Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Recommended Posts

Posted
You don't pay for VI form but the school might ask for voluntary payments... my school is £25 a year, which goes towards publication of the annual school magazine, school trips funds for those who can't afford it, and some goes to the CCF.

What's so great about my school?

School magazine, school trip funds? You just proved it.

OMASM. Radio presenters are like fruit. Matt is my kumquat and Scott is blatantly my orange.

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
yeh, like you don't do exactly the same thing, or anything.

(rolls eyes)

*I have loads more fans anyhow * :-) Including an actual cop. Well pleased with this !! :-)

You just want to be in cuffs...

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Posted
School magazine, school trip funds? You just proved it.

Does everyone not have a school mag?

Currently ours is a big glossy yearly thing. That's been going for over 150 years.

Aaand we're working on a weekly/ monthly one for VI form students, named after our latin school song. #geeky.

etheridge_tom.png
Posted
Does everyone not have a school mag?

They started one this year, there's only ever been 1 edition. Its about four sheets of a4 stapled together.

Also, get you having a school song!

The sheep is not a creature of the air.

Posted
haha! Yep, our school song is 'mezzin.

Big up the chorus

Maidstonenses gaudeamus

Laudibus, et efferamus

Scholam nostram, quae oramus

Sempiterna floreat.

I have absolutly no idea what you just said there.

The sheep is not a creature of the air.

Posted
haha! Yep, our school song is 'mezzin.

Big up the chorus

Maidstonenses gaudeamus

Laudibus, et efferamus

Scholam nostram, quae oramus

Sempiterna floreat.

They will still be singing that when you start your career in jail. :hahaha:

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Posted

Is it just me, or does a school with a song just sound incredibly pretentious? Plenty of schools including the ones I went to never needed that, or a School magazine. #JustSayin

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Posted

It is a bit mental somehow!! I agree. I'm not surprised Etheridge attends a school like this though !! :hahaha:

Back on topic, I received an email from a company who had had 1000 job applications for the one position. Now, this is really scary.

O, and I attended an interview on Monday. Was ... er... early... and the interviewer was so rude about it. D'uh. You would think that shows keeness and enthusiasm, but no..... a major problem instead?!?!

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Posted

I've seen that program before in a previous series. Just seemed like some self-important self-described 'expert' telling people what she thinks they should do as if it were fact. Some of it was basic common sense. Glad I never encountered anyone like that while I was jobseeking, would have told them where to get off.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Posted

The way the programme is presented is bad. They always seem to take the worst of people with tattoos, crazy hair, single mothers who don't care, and pull them into it. Can't have any kind of "normal" person jobseeking of course. They all just have to be total bums.

The actual fairyjobmother seems somehow quite a nice lady, but the programme itself is patronising. The handing people lists and telling them they have to do so many jobs in a week, and she has a look at it all is so school-like. I mean, headmistress watching over bad pupils.

I got into a spat on twitter about it last night, with someone who was telling me every reason someone couldn't get a job was just all excuses. I was furious last night, and wound up up past my 10 o clock bedtime as well. *mad*

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Posted

Incidentally, I'd like to say I always do not agree with the concept that people HAVE to do any job because tax payers are paying the benefits. There are certain things that people would NOT be suited to. A care home has to be one of them. Surely these types of jobs are VOCATIONS, where you need to have exceptional patience with people !!

Also, I could never do customer service. I'd literally tell you where you could stick all your products. Couldn't work in TESCO either. If I got an obnoxious customer, I would just start throwing shopping ! !

It's just not every job people are suited to. I firmly believe Mr David Cameron needs to attend a Work Club, because he himself does not appear to know what he is doing.

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Posted

i'm finding it hard to find something that i can apply for, usually every employer wants someone with about 20 years experience. so for a 22 year old who's only done one thing more or less since he left school, it's hard to even get a look-in.

on the grid.

Posted
Incidentally, I'd like to say I always do not agree with the concept that people HAVE to do any job because tax payers are paying the benefits. There are certain things that people would NOT be suited to. A care home has to be one of them. Surely these types of jobs are VOCATIONS, where you need to have exceptional patience with people !!

I don't think that's the issue at hand, in fact it's quite the opposite. Working in a care home is something where the employee would have to be well-qualified for the job at hand - people aren't going to be forced into that job. Instead I think the issue is people with good academic qualifications and high expectations being asked to stack shelves at a supermarket for instance. They might feel that it's not the sort of job they should be expected to do, and to be honest I can sympathise with that. Tough one to judge.

Posted
people aren't going to be forced into that job. .

Bullshit. My neighbour who is with a training provider (that's code for complete dickhead) has just been asked if he would work in the care sector. That's because Care is one of the industries (like security) who have apparently coped well despite the recession.

My neighbour has a degree in a completely different area - of course, if he refuses to go down this path, it will be seen to be refusing opportunities, and sanctions will be made against his benefits.

Also, the Government are gonna pretty much stand back (apparently), and let these training places do what they like, and that's gonna leave a lot of long-term unemployed people in a v. vulnerable position to be completely taken advantage of.

Please feel free to google the Government's Welfare to Work programme, which I am predicting will end in complete chaos.

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Posted

No one is forcing him. As always you've made up your argument, and are sticking to it no matter what.

If he is qualified to do a job, and he refuses to do it, why not take sanctions against him?

and, 'in the care sector' could be management, admin, allocation of resources/ staff, HR trainers, etc.

etheridge_tom.png
Posted
No one is forcing him. As always you've made up your argument, and are sticking to it no matter what.

If he is qualified to do a job, and he refuses to do it, why not take sanctions against him?

and, 'in the care sector' could be management, admin, allocation of resources/ staff, HR trainers, etc.

Fair enough. It could be management, admin. - it just wasn't the way it was put to him.

And sticking to the argument, or not, I simply do not agree with sanctions. Life in these crazy job market times is hard enough without people making life even worse by cutting the amount you have to live on down.

O, and he's being told he's not applying for enough jobs full stop - even though he applies for 30 per month on average. I'd say that was pretty good going. As well as attending interviews.

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Posted
If he is qualified to do a job, and he refuses to do it, why not take sanctions against him?

.

What if you aren't qualified though, and someone insists you go down this path, purely for the purpose of filling vacancies, is that OK??

The reality of these Training Provider places which the long-term unemployed get sent to is they get money from the Government per position filled, so you get anybody booted into anything (fact).

Not argument. Actual FACT.

Edit: Yeh, brilliant, log off and run away, why don't you!!

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Posted
he's being told he's not applying for enough jobs full stop - even though he applies for 30 per month on average. I'd say that was pretty good going. As well as attending interviews.

This is also my experience, even though the jobcentre's own listed expectation was TWO-THREE or more jobs a FORTNIGHT when I was last jobseeking... I have actually seen chavvy scrotes go in and basically say "Yo blud, ting is me ain't applied for nuffin, gimme my dolla..." (which infuriates me when they DO still get their money...). Apparently the excuse is that they can't check everyone, so they check 'randomly' (i.e not randomly at all, but the ones they KNOW are doing everything asked of them, so they can cut down on paperwork they have to do when they DO 'catch' someone frauding)

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Posted

This whole job market thing is depressing.

My area is the hardest place fo 18-24 year olds to get jobs, and if I go to uni, I'll have a massive debt to pay off as well.

I hope Nick Clegg is just crying in a corner somewhere.

The sheep is not a creature of the air.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Dean McCullough in for Greg w/c 4th August. James Cusack on EB.
    • Well looks like Mollie is off all month now so presumably a personal matter. 
    • Intrigued why Matt & Mollie aren't presenting breakfast on Monday, with James in for them instead (which has happened before).. or even James given a chance to present the breakfast show?
    • Sam & Danni seem to be down for Breakfast on Monday. James Cusack on Going Home. That’s another new name in the list of “people who have hosted Going Home in 2025”.
    • Wednesday, surely? But this is another mess, as this weeks Summer press release said it’ll be Sam & Danni no Jamie from the 28th - so it’s actually a whole week earlier!
    • Jamie Laing’s last show before his summer break will be on Wednesday 16th July.
    • I worked out once Scott spent 3 months of a year off his own slot in the Moyles days and more like 4 in Grimmys days, six weeks of his own holiday and projects, six covering Grimmy plus some ad hoc days 
    • Back on topic, I think there's quite a few of the current Radio 1 presenters who would be able to adapt to Radio 2's style in the future. It's more of question of how many of them will actually end up there. With much of R2's line up changed over the past couple of years, it's quite possible we won't see much movement there, and R2 management might even decide to look elsewhere to bring in new presenters in future.
    • With OJ covering on bank holidays. She is the best person for the job however... they're going to end up with a situation like Scott covering R1 breakfast back in the day, where she spends quite a bit of time off her own slot covering Breakfast, plus her own holiday and other commitments. She's been filming for something recently which has meant she's been off several days a week since May. She was off last week, on breakfast this week, OJ is on Mon/Tues next week, then She's off the following two weeks.
    • Looking back at this I would say now that Sara is the main cover - I think she has been reestablished as it now 
    • Purley on the R1 Dance station.. Someone on DS said don't expect to see any changes to the schedule on the new stations however if they are taking on Capital Dance with this, which they clearly are, which has live presenters 7am - 10pm except for the 11am mix then they'll surely have to have a proper scheduled set of shows. At the moment Arielle is the only "live" per say show and only "live" a few days a week with earlier shows being repeated Thursday Friday and Saturday. Connor and Charlie are clearly pre records but was this only for the time it was online only and they have already got a schedule ready to go on day 1? also of note is that Charlie is taking over a podcast as well as starting a new project with podcasting which makes me wonder if she is about to step back from Dance Anthems all together to concentrate on those and Connor takes over? So you could have Arielle doing 9-12 weekdays live then someone else 12-3 and Connor live 3-6 on R1D and doing Dance Anthems on a Saturday. 
    • As none of the Going Home Team aren't currently on the air, that's a bit if an issue. Considering most of the Dance DJs will be out there, I'm surprised none of them are being utilised to host the 1-4 slot that weekend.
    • Going Home presenters have done the last few years ?
    • Nat and Vicky are being sent to Ibiza this year. They’ll be live on Friday 1st August from 1-4pm.     
    • Since Radio 1 Dance and Anthems have been allowed to broadcast on DAB, do we think they’ll be a proper schedule of shows like on Radio 1 Dance with the morning show and Dance Anthems at drive time. Maybe Lauren Redfern, Tyler Selby, Chrissy Cameron or Matt Hallsworth will be scheduled on named shows like Hits Radio 00s or Capital Anthems rather than the generic ‘Radio 1 Anthems’ show. Obviously it would probably cost more to produce actual shows on the station however.
×
×
  • Create New...