Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Help! Politics! :O


Guest PineapplesLikeAarons

Recommended Posts

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons

Can somebody please give me an ultra-quick ultra-short explaination on what The Conservatives, Labour and The Liberal Democrats all stand for?? I'm writing a speech for it for our class assembly on Tuesday, need it in by tomorrow and after last term I'm trying to be extra good and took on writing this thing. Can't get in trouble again! Please help!

Thanks(: x

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8515961.stm#subject=key&col1=conservative&col2=labour&col3=libdem

Those are their policies for this election.

In historical terms, Labour hold socialist values, the Lib Dems hold liberal values and the Conservatives have conservative values but they are increasingly similar to each other nowadays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons

Oh right.. Basically I need a line about the main 3 parties that a load of year eights will understand.

I've been given this info:

650 seats available in 2010. If one party wins at least 326, they have a MAJORITY, it is important to have a majority because it enables the government to make decisions on their own.

If no party wins a majority of seats then a HUNG PARLIAMENT will be formed, in this case no party has enough MPs to make decisions on their own so they need to team up.

AND (these are seperate things..)

Main Parties; Conservative, Labour, Lib Dem

Leaders; Mr Cameron, Mr Brown, Mr Clegg

Labour have been in power since 1997.

The Conservative party are likely to win the most votes,

Labour are likely to have the most seats

It's likely that no one will be able to form a government.

I have to put them into a 4 sentence speech each and find out a bit more info about them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wikipedia could be the answer to your problem.

To make things even easier:

The Conservative Party

The Labour Party

The Liberal Democrats

You can probably get some more information from those three sites (e.g brief history / what they stand for). That, combined with their key policies from the BBC site, should easily give you four lines each.

You could also write a bit about the smaller parties, The Green Party, UKIP etc. Although it's probably for the best that you don't mention the BNP! As far as I'm aware neither the Greens or UKIP hold a seat in the House of Commons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

650 seats available in 2010. If one party wins at least 326, they have a MAJORITY, it is important to have a majority because it enables the government to pass legislation through parliament with ease. In the last parliament, Labour had a large majority of 64 following the 2005 election- only time the Brown Administration was defeated in parliament was in June 2009 over the decision to great Gurkas citizenship.

If no party wins a majority of seats then a HUNG PARLIAMENT will be formed, in this case no party has enough MPs to make decisions on their own so they need to legislative support from other parties. The last time there was a Hung Parliament was between 1974 and 1979. Lib-Lab coalition. The 74-79 Labour government led by James Callaghan was seen by many as a disaster- the Conservatives were in power for 18 years after the 1979 Government fell in a "Motion of No Confidence".

AND (these are seperate things..)

Main Parties; Conservative, Labour, Lib Dem

Leaders; David Cameron, Gordon Brown, Nick Clegg

Labour came to power on the 1st May 1997 in a Landslide. They have grown increasingly unpopular in recent times over the recession, the expenses issue and Gordon Brown's perceived unpopularity.

The Conservative party are likely to win the most votes,

It's likely that no one will be able to form a majority government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons

Well thanks guys(:

I don't have to write it anymore.. I'm ill and taking the day off ): I didn't really revise for my science test later, so that is a plus...

My whole bus must think I'm a div, though.. I got on it and then pressed the stop button like a maniac and made the bus driver stop the bus because I was ill.. :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I don't feel there's so much overlap between M&M and Scott's shows. M&M is of a similar calibre to Scott & Chris on R1, with genuine laugh out loud moments and usually a show packed full of real interesting content. Scott's R2 show is IMO a shadow of the stuff he did on R1 (not his fault, he's doing exactly what station management want), with music and content to appeal to a much older audience.
    • To be fair, Scott & Chris would've still been fine on Radio 1. It was mentioned at the time that Scott's move was very much on Radio 2's part rather than Radio 1 wanting to move them on. That's the one problem that Radio 2 has, trying to appeal to such a wide demographic.. it's the perfect listen for many, but equally a turn off for many others. I think they have the balance fairly right.     
    • I agree Scott has always been a good standalone presenter, but always better when with someone. When chappers left the radio one show it felt a different show and Chris joining was what it needed and brought new life. for the format of the radio 2 show Scott’s show fits well with the station but again, there’s the huge gap between radio1 and 2 As been said already old radio2 listeners feel it now feels too young with latest changes, yet old radio1 listeners still feel radio 2 feels too old. The inbetween stage demographic of too old for radio 1 but too young for radio 2 is still not catered for radio 2 was left to grow old with its audience for too long and to change things up now feels to try and change a brand image the right thing to do is leave it as it is and cater for that 1.5 demographic which I’m sure the new proposed 00s and 10s station will do if approved. Problem is it’s so overdue that by the time it gets off the ground these listeners are already likely to be lost and the changing image of radio2 likely to lose what it stands for as a brand with the “it’s too young now “  moving to boom and the “ it still sounds old “ crowd not able to move with their favourite presenters like Scott so finding themself on capital a radio 1.5 would have been perfect for Scott and Chris, seems unlikely but this is why I think who branding of bbc radio needs a rethink if these new stations get off ground
    • Bank Holiday Monday Schedule 6am-10am: Arielle Free in for Greg 10am-2pm: Dean & Vicky (No Rickie, Melvin & Charlie) 2pm-6pm: Vick & Jamie (No Katie) 6pm onwards: As normal.
    • Dare I say they've sounded great this past week?  Very much gelling.  Maybe less pressure?  Seem to be having a genuinely good time and not forcing things.
    • I'm in the minority in my workplace, most of them love country music.  Me, the American, does not care for it.  That said, I haven't haaaaaated some of the country adjacent stuff that's been on the R1 playlist.  
    • The Eurovision semi finals are on from 8 to 10pm on Tuesday 7th and Thursday 9th May with Richie Anderson. That means Sara Cox in on till 8 on those days.  Saturday 11th May is Eurovision 'Super Saturday... 1-3pm Your Ultimate Abba song with Gary Davies  3-6pm Michelle Visage's Eurovision All Stars 6-8pm Eurovision Request Party with Owain Wynn Evans 8pm Eurovision Grand Final with Scott Mills and Rylan Clark  
    • It is funny because everyone thought Matt was on the way out, now he's been described as the heir to Mills.
    • Some similar names to Big Weekend.  Sabrina Carpenter, David Guetta, Perrie, Bradley Simpson, Jax Jones, Caity Baser, Benson Boone, Rudimental. David Guetta is a good name. 
    • Still Scott for me. I'm not too much into the 70s and 80s radio 2 play but do love the injection of 90s and 00s. Then Radio 2 push for all this country stuff and it not a UK thing, and I frankly don't like it. Scott's show as in features, hit and miss. I like the music police bit, but it feels like someone needs to join him. It's a shame Chappers is so busy with sports, as it feels like it could do with someone like him jumping on to help. Or a new partner. Radio 1, take or leave. Matt and Mollie are OK from what I've heard and share a good connection, but it's the playlist that throws me off. They could bring back Chris Moyles to do that show, but as soon as something like Headie One comes on with that casino keyboard produced crap. It would still be switched off from me. 
    • Reading through this thread, I don't feel quite so alone now, in thinking that Scott Mills on R2 is not a good 'fit' (even less so than on R5).  I can't quite explain why this is so - I just know it to be so.
    • Arielle has been on holiday for the last 2 weeks getting married / honeymoon.  It'll be live from this week onwards.
    • CassKidd is in for Sian on Sunday 5th May.
    • The brought to tiers feature was also very good from them. I did wonder which DJ's were going to get picked out of the hat, that could have gone one way or the other and the caller said they were very opinionated lol. Correct decision putting katie in god tier!
    • The extended Dua Lipa track from M&M was very funny. I'm hoping Matt and Mollie and Scott have a good relationship a bit like Greg and Zoe collaborate on-air sometimes.
×
×
  • Create New...