Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

why do people watch x-factor


E*F*4L

Recommended Posts

why do people watch x-factor ?

watching a bunch of people who cannot sing, getting picked by a couple of marketing (so called) experts,

these people are not talented in the slightest in any way shape or form, let alone singing ability, all they ever sing is cover's (badly),

if you people cared about music you would be out supporting the many talented musicians & singers who write & perform their own (original songs/music),

this reality crap has already destroyed music in the UK as well as the fabric of the nation with the likes of Big Brother & it's famous for famous sake, sitting about watching a bunch of people sitting about in a house, give me a brake,

what to you get out of it, surly it's not as entertaining as going & seeing a proper live (original) band/singer, if you like music so much ?

why do people watch it, i don't, i do not understand why people go crazy for it, Twitter goes into meltdown when it is on & you cannot moan about it otherwise the fanboys & fangirls get upset :rolleyes:

as soon as x-factor finishes, we have 'i'm a (fucking z-lister nobody desperate to get my feeble career back in the news/papers) celeb get me outa here' why not drop them on a island & have them only eat what they can catch & live for two months like Robinson Crusoe.

can anyone explain the appeal of it ?

ps, i know this may seem like one of my random rants, but i genuinely would like to know the reason, what people get out of it.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two words - Matt Cardle. :D

:rolleyes::P

(in a way I'm sorta glad you didn't say Wand Erection :P )

My Twitter feed is telling me everything I don't need to know about this show, it's not about the actual singing, that's for sure.

It bothers me that these people are allowed to pollute the charts at the end of it all though, I mean this show is basically the same as Matthew Kelly's Stars In Their Eyes, at least they admitted it was a look-and-soundalike karaoke competition though and never saw the need to extend it beyond TV.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In all seriousness though - anyone who really strongly dislikes X Factor would be well advised to YouTube Matt's performance from tonight's show. Whatever your opinions of the show itself and of the judges you cannot deny that that guy has talent. And it's people like him who make me want to watch the show.

So save the last dance

For me my love 'cause I

I see you as an angel freshly fallen from the sky...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

who or what is matt cardel? I've fortunately only had the misfortune of seeing the show this year twice, and both times were because I couldnt change it as it was a friends tv. The first time i watched it I spent the hour dribbling over Pixie Lott which made it bearable, and the second time we just sat tearing into how sh*t they were. No talent to hear of, and no talent to look at, possibly with the exception of half of that girl band thing.

Not impressed with censorship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Epic rant there Alan. So impressive, I won't even be so pedantic as to correct the numerous spelling/grammatical errors.

Unqualified as I am; I do Strictly as opposed to X Factor, I am aware of some of what's going on. I agree with Mr D Haxorz. The material is derivative nonsense. "Tonight Mathew, I'm going to be Cher"! If a singer came on with their own material, that might prick up my ears.

I'm also increasingly frustrated by X Factor contestants littering up the charts, when there is so much more 'talent' out there.

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Epic rant there Alan. So impressive, I won't even be so pedantic as to correct the numerous spelling/grammatical errors.

Unqualified as I am; I do Strictly as opposed to X Factor, I am aware of some of what's going on. I agree with Mr D Haxorz. The material is derivative nonsense. "Tonight Mathew, I'm going to be Cher"! If a singer came on with their own material, that might prick up my ears.

I'm also increasingly frustrated by X Factor contestants littering up the charts, when there is so much more 'talent' out there.

it's not meant as a rant, i know it comes across as one, but i really don't get it.

i didn't really watch 'stars in their eyes' but i think it is/was a better show mainly because the people could sing, maybe only one song, but they did it because they liked it, the people on the x-factor just want to become famous, it really is a simple as that, they are forgotten in a year when the next lot come along then two or three years later they are on i'm a celeb.

there is loads of talent out there (real talent) & they cannot get anywhere due to shit like this.

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do we watch most entertainment shows? Escapism, innit. I know I watch X Factor just because I've always watched talent shows Pop Idol to Popstars: The Rivals; Britain's Got Talent to X Factor. I guess it's just become part of my Saturday night life, plus I enjoy watching how crap Cher Lloyd is and enjoy the "fashion-offs" between Cheryl and Dannii.

Alouette...deployer les ailes;

Alouette...plumerai les ailes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best bloody programme on the telly (apart from Emmerdale and The Cut) seeing as Paris Hilton's My New Bff and Waterloo Road aren't currently on.

The appeal is it's an entertainment/reality programme. People like knowing every aspect of somebody's life (splashed out on the newspapers, then exploited on The X Factor). People love to hate people, and love to love them. Somebody else to put on the wall of their bedroom. Somebody else to badmouth.

Comedy. It can be funny. Especially at the auditions.

People also like to waste their time and money. You can vote continueously. I, personally, watch five hours of it a week. Two X Factors and then Xtra Factor (Saturday and Sunday). It's always on catch-up too.

People also like to argue. I do it reguarly. About who they like, don't like. Even judges. People's hair, etc.

People like music too. Celebrities perform on a Sunday, which is great. These people on the X Factor sing, and people will hear old music, new music, in a new style, which they may like, or may not.

Simon Cowell, Cheryl Cole, Dermot O'Leary (JACKSON!), etc. People's favourite celebrities, they want to see them on the telly.

So many people watch it, you're considered weird if you don't. People like fitting in with the crowd. That's the society we live in.

I could go on, but I'm trying to watch The Xtra Factor on catch-up.

OMASM. Radio presenters are like fruit. Matt is my kumquat and Scott is blatantly my orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best bloody programme on the telly (apart from Emmerdale and The Cut) seeing as Paris Hilton's My New Bff and Waterloo Road aren't currently on.

[and so on, and so on...].

I could go on, but I'm trying to watch The Xtra Factor on catch-up.

If this was anyone else, I'd expect they were being sarcastic... But you.. I know you're not. Oh dear God... :(

samozzy.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it's hilariously shit. The only thing better than good TV is bad TV, because bad TV can be laughed at and ridiculed. That's how I treat X-Factor. If you watch it knowing that it's just an OTT parody of itself, it's great fun. It's not serious, but it treats itself as such - the singers are flashes in the pan, the judges are hailed as demi-gods, Dermot is every generic overexcited do-gooder selling himself out for a quick few pennies, the lights and sound effects and production are The Day Today-level ridiculous, Konnie Huq is a hyperactive student presenter who just reels off words and hopes for the best, and the people who take it seriously as a TV show and get attached to the singers on a vicarious level are as sad as the fickle girl audience who fancy half the young males because it's easier to fancy a hot guy on TV than find a similar hot guy in person with their silly fat/ugly faces and general emotional desperation.

Put the whole package together and you have something beautiful to spend Saturday night laughing your ass off at. It's parody for the lowest common denominator at its finest, and it doesn't even know it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been wondering actually when the audience it does attract will get sick of it the same way they did with Stars In Their Eyes (which in my opinion was far more honest about what it was and a better show because of it... it's the same way they tried to spice up the new Gladiators by putting everything above a swimming pool, for me I prefer the 90s version and they way they had things)

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it's hilariously shit. The only thing better than good TV is bad TV, because bad TV can be laughed at and ridiculed. That's how I treat X-Factor. If you watch it knowing that it's just an OTT parody of itself, it's great fun. It's not serious, but it treats itself as such - the singers are flashes in the pan, the judges are hailed as demi-gods, Dermot is every generic overexcited do-gooder selling himself out for a quick few pennies, the lights and sound effects and production are The Day Today-level ridiculous, Konnie Huq is a hyperactive student presenter who just reels off words and hopes for the best, and the people who take it seriously as a TV show and get attached to the singers on a vicarious level are as sad as the fickle girl audience who fancy half the young males because it's easier to fancy a hot guy on TV than find a similar hot guy in person with their silly fat/ugly faces and general emotional desperation.

Put the whole package together and you have something beautiful to spend Saturday night laughing your ass off at. It's parody for the lowest common denominator at its finest, and it doesn't even know it.

best post of the week already, and it's 5am on a monday morning. the silly teenage girls part is spot on, especially the ones who are old enough to go and do something better with their time. honestly, do they really think this boyband who are in it this year are going to be the next beatles or something? what a joke.

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it's hilariously shit. The only thing better than good TV is bad TV, because bad TV can be laughed at and ridiculed. That's how I treat X-Factor. If you watch it knowing that it's just an OTT parody of itself, it's great fun. It's not serious, but it treats itself as such - the singers are flashes in the pan, the judges are hailed as demi-gods, Dermot is every generic overexcited do-gooder selling himself out for a quick few pennies, the lights and sound effects and production are The Day Today-level ridiculous, Konnie Huq is a hyperactive student presenter who just reels off words and hopes for the best, and the people who take it seriously as a TV show and get attached to the singers on a vicarious level are as sad as the fickle girl audience who fancy half the young males because it's easier to fancy a hot guy on TV than find a similar hot guy in person with their silly fat/ugly faces and general emotional desperation.

Put the whole package together and you have something beautiful to spend Saturday night laughing your ass off at. It's parody for the lowest common denominator at its finest, and it doesn't even know it.

I love this post so much. :hahaha:

Incidentally, if anyone actually cares, Cher Lloyd has apparently been warned by Cheryl Cole about her drinking!!

Go for it, I say, may make the performances a little less predictable!!

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this was anyone else, I'd expect they were being sarcastic... But you.. I know you're not. Oh dear God... :(

Oh damn, I forgot to mention The Only Way Is Essex, Glee, Hollyoaks, Holby City and the news. RIP Jedward: Let Loose and The Bill.

@annalie are you not also watching the F Factor online with Matt Edmonson?

I wish! Laptops scare me. I cry when I think other people will be looking at Matt Edmondson's face more than me. *crys*

OMASM. Radio presenters are like fruit. Matt is my kumquat and Scott is blatantly my orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • When Scott and Chris announced their departure from R1, I remember there was lots of speculation about who would take over the 1pm slot. Matt and Mollie were talked about a lot on here, and at the time I really didn't rate them as a replacement. A few years on, I see that I was totally wrong. They are such a good pairing, and it's the same kind of duo as Scott and Chris, in that they are real life friends, who spend time together in their real lives, which really does come across on air. True friends having a laugh together, and everyone is invited is how it feels to me now. I never thought about it before, but I agree with @coffeeandgin that Mollie is the Scott of the duo - pop obsessed and maybe a litte ditsy, but so funny, and in need of someone to anchor to or bounce off.  It seems that Matt is the kind of Chris of the duo then in that comparison, the one with the ideas, but also needs another person to make the magic happen. I know I'm outside of the R1 demographic, and maybe Dean and Vicky were meant to be younger and fresher, but I'm sure in my younger years I would have preferred to listen to two people who had a genuine connection and could really make each other laugh, as well as have the listeners laugh along. That was the Scott and Chris factor for me, and I think the only pair that come close to that now are Matt and Mollie.
    • Find Noah Kahan is just busker music. I mean I was pleasantly surprised that Ezra collective were in session for Jack Saunders on his new shoes and he is playing their latest track wouldn’t have thought few years back that at 6pm in the evening jazz music would be played. I hope if can get the green light and launch the 00s/10s station that the focus is on more new music be it pop mainstream and alternative genres on the main 1
    • Scott's show is perfect for the office. If Matt and Mol have a podcast I'd listen to that. All the fun without the Gen Z rappers. 
    • Similar to SZA’s Kill Bill, the word “kill” had been initially cut out of Taylor Swift’s Fortnight. But it seems like they are now playing an unedited version.
    • Also hopefully won't get my head bitten off for this but I'd say of the current Radio 1 DJs the one arguably most similar to Scott Mills's latter time on Radio 1 would be Mollie. I'm not saying she's as good as Scott was to be clear but she is that sort of vibe. 'Future Pop' is exactly the sort of music Scott would be championing and you can tell Mollie has the same passion for it that Scott did. There's that Party Anthems link too - a show Matt & Mol do that previously Scott did and they bring a similar energy to how Scott did that makes it a fun listen. Matt & Mollie seem to just have that natural connection with the listeners that Scott & Chris did that you can't manufacture.
    • I find at the minute I'm a bit of a nomad when it comes to radio stations. Often the Radio 1 playlist really doesn't appeal to me these days and I did wonder is it just me tiring of new music but then I'll listen to Future Pop and Party Anthems and there's loads of tunes on there that I love and they're excellent listens but just too few of those make it to the playlist. Radio 2 may arguably be more to my taste music wise but also often feels too rooted on the past. Plus much of the content just doesn't appeal to me and verges on the 'mumsy' side. Plus Radio 2's new music can feel very 'middle of the road' - just because I don't enjoy some of the Radio 1 new stuff it doesn't mean I want Take That & Will Young as 'new music'. For me currently if I'm tuning in for radio it'll be Jordan North on Capital Breakfast, on Radio 1 Matt & Mollie, (if Jamie is off)  Going Home and Sam & Danni plus there's also Capital Dance and Mistajam. They all hit the mark for me in a way other shows don't.
    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
×
×
  • Create New...