original two were the people that complained about the swearing, everyone else that has complained have probably never listened to the show before.

there are lots of things i could complain about if i wanted to by jumping on board with everyone else & saying Oooo thats not nice im going to write to them & complain, if you don't listen to the Russel Brand show should the complaints really be accepted by OFCOM, most people who have complained have only done so because they don't like Brand or Ross & the main issue is that these people think that THEY own the BBC & it should only cater for their needs !

it is more far reaching than the comments made quite a lot of people don't like the BBC & will use any means to undermine it :x it seems very strange that they would rather have free (commercial tv) that contains nothing but crap shows, yet these are the very same people who also complain about the BBC dumbing down, dumbing down to what ? ITV's level ?

Russel was spot on, on his comments about the Mail newspaper :P

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In relation to Russell, the BBC new what to expect when they took him on, this is a man who called George Bush a "retard" at an awards show and dressed up as Osama Bin Laden on MTV the day after 9/11.

Jonathan Ross, however, gets paid a rumoured £6m a year as one of the flagship BBC presenters, and should have known better than to use the langage he did. On the other hand, the show was a pre-record and some of the onus has to lie with the producers who chose to air these segments of the show.

caitlynmac.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I liked it. Immature, sure. Irresponsible? At a push. But British radio has no life to it and it's nice to see people trying to actually draw some fun out of it by doing things considered outrageous.

Next up, they should go the Howard Stern route and try to invade whatever public appearance Andrew is doing that night.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me immature but I couldn't help but find the whole thing funny, here's the incident in two parts on Youtube for anyone that wants a listen (WARNING, there is swearing in this):

Part 1 - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=U7IHJ66wj9g

Part 2 - http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=uAxPkcnlyNM

I'm not excusing their behaviour at all, if an ordinary member of the public did it they would be arrested for harrassment but surely the idea of Russell Brand pulling a stunt like that shouldn't be a massive shock? In fact he got the sack for the MTV 9/11 thing Kitty mentioned, it's just typical of this country who literally sit around waiting to get "offended" by something just so they can complain about it. I didn't find it particularly offensive myself but obviously it must be for the people on the recieving end of this.

kyliewilson.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gordon Brown has called the calls 'inappropriate and unacceptable'.

Clearly it was a stupid Prank but why is he gettin involved? any excuse to take the focus off him.

I did wonder why he's decided to wade in and get involved. Trying to distract people from the serious issues like the economy. I'm not blaming him for our entire economic situation, but he should be facing up to it, not trying to hide it behind criticism of the BBC.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

is it just me or is the whole thing getting properly rediculous now?

10,000 people have complained! and the prime minister getting involved? surely everyone has bigger problems than russell brand? Russell and Jonathan should apologise and maybe get told off but then get over it. I wasn't even that shocked when i heard it, thought it was pretty standard for that show to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far I've found this whole incident rather tiresome and Gordon Brown shuffling in to scold the accused for their misdeed because things are not going his way is simply too pathetic.

As far as I'm concerned the matter should be left with the BBC to investigate and resolve on its own, following the proper procedures and in direct accordance with the guidelines specific to such matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So far I've found this whole incident rather tiresome and Gordon Brown shuffling in to scold the accused for their misdeed because things are not going his way is simply too pathetic.

As far as I'm concerned the matter should be left with the BBC to investigate and resolve on its own, following the proper procedures and in direct accordance with the guidelines specific to such matters.

Amen to that.

>> I'm on here every now and again... <<

http://www.offthechartradio.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are clearly more evil than Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin and Igor from count duckula. I think the only only way to sort this mess out is for them to be burnt on national television and JRs first born sacrificed on the steps of the Daily "hate" Mail :rolleyes::rolleyes:

Is there really so little going on in the world right now that what Russell Brand and Jonathan Ross said to an actor over the phone on a radio show is not just the day's top story, but the top political story of the day as well? To suggest that this phony, invented scandal, just as invented as the Sun's attempts to smear Katy Perry because she dared to pose three years ago in the company of a knife has been spectacularly blown out of all proportion is an incredible understatement.

Two people complained mostly about the swearing then 10 days later the DM incites mad old pensioners & beeb haters who probably have never heard of Russell Brand never mind were listening at the time.

Download the Adam and Joe & Jon Richardson podcasts now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • When Scott and Chris announced their departure from R1, I remember there was lots of speculation about who would take over the 1pm slot. Matt and Mollie were talked about a lot on here, and at the time I really didn't rate them as a replacement. A few years on, I see that I was totally wrong. They are such a good pairing, and it's the same kind of duo as Scott and Chris, in that they are real life friends, who spend time together in their real lives, which really does come across on air. True friends having a laugh together, and everyone is invited is how it feels to me now. I never thought about it before, but I agree with @coffeeandgin that Mollie is the Scott of the duo - pop obsessed and maybe a litte ditsy, but so funny, and in need of someone to anchor to or bounce off.  It seems that Matt is the kind of Chris of the duo then in that comparison, the one with the ideas, but also needs another person to make the magic happen. I know I'm outside of the R1 demographic, and maybe Dean and Vicky were meant to be younger and fresher, but I'm sure in my younger years I would have preferred to listen to two people who had a genuine connection and could really make each other laugh, as well as have the listeners laugh along. That was the Scott and Chris factor for me, and I think the only pair that come close to that now are Matt and Mollie.
    • Find Noah Kahan is just busker music. I mean I was pleasantly surprised that Ezra collective were in session for Jack Saunders on his new shoes and he is playing their latest track wouldn’t have thought few years back that at 6pm in the evening jazz music would be played. I hope if can get the green light and launch the 00s/10s station that the focus is on more new music be it pop mainstream and alternative genres on the main 1
    • Scott's show is perfect for the office. If Matt and Mol have a podcast I'd listen to that. All the fun without the Gen Z rappers. 
    • Similar to SZA’s Kill Bill, the word “kill” had been initially cut out of Taylor Swift’s Fortnight. But it seems like they are now playing an unedited version.
    • Also hopefully won't get my head bitten off for this but I'd say of the current Radio 1 DJs the one arguably most similar to Scott Mills's latter time on Radio 1 would be Mollie. I'm not saying she's as good as Scott was to be clear but she is that sort of vibe. 'Future Pop' is exactly the sort of music Scott would be championing and you can tell Mollie has the same passion for it that Scott did. There's that Party Anthems link too - a show Matt & Mol do that previously Scott did and they bring a similar energy to how Scott did that makes it a fun listen. Matt & Mollie seem to just have that natural connection with the listeners that Scott & Chris did that you can't manufacture.
    • I find at the minute I'm a bit of a nomad when it comes to radio stations. Often the Radio 1 playlist really doesn't appeal to me these days and I did wonder is it just me tiring of new music but then I'll listen to Future Pop and Party Anthems and there's loads of tunes on there that I love and they're excellent listens but just too few of those make it to the playlist. Radio 2 may arguably be more to my taste music wise but also often feels too rooted on the past. Plus much of the content just doesn't appeal to me and verges on the 'mumsy' side. Plus Radio 2's new music can feel very 'middle of the road' - just because I don't enjoy some of the Radio 1 new stuff it doesn't mean I want Take That & Will Young as 'new music'. For me currently if I'm tuning in for radio it'll be Jordan North on Capital Breakfast, on Radio 1 Matt & Mollie, (if Jamie is off)  Going Home and Sam & Danni plus there's also Capital Dance and Mistajam. They all hit the mark for me in a way other shows don't.
    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
×
×
  • Create New...