Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Cigarette buying age raising to 18


Olly

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

To be honest, I have no idea why I started and I regret it too. Thing is, there are aspects of it that can improve your life. I have loads of friends that I met whilst outside smoking. But it also makes chest infections much worse and your ability to run is screwed, not that it makes much difference to me; I'm too fat to run anywhere!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It also increases the risk of heart disease, cancer etc. etc.

I don't see how there are any positives to it at all.

My dad died just over 3 months ago from a heart attack (at 48 ), and he hadn't smoked for nearly 30 years, wasn't overweight, cholesterol and blood pressure were pretty much normal... anything you do to increase the risk is crazy in my opinion.

Regards,

Olly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why people start smoking. One of my friends does it because he says it relieves stress. He started at about the time he turned 16. He figured I didn't really approve, and since, he's stopped talking to me. It doesn't help that cigarette smoke makes me cough for about a week afterwards. We used to be pretty much best friends, and now I haven't seen or spoken to him in months. He just kind of drifted away. Whenever I saw him, he was completely hammered and chain smoking.

I don't know if it will make a difference raising the age for buying cigarettes. I have personally never seen the appeal of it. It's true: the Government want the tax revenue from cigarettes, so their efforts to stop smoking will be fair half-hearted.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree - but realistically we need something which will have more than a possible slight effect. The only measures which would have a positive, measurable and governable effect would be measures this government - and any other - would never take, like a blanket ban on smoking outside of your own home, or raising the cost to £35 a packet, or refusing NHS cover to smokers......smoking has to be stamped out, not tiptoed around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think that people who smoke and need transplants related to their smoking or drinking should be put at the bottom of the waiting list, there are people who through no fault of their own require transplants. Smoking is self inflicted and if people want to blacken their lungs with tar then let them smoke themselves to death, harsh reality but In my opinion these people had the choice and they obviously picked the wrong one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think that people who smoke and need transplants related to their smoking or drinking should be put at the bottom of the waiting list, there are people who through no fault of their own require transplants.

Oh how very, very deeply I agree with you................

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you still feel the same if the person who smoked and needed a transplant or operation was a member of your family or someone you cared about?

I, as an ex smoker think that it's only right that people who havent taken smoked/drinked in copius amounts should be the priority. I know the damage tobacco can do as it killed both my grandfathers. Certainly one of them died before I was even 8yrs old so he would only have probably been in his 50's/early 60's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you still feel the same if the person who smoked and needed a transplant or operation was a member of your family or someone you cared about?

I think I would, although I understand what you are saying. Not everything in life is easy or pleasant though, and the solution to people killing themselves and costing the NHS millions by smoking is not going to be achieved painlessly.

I've been on a transplant waiting list for two and a half years btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not everything in life is easy or pleasant though...

Is anything? *sigh*

I've been on a transplant waiting list for two and a half years btw.

Which just goes to show, like I said, that not everything is as simple as it seems. Obviously your situation effects how you feel, and other people's past experiences effect how they feel. I don't know what the solution is, but I really do hope that everything works out for you soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that black and white. Should we refuse to pay for health problems caused by obesity as well? Should we refuse to pay for people who break their legs skiing or skateboarding because it was self-inflicted? Should we refuse to treat people who were injured while fighting?

The NHS was set up in 1948 (or thereabouts) to treat everyone for free, and despite its failings, it sort of does that. I had an economics A level question on this last year: should the NHS charge smokers for their treatment. It's difficult to say what health problems are caused by smoking. Some non-smokers get lung cancer, so you can't label something as purely a smokers' problem.

There isn't really any easy answer to the smoking issue. I don't think you can really exclude anyone from the NHS, because it raises too many more issues. At the moment the high tax on cigarettes is supposedly compensating for the additional strain on the NHS but the NHS has huge problems as it is (a completely separate issue though).

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that black and white. Should we refuse to pay for health problems caused by obesity as well? Should we refuse to pay for people who break their legs skiing or skateboarding because it was self-inflicted? Should we refuse to treat people who were injured while fighting?

The NHS was set up in 1948 (or thereabouts) to treat everyone for free, and despite its failings, it sort of does that. I had an economics A level question on this last year: should the NHS charge smokers for their treatment. It's difficult to say what health problems are caused by smoking. Some non-smokers get lung cancer, so you can't label something as purely a smokers' problem.

There isn't really any easy answer to the smoking issue. I don't think you can really exclude anyone from the NHS, because it raises too many more issues. At the moment the high tax on cigarettes is supposedly compensating for the additional strain on the NHS but the NHS has huge problems as it is (a completely separate issue though).

Totally true. I'm well aware that the measures I aspire to are not do-able in this country. But I do believe that it is possible and desirable to go some way towards the idea that those of us who do not deliberately make ourselves ill should not have to continually subsidise those who do. I'm not saying it wouldn't be complex, but I really think it needs to happen.

Also, Bexy (sorry, I still haven't worked out how to quote multiple posts in one reply....!), you're quite right in that my own situation has caused me to think on these subjects more than I might have otherwise, but thankfully neither my condition nor my treatment is affected by any of these issues, so thats a relief!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The Summer on Radio 1 thing makes me wonder whether they might be doing something similar to last year again where they have a temporary schedule over the summer before introducing changes in September - maybe the new host won’t start until after the summer?
    • There was talk on my Big Weekend group from the council about them waiting for Ticketmaster to send an email out. They said they've been waiting a week. Maybe they're waiting for train strike confirmation first. 
    • It’s on Saturday and Friday that week too. I guess this would make sense, as it gives them roughly 6 weeks off weekends until they start the new show?
    • Yeah he's on more than usual including this Sunday and then 3 more shows in May according to the above. Makes me think it's James for the weekend shows also
    • For some reason there is 'Summer on Radio 1' listed on Sunday 2nd June, could this be replacing M&M until July?
    • They seem to be using James more for cover now makes me think it will be him getting weekends eitjer breakfast or 1 till 4 
    • Yep am very much Capital Breakfast now. Jordan, Chris and Sian are a great trio and it's got that feel of the old shows Jordan and Chris used to do on Radio 1. It doesn't take itself too seriously but is packed full of content and slick. With Greg he's great but 6 years in you've probably heard it all before plus frankly I can sit through the Capital Playlist a lot more easily than the Radio 1 playlist (where some of the inclusions and omissions can be quite baffling at times). Plus after things like the Oscars or Met Gala or if there's a particularly big TV show or film or popstar then Greg won't half wang on about it at times. I guess it's partly to be expected with it being a Breakfast show on a young station but it can feel very London bubble and get tired.
    • Ore Olukoga is in for Arielle on Tuesday 14th May. James Cusack is in for Danny Beard on Saturday 1st June. James Cusack is in for Nat on Sunday 2nd June.
    • I honestly never thought in a million years I’d move from Radio 1 to be a regular Capital breakfast show listener. But it’s got pretty much everything I want - 3 really genuine, entertaining mates having a laugh, playing silly games and it all sounds great. I became a big fan of Chris from his days with Scott, became a Jordan fan on Going Home, and Sian Welby is newer to me but is loads of fun too.  It’s great and I’ve shocked myself by transferring my listening at breakfast. For me Greg’s show now feels very tired and it’s time for something new. But with Jordan gone that’s unlikely to happen anytime soon. Greg’s had a great run and I’m a fan - but there’s no new ideas now. I still listen to Radio 1 at other times - but this show feels like very serious competition for Greg. 
    • They have built four new studios to increase capacity, alongside the existing six.  Bearing in mind that some of the output of R1, 1X, R2 & 6M comes from elsewhere, and Asian Network is gradually moving all output to Birmingham, this should be enough!
    • How do they manage to cater for 6Music and Radio 2 on that floor? Did they adapt it? 
    • I think we've all figured out now how much you like it @AndyK77 😂 Personally while I think it's by far the best show on the Capital schedule and better than its predecessor, it still has the shortened songs and other commercial-radio aspects that remind me why I'm a Radio 1 fan. No matter how well this has worked out for Jordan, and all credit to him for landing the job, I can't help but feel that a Jordan and Katie show on R1 breakfast would have been so much better!
    • A few weeks in and I am actually loving the show and Jordan is a nice mix of his old chaotic self and dare I say it a slick jock.
    • He must be in his element. At Eurovision and a Gold award!
    • I really like Rylan, and as much of a fun idea it would be to have Scott and Rylan together, I think Rylan is too much of a main character.  Scott needs a side-kick rather than a full on co-host I think. That’s why he and Chris worked so well, Scott steered the show, and Chris was the perfect person to have alongside him.    I don’t religiously listen to Rylan’s show, but when I do catch it, it’s perfect weekend energy. He has a very warm presenting style too, but something makes me think he and Scott together every day would be a bit too much.     
×
×
  • Create New...