Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Recommended Posts

Posted

I agree with you on the whole - except the bit about not knowing where to go for help. You'd have to be a cretin to miss all the advertising on that subject. Thats more a case of deciding to plead ignorance in order to stay in denial, in my opinion.

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

They frown upon underagers ;)

I dunno, ive never been in the situation where ive needer help for this sorta stuff, but i assume its embarassing to admit you have a problem

Posted

Probably. Apparently nicotine is more chemically addictive than heroin. No wonder its so hard to give up - you've got the chemical addiction to break, plus the social "habit" part of the whole thing. Yet again, I don't know why anyone starts.

Posted

To be honest, I have no idea why I started and I regret it too. Thing is, there are aspects of it that can improve your life. I have loads of friends that I met whilst outside smoking. But it also makes chest infections much worse and your ability to run is screwed, not that it makes much difference to me; I'm too fat to run anywhere!

Posted

It also increases the risk of heart disease, cancer etc. etc.

I don't see how there are any positives to it at all.

My dad died just over 3 months ago from a heart attack (at 48 ), and he hadn't smoked for nearly 30 years, wasn't overweight, cholesterol and blood pressure were pretty much normal... anything you do to increase the risk is crazy in my opinion.

Regards,

Olly.

Posted

I don't know why people start smoking. One of my friends does it because he says it relieves stress. He started at about the time he turned 16. He figured I didn't really approve, and since, he's stopped talking to me. It doesn't help that cigarette smoke makes me cough for about a week afterwards. We used to be pretty much best friends, and now I haven't seen or spoken to him in months. He just kind of drifted away. Whenever I saw him, he was completely hammered and chain smoking.

I don't know if it will make a difference raising the age for buying cigarettes. I have personally never seen the appeal of it. It's true: the Government want the tax revenue from cigarettes, so their efforts to stop smoking will be fair half-hearted.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Posted
Fab idea :) It's a yucky habit to have so would be better if it was more difficult for children to start!!!

Absolutely - but the question is, will raising the age you can legally buy them to 18 actually HAVE that effect? I don't think it will.

Posted

I agree - but realistically we need something which will have more than a possible slight effect. The only measures which would have a positive, measurable and governable effect would be measures this government - and any other - would never take, like a blanket ban on smoking outside of your own home, or raising the cost to £35 a packet, or refusing NHS cover to smokers......smoking has to be stamped out, not tiptoed around.

Posted

Personally I think that people who smoke and need transplants related to their smoking or drinking should be put at the bottom of the waiting list, there are people who through no fault of their own require transplants. Smoking is self inflicted and if people want to blacken their lungs with tar then let them smoke themselves to death, harsh reality but In my opinion these people had the choice and they obviously picked the wrong one.

Posted
Personally I think that people who smoke and need transplants related to their smoking or drinking should be put at the bottom of the waiting list, there are people who through no fault of their own require transplants.

Oh how very, very deeply I agree with you................

Posted
Would you still feel the same if the person who smoked and needed a transplant or operation was a member of your family or someone you cared about?

I, as an ex smoker think that it's only right that people who havent taken smoked/drinked in copius amounts should be the priority. I know the damage tobacco can do as it killed both my grandfathers. Certainly one of them died before I was even 8yrs old so he would only have probably been in his 50's/early 60's.

Posted

I know too, I even made my ex boyfriend give up smoking because I didn't want to see anything like that happen to someone I cared about again.

I just think that there's many factors involved, it's not always as black and white as it seems.

Posted
Would you still feel the same if the person who smoked and needed a transplant or operation was a member of your family or someone you cared about?

I think I would, although I understand what you are saying. Not everything in life is easy or pleasant though, and the solution to people killing themselves and costing the NHS millions by smoking is not going to be achieved painlessly.

I've been on a transplant waiting list for two and a half years btw.

Posted
Not everything in life is easy or pleasant though...

Is anything? *sigh*

I've been on a transplant waiting list for two and a half years btw.

Which just goes to show, like I said, that not everything is as simple as it seems. Obviously your situation effects how you feel, and other people's past experiences effect how they feel. I don't know what the solution is, but I really do hope that everything works out for you soon.

Posted

It's not that black and white. Should we refuse to pay for health problems caused by obesity as well? Should we refuse to pay for people who break their legs skiing or skateboarding because it was self-inflicted? Should we refuse to treat people who were injured while fighting?

The NHS was set up in 1948 (or thereabouts) to treat everyone for free, and despite its failings, it sort of does that. I had an economics A level question on this last year: should the NHS charge smokers for their treatment. It's difficult to say what health problems are caused by smoking. Some non-smokers get lung cancer, so you can't label something as purely a smokers' problem.

There isn't really any easy answer to the smoking issue. I don't think you can really exclude anyone from the NHS, because it raises too many more issues. At the moment the high tax on cigarettes is supposedly compensating for the additional strain on the NHS but the NHS has huge problems as it is (a completely separate issue though).

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Posted
It's not that black and white. Should we refuse to pay for health problems caused by obesity as well? Should we refuse to pay for people who break their legs skiing or skateboarding because it was self-inflicted? Should we refuse to treat people who were injured while fighting?

The NHS was set up in 1948 (or thereabouts) to treat everyone for free, and despite its failings, it sort of does that. I had an economics A level question on this last year: should the NHS charge smokers for their treatment. It's difficult to say what health problems are caused by smoking. Some non-smokers get lung cancer, so you can't label something as purely a smokers' problem.

There isn't really any easy answer to the smoking issue. I don't think you can really exclude anyone from the NHS, because it raises too many more issues. At the moment the high tax on cigarettes is supposedly compensating for the additional strain on the NHS but the NHS has huge problems as it is (a completely separate issue though).

Totally true. I'm well aware that the measures I aspire to are not do-able in this country. But I do believe that it is possible and desirable to go some way towards the idea that those of us who do not deliberately make ourselves ill should not have to continually subsidise those who do. I'm not saying it wouldn't be complex, but I really think it needs to happen.

Also, Bexy (sorry, I still haven't worked out how to quote multiple posts in one reply....!), you're quite right in that my own situation has caused me to think on these subjects more than I might have otherwise, but thankfully neither my condition nor my treatment is affected by any of these issues, so thats a relief!

  • 8 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Wednesday, surely? But this is another mess, as this weeks Summer press release said it’ll be Sam & Danni no Jamie from the 28th - so it’s actually a whole week earlier!
    • Jamie Laing’s last show before his summer break will be on Thursday 16th July.
    • I worked out once Scott spent 3 months of a year off his own slot in the Moyles days and more like 4 in Grimmys days, six weeks of his own holiday and projects, six covering Grimmy plus some ad hoc days 
    • Back on topic, I think there's quite a few of the current Radio 1 presenters who would be able to adapt to Radio 2's style in the future. It's more of question of how many of them will actually end up there. With much of R2's line up changed over the past couple of years, it's quite possible we won't see much movement there, and R2 management might even decide to look elsewhere to bring in new presenters in future.
    • With OJ covering on bank holidays. She is the best person for the job however... they're going to end up with a situation like Scott covering R1 breakfast back in the day, where she spends quite a bit of time off her own slot covering Breakfast, plus her own holiday and other commitments. She's been filming for something recently which has meant she's been off several days a week since May. She was off last week, on breakfast this week, OJ is on Mon/Tues next week, then She's off the following two weeks.
    • Looking back at this I would say now that Sara is the main cover - I think she has been reestablished as it now 
    • Purley on the R1 Dance station.. Someone on DS said don't expect to see any changes to the schedule on the new stations however if they are taking on Capital Dance with this, which they clearly are, which has live presenters 7am - 10pm except for the 11am mix then they'll surely have to have a proper scheduled set of shows. At the moment Arielle is the only "live" per say show and only "live" a few days a week with earlier shows being repeated Thursday Friday and Saturday. Connor and Charlie are clearly pre records but was this only for the time it was online only and they have already got a schedule ready to go on day 1? also of note is that Charlie is taking over a podcast as well as starting a new project with podcasting which makes me wonder if she is about to step back from Dance Anthems all together to concentrate on those and Connor takes over? So you could have Arielle doing 9-12 weekdays live then someone else 12-3 and Connor live 3-6 on R1D and doing Dance Anthems on a Saturday. 
    • As none of the Going Home Team aren't currently on the air, that's a bit if an issue. Considering most of the Dance DJs will be out there, I'm surprised none of them are being utilised to host the 1-4 slot that weekend.
    • Going Home presenters have done the last few years ?
    • Nat and Vicky are being sent to Ibiza this year. They’ll be live on Friday 1st August from 1-4pm.     
    • Since Radio 1 Dance and Anthems have been allowed to broadcast on DAB, do we think they’ll be a proper schedule of shows like on Radio 1 Dance with the morning show and Dance Anthems at drive time. Maybe Lauren Redfern, Tyler Selby, Chrissy Cameron or Matt Hallsworth will be scheduled on named shows like Hits Radio 00s or Capital Anthems rather than the generic ‘Radio 1 Anthems’ show. Obviously it would probably cost more to produce actual shows on the station however.
    • There's been a lot of positive reaction to the Mylo and Rosie news so am interested now to hear what their shows are like. And yep wouldn't be surprised if they stay on beyond July as cover ever so often. And that Friday-Sunday news was hidden in the small print a little. It presumably means we lose Party Anthems all that month as that is what has happened this year with Big Weekend, Glasto for example. I certainly I hope it isn't Party Anthems being quietly axed full stop - it and Future Pop are 2 real hidden gems on Radio 1. 
    • I’m pleased for Mylo and Rosie, they were highly thought of in our local area and definitely worthy of that slot 
    • I’m thinking the same redding and Leeds etc 
    • -Considering how little Jamie has appeared since Vick went off on maternity, it probably would've been more sensible to have Sam & Danni taking over from that point and have him return with Katie. - Mylo and Rosie are apparently very good and one of the more popular local presenters who lost their slot when Hits went fully national. I gather they are very popular in Yorkshire. I can see them definitely see them popping up again beyond this stint. -Life Hacks cover is yet another good opportunity for some new voices (I know Yinka has popped up in the past). I have enjoyed Pete Allison covering though. I'm assuming most of August's Friday to Sunday 1-4pm will be made up of festival coverage.
×
×
  • Create New...