Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Radio 1 slipping out of its age remit


Jono

Recommended Posts

Commercial radio executives are to call for an overhaul of BBC Radio 1, arguing that the station has breached its remit and is eating into their audience.

The commercial radio sector's trade body, the RadioCentre, claims the average age of Radio 1 listeners is 33, above the 15- to 29-year-old target age range specified in the station's radio service licence.

In its submission to the BBC Trust's review of the corporation's youth services, the RadioCentre is expected to say that Radio 1's DJ lineup and music policy should be changed to better reflect the interests of a younger audience.

"The Radio 1 service licence says it should appeal to 15- to 29-year-olds - an average audience age of 22 - but the average listener, according to the latest Rajars, is 33," said Andrew Harrison, the chief executive of the RadioCentre.

"The service licence is designed to appeal to young people, yet the service delivery is much older than that and right in the heartland of the commercial radio audience," Harrison added.

"If a commercial station was operating so far outside its format it would be a breach of its licence. It would be fined by Ofcom and obliged to change its format."

The RadioCentre is still finalising its submission to the BBC Trust's review of the corporation's services for children and young people. Announced at the beginning of this year, the consultation period will end on December 16.

"BBC Radio 2 is drifting younger and Radio 1 is drifting older, both into the heartland of commercial radio," said Harrison.

He added that there should be a change in the age and profile of Radio 1's presenters and the appeal of its music towards a younger generation.

"Radio 1's service should serve young people and stick to its service licence," Harrison said.

John Myers, the outgoing chief executive of GMG Radio, part of Guardian Media Group which also publishes MediaGuardian.co.uk, said: "The biggest fear for me going forward is the creep of Radio 1 going older. It is supposed to be a station for the youth and going forward it is just unsustainable in its present form.

"One of the reasons is [breakfast DJ] Chris Moyles, who appeals to a wide church of demographics just because his humour is so broad.

"At the moment I'm asking myself who is broadcasting to the young people who are the future of radio in the UK.

"If it doesn't realign itself then the BBC politically will find it very difficult to put the case forward that it is a public service broadcaster."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/24/commercialradio-bbc?commentpage=1&commentposted=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think that the natural audience will get older- people who have grown up with it have a loyalty to the station and continue to listen.

I would say that parts of the station are definitely aiming at a younger audience- at 23 I find some of the programming doesn't really appeal to me.

However, I do feel that most of the evening programming is directed at a more mature audience.

I also agree with the comments about Radio 2 getting "younger"- certainly programmes like Russell Brand don't seem to fit in with the traditional ethos of the station.

caitlynmac.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got to agree with one of the comments...

Radio 1 isn't a lonely computer churning out the same 30 over tired songs, only allowing a 'presenter' to speak for 15 seconds three times an hour (usually to tell me how wacky the breakfast show was and how it will be even wackier tomorrow) each time being immediately followed by higher volume shouting adverts and trailers usually recorded by people who sound like they are suffering extreme nasal problems. That's commercial radio, and why it makes me suicidal trying to listen to it.

Ouch...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The merger of GCAP with Global Radio has only made things worse. Radio Broadland, along with other local radio stations, will now become 'Heart Radio Norwich'. So there's likely to be less local radio content. The only reason I tuned in was for the local content, now there's none of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't radio 1 had this problem since the beginning of time?

Most people I know listen to a local station- Ram FM because it keeps them up to date with football which I couldn't care less about. I can't stand radio ads which is why I'm a radio 1er. How do they knew the average age? They didn't ask me how old I was.

The geek formally known as Scott Mills Guru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They cant make the content less mature without it becoming cheesy. Their presenters are mainly over the target age bracket. Its alway going to be hard appealing to an age range, people like different things, and even if they did change to try and target the younger audience there will still be older people wanting to listen and enjoying it. Younger people listen to Ipods now days :-P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't radio 1 had this problem since the beginning of time?

Most people I know listen to a local station- Ram FM because it keeps them up to date with football which I couldn't care less about. I can't stand radio ads which is why I'm a radio 1er. How do they knew the average age? They didn't ask me how old I was.

You put your age on the RAJAR listening diary...

I remember Moyles talking once about if your under a certain age then you aren't considered in the RAJARS. Wont this pull up the average listening age anyway.

I really don't think R1 should change their format, talking to us in a very patronising way like we are all primary schoolers will certainly make me tune out. I am at the bottom of the demographic and I really think the format is excellent, and so do a lot of people in my year as it seems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This kind of stuff winds me up. There are many more people in this country who are 30+ so even though we have a very high percentage of 15 - 20 year olds (and many more either side) as long as there are are 30+ (or more dramatically 40/50+) then it's going to pull our average out of the age group.

Surely with 1.5 million 12-18 year olds listening to our show what the grumpy people who produced that report SHOULD be saying is stop the older people listening rather than make Radio 1 more relevant to the younger audience? Radio 1 once tried that years ago and it was awful. They became too cool for school and I, for one, stopped listening as a young teenager. I'd never want that again. That would bring the average down again.

haven't the people who made that report heard Switch or the Surgery? Seen Switch Live or the summer tour? They'd realise we do a lot for our younger audience!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that the natural audience will get older- people who have grown up with it have a loyalty to the station and continue to listen.

.

Good point. I've listened since 1983 (approx.) until the present day. There's a large amount of stuff for the very young, and there's good stuff for us oldies. How do you keep a station "really young"? People tune in for a variety of reasons: I do so for the new music, and all the fun and laughter which is lacking elsewhere. Hmmm.

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well what do they suggest to appeal to the teens? 14 and 15 year olds doing Scotts show? It would go down the pan. This commercial radio thingy is just global radio trying to get more listeners as they are struggling to keep Xfm and their bosses huge bonuses

Gordon Brown says there's light at the end of the tunnel..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well radio one has in the past got too old. They found it impossible to sack djs. Think of how they could not get rid of people like DLT. He was well past his sell by date. You could argue that the age of the djs is quite old. Quite a few are oer 40 and even 50. BUt westwood is still appealing to ayoung audience.

I think society has changed. Those over retirement age grew up in the sixties... smoked dope and still have liberal ideas. So radio two is starting to get younger.

I am over 40 myself. I tune into radio one religiously in recent years. But its largely because of the playlist. I think that there is a lot of good pop and rock music about. I used to hate radio one when I was young. It was just image led rubbish. The djs make little difference. I like the music. So if radio one wants to lose me then they will have to change the play list.

Comercial radio will do anything to get an advantage. They have crap presenters and boring shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The djs make little difference. I like the music. So if radio one wants to lose me then they will have to change the play list.

Comercial radio will do anything to get an advantage. They have crap presenters and boring shows.

You're contradicting yourself a little bit.

So you don't like presenters on Radio One because they make no difference, but on Commercial Radio, where the presenters talk less, it's more important?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of the DJs, I think it's hard for Radio 1 as they have such a large amount of listeners they need DJs who are experienced and professional, so this often means that they have to be older than the target audience.

That said, Greg is quite a newbie to the presenting game and I think he has one of the best shows on Radio 1.

caitlynmac.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am well over the age remit. Yet to be honest my favorite dj is gregg james and he is just twnety one.

This kind of stuff winds me up. There are many more people in this country who are 30+ so even though we have a very high percentage of 15 - 20 year olds (and many more either side) as long as there are are 30+ (or more dramatically 40/50+) then it's going to pull our average out of the age group.

Surely with 1.5 million 12-18 year olds listening to our show what the grumpy people who produced that report SHOULD be saying is stop the older people listening rather than make Radio 1 more relevant to the younger audience? Radio 1 once tried that years ago and it was awful. They became too cool for school and I, for one, stopped listening as a young teenager. I'd never want that again. That would bring the average down again.

haven't the people who made that report heard Switch or the Surgery? Seen Switch Live or the summer tour? They'd realise we do a lot for our younger audience!

Hey its aled

I kind of agree. How do you make a show less appealing to a certain age range if the older people are liking exactly the same things as the young

I definitely think music has changed. Its more democratic in this era. The age of the mp3 download has killed the power of the record company. Now bands can make it without contracts. That has surely got to be important. Before radio one was targeting a younger audience based on image. Now its all about the music. Indie bands rule. Its less about image and more about talent. It can appeal to any age range

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a question for the older ones on here.. Simon 38, etc... do you sometimes get put downs from friends because you are still an R1 listener? Recently, at the library, a guy there told me R1 was "just for kids", and what was I doing listening in. I replied I was a "big kid", but he was still less than impressed. Has something similar happened to you?

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a mug in a card shop yesterday, you know those novelty milestone presents. There was a 30 year old one that listed things that show you're 30, one of them was "You know you're 30 when the music on Radio 1 sounds rubbish"

The geek formally known as Scott Mills Guru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw a mug in a card shop yesterday, you know those novelty milestone presents. There was a 30 year old one that listed things that show you're 30, one of them was "You know you're 30 when the music on Radio 1 sounds rubbish"

I think the music R1 plays is good, some of the stuff i don't like but i like more than i don't. Maybe R1 should get Brand ;)

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • When Scott and Chris announced their departure from R1, I remember there was lots of speculation about who would take over the 1pm slot. Matt and Mollie were talked about a lot on here, and at the time I really didn't rate them as a replacement. A few years on, I see that I was totally wrong. They are such a good pairing, and it's the same kind of duo as Scott and Chris, in that they are real life friends, who spend time together in their real lives, which really does come across on air. True friends having a laugh together, and everyone is invited is how it feels to me now. I never thought about it before, but I agree with @coffeeandgin that Mollie is the Scott of the duo - pop obsessed and maybe a litte ditsy, but so funny, and in need of someone to anchor to or bounce off.  It seems that Matt is the kind of Chris of the duo then in that comparison, the one with the ideas, but also needs another person to make the magic happen. I know I'm outside of the R1 demographic, and maybe Dean and Vicky were meant to be younger and fresher, but I'm sure in my younger years I would have preferred to listen to two people who had a genuine connection and could really make each other laugh, as well as have the listeners laugh along. That was the Scott and Chris factor for me, and I think the only pair that come close to that now are Matt and Mollie.
    • Find Noah Kahan is just busker music. I mean I was pleasantly surprised that Ezra collective were in session for Jack Saunders on his new shoes and he is playing their latest track wouldn’t have thought few years back that at 6pm in the evening jazz music would be played. I hope if can get the green light and launch the 00s/10s station that the focus is on more new music be it pop mainstream and alternative genres on the main 1
    • Scott's show is perfect for the office. If Matt and Mol have a podcast I'd listen to that. All the fun without the Gen Z rappers. 
    • Similar to SZA’s Kill Bill, the word “kill” had been initially cut out of Taylor Swift’s Fortnight. But it seems like they are now playing an unedited version.
    • Also hopefully won't get my head bitten off for this but I'd say of the current Radio 1 DJs the one arguably most similar to Scott Mills's latter time on Radio 1 would be Mollie. I'm not saying she's as good as Scott was to be clear but she is that sort of vibe. 'Future Pop' is exactly the sort of music Scott would be championing and you can tell Mollie has the same passion for it that Scott did. There's that Party Anthems link too - a show Matt & Mol do that previously Scott did and they bring a similar energy to how Scott did that makes it a fun listen. Matt & Mollie seem to just have that natural connection with the listeners that Scott & Chris did that you can't manufacture.
    • I find at the minute I'm a bit of a nomad when it comes to radio stations. Often the Radio 1 playlist really doesn't appeal to me these days and I did wonder is it just me tiring of new music but then I'll listen to Future Pop and Party Anthems and there's loads of tunes on there that I love and they're excellent listens but just too few of those make it to the playlist. Radio 2 may arguably be more to my taste music wise but also often feels too rooted on the past. Plus much of the content just doesn't appeal to me and verges on the 'mumsy' side. Plus Radio 2's new music can feel very 'middle of the road' - just because I don't enjoy some of the Radio 1 new stuff it doesn't mean I want Take That & Will Young as 'new music'. For me currently if I'm tuning in for radio it'll be Jordan North on Capital Breakfast, on Radio 1 Matt & Mollie, (if Jamie is off)  Going Home and Sam & Danni plus there's also Capital Dance and Mistajam. They all hit the mark for me in a way other shows don't.
    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
×
×
  • Create New...