Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

BBC News: Driving age 'must increase to 18'


Mike

Recommended Posts

As I said in the "Your Views" thread:

Well luckily I passed my test last week so much of it don't apply to me.

I can agree with the alcohol thing, but the thing I find stupid is banning passengers between 12 and 20 at 11PM to 6AM. What's the point in that? If that law was passed then that would mean I am legally not allowed to give my mates a lift home after 11PM?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think having a mandatory number of lessons might be a good idea. How do they intend to enforce banning new drivers from drinking for a year...? It is true that a lot of 17 year olds are over confident when they get their licence and a lot of people I was at school with had crashes within a short time of getting their licence. There is some sense in these proposals but most people haven't become much more sensible by the time they're 18.

Having said that, I'm 19, and have no intention to learn to drive, so this doesn't really affect me.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand the over-confident thing. What young drivers don't realise is that they have to drive just like they did when they passed their test. With every bit of effort and concentration.

I have no problem with most of the points the MPs have made. I personally think alcohol should be banned for ALL drivers. I support a structured syllabus and extra hazard-perception training.

What I don't agree with though is the illogical idea of "banning drivers from carrying passengers aged between 10 and 20 from 11pm to 5am for a year after passing their test". This to me sounds a bit blinded. Do they seriously want me to abandon my mates late at night and drive home alone? I think parents would much prefer their children getting a lift home from a mate late at night than walking the streets alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the government just love to waste time it seems. they dont care about teenagers, it's just tring to make them look good. and making the do-gooders satisfied and all the old people who go on and on about 'their day' which is long gone.

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true. Though it is possible they might be less tempted to 'show off' to their mates at the time and hence they 'get away' with it, which might account for the lower accident statistics.

I seriously can do nothing but condemn anyone that drinks and drives having experienced first hand what can happen as a result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wont do it, i am sure of that becuase i can give or take drinking. it dosent bother me, so i would just drive somewhere and drink coke. the problem is i dont want to suffer becuase of a bunch of old people trying to look good, especially if i have done nothing wrong.

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why?

If the age went up to 21 there would just be more car theft because people want to try it and feel they can't wait. i mean for crying out loud why don't the government understand that making something really hard to do because of age or whatever will just make peoples thirst to do it bigger?!

Not a very god explanation, but there we go

I mean, why should we have to have a certain ampunt of lessons, what if people are very quick learners? what about if they get a lot of practice. for christs sake why do the government always bobobobo over teenagers WHEN THEY HAVENT DONE ANYTHING WRONG!?!

As i said in your views earlier, people are always gonna want to show off and doing what the government intends to do is just to please the flipping aresholes who control us and who are power hungry. STOP TRYING TO PLEASE YOURSELVES AND MAKING LIFE CRAP FOR THE REST OF US, WHO ONE DAY MAY EVEN BE TAKING OVER YOUR JOB!

I can see this country getting to be like Germany in the Hitler Era.

People rebel, get over it for bobobobos sake, this is england and the more you try and take things away from us, the more we are going to rebel...

Someone let me loose on number 10, pleeeeeeeeaaassssseeeeeeeeee!

>> I'm on here every now and again... <<

http://www.offthechartradio.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't know anyone at 17 who I would have got in a car with. People at that age don't think about things so much.

I don't agree that people are going to steal more cars if the age is raised either. It's like people drinking underage- if you have parents who let you try it etc. then you're far less likely to go out and get drunk when you're too young.

Also, one of my close friends was killed in a car crash by a driver who wasn't over the limit, he just drove like an idiot. She was 17.

A certain amount of time in a car learning to drive is a good idea, no matter how quickly you learn. It doesn't make you a good driver just because you can learn quickly.

Of course, if I had my way then public transport would be far far better and we'd all have less need for a car and then be helping the environment too.

There/ They're/ Their. Different words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair enough you have your own views die to personal experiences, apologies if i offended you.

If i had it my way:

16: Learn to drive

17: Test

21: Allowed to drink to the legal limit and drive.

I fail to see the way 10 - 20 year olds will not allowed to be passengers in cars at night. What a pathetic rule.

>> I'm on here every now and again... <<

http://www.offthechartradio.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why not target ALL drivers? I'd support regular retests as I think people that have been on the road a long time can be just as dangerous as a comparatively inexperienced teenager...

This would help reduce the carbon footprint as older people returned to the joys of cycling - most older drivers wouldn't take another test if they could help it. If the government wants to stop bad driving it should bring in compulsory re-tests for convicted offenders, it'd be a massive deterrent.

I hate generalisations based on age.There are many many different types of people from different types of background with greater or lesser susceptibility to showing off or being distracted.

You get some middle aged boy racers and some Mums who get ratty and distracted when their children are playing up in the back seat. You get some young lads and girls who want to show off in their cars too. But it's wrong to stereotype all young people or all old people or all middle aged people or all of a racial group or one or other gender or orientation. If we're honest we all do it in our heads, it's human nature. But it should be fiercly fought against, just like that urge to race after the guy who cut you up and signal your disapproval with a finger...

UM is a nice place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A certain amount of time in a car learning to drive is a good idea, no matter how quickly you learn. It doesn't make you a good driver just because you can learn quickly.

Good point - they do say most people only really learn to drive and cope with all 'normal' road situations about a year after passing their test...

It's terrible that most of us at some point are going to know someone involved in a fatal car crash, and anything that can be done to reduce this - for ALL drivers of all ages and levels of experience - can only be a good thing. I think any restrictive sanctions are better aimed at the whole motoring populace, not just younger drivers. Bring on the 5-yearly retests!

None of this will of course have any effect on those that choose to drive without licenses or insurance, on which don't even get me started...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Radio 1 at Parklife will be presented by Vicky and Nat. Nat is currently listed to present her usual Sunday show on that weekend but I imagine that will change and someone else will be doing it instead. The Radio 1 presenters at Download will be Daniel P Carter, Jack Saunders, Alyx Holcombe and Nels Hylton.
    • Nat in for Dean with Vicky as well that day.
    • So the end of weekend afternoons this week - new show is July 1st.
    • Arielle is in for Greg on Monday 27th May.
    • He’s definitely gotten better and the show has sounded fine this week. I think it been at its best when it’s been Katie and Jamie or Vick and Katie. Vick and Jamie are ok together, but I do think the show sounds better when it’s Vick and Katie and therefore I still don’t really understand the point of the trio.    Jamie is, however, a lot better than Danny Beard! 
    • The RAJAR coming on later this year reflecting later summer to autumn will be interesting to how it reflects Matt and Mollie in afternoons to the revised changes on radio 1’s new music slots and the schedule re-shuffling Radio 3 introducing a new slate of programmes. Then, later on this year have speech radio stations having domestic political coverage of the election but also America’s presidential election.  
    • I actually caught snippets of today’s show, and I found it much better than the last time I listened. I have made it no secret that I like Jamie on the radio, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed Matt & him together last year. People have criticised him for not being relatable, but I have to agree with the comment above that I have always found him a naturally warm person to listen to. Maybe the going home set up was something that needed settling in and things are starting to take shape.  It must have been difficult for him joining an established duo in Vick & Katie to begin with.  Jamie was great on something songs today, fully engaged in the caller and sounded like a real presenter. Maybe he is doing as a lot of us hoped and really learning as he goes, how to do it properly. 
    • Agree with this. The anti-Jamie feeling was IMO quite influenced by the negativity around him replacing Jordan, since Jordan was exceptional and also universally loved. When people mention Danny and Jamie in the same sentence about bad hiring decisions I almost choke - Jamie may not be perfect but he's several leagues better than Danny already and has bags of potential. Danny is poor and has shown zero potential...
    • Jamie started 4 March, and the figures only going up to 31 March, so it isn't reliable. But it has shown the numbers have dropped in afternoons compared to last quarter. It looks like it's Capital's gain.
    • Do these audience figures reflect Jordan leaving and Jamie replacing him?
    • I think Jamie is really starting to settle into the role well. He comes across as really warm, and genuinely invested in the listeners when he’s talking to them which is nice. I think he’s building a really great relationship with Vicki and Katie too. His recent great company podcast is great too, where he has quite a deep chat with someone new each week. He’s clearly a very genuine person and I think he has some real potential.
    • Most probably. But do wonder what the future of the relax themed programmes will be when they officially wind down that service.
    • I think it's just to replace Wind Down presents... which was in that timeslot, and I'm guessing Chillout Anthems was just a buffer since it'll still be played at 06:00 on Sundays.
    • With listening on the U.K. for the industry in general it is good overall as most stations reach is on the up and shows radio to be more sustainable and stable outlet than linear televisions channels. This RAJAR I think with the increase shift to DAB+ the BBC will be able to say it has it’s audiences for the proposed new stations it wishes to launch and think the new innovative ideas that it seems Jack himself can take credit for on the new music show think the younger under 30 gen z demographic could increase se in that time-slot. 
    • Conor Knight is in for Sam & Danni on Saturday 8th & Sunday 9th June. It's Radio 1 at Parklife, 13.00-16.00 on Saturday 8th & Sunday 9th June. Matt & Mollie are in for Greg from Monday 10th to Friday 14th June - it's just Matt on the Thursday. It's Radio 1 at Download, 13.00-16.00 on Friday 14th June.
×
×
  • Create New...