Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Russell Brand & Jonathan Ross


E*F*4L

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3mql03LvTk&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0xcc2550&color2=0xe87a9f"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3mql03LvTk&hl=en&fs=1&color1=0xcc2550&color2=0xe87a9f" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

i like the pic of Stalin in the back ground :D

such a shame, & a sincere apology from Russel, hopefully he will be back at the BBC sometime (like Chris Evans) maybe Russel & Jonathan could do a pod-cast together a couple of times a month :)

the BBC should have stood by them & i do hold the BBC responsible as they should have acted quicker, but it took place ten days ago & Paul Dacre (editor of the DM, Peirs Morgan & Max Clifford blew it out of all proportion (tossers who i hope die painfully) are the real ones to blame.

im sure Russell won't be down for long, maybe he could be Jonathan Ross's first guest on his new channel 4 show ;)

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

only he knows, but he has never been afraid to admit his mistakes.

& i feel that he didn't have much choice & he may have been the one to get the sack so quiting makes him seem to be a bit more honorable & gives him more options & he would have been advised on the best thing to do.

it's just that now the pair seem to have more support swinging their way, but it seems that the younger people don't really get much of a say (not that im that young) the BBC needs to have presenters to attract younger listeners & viewers so ultimately the BBC cannot win, but i thought the BBC did the Radio-1 listeners proud by saying to counter all the complaints that the listeners of Radio-1 were backing Brand & Ross.

maybe next time we can succeed :)

united we stand, divided we fall, after all this is a war angrysmilymob.gif

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm currently listening to 5 Live and they're making some good points about this, how the Mail picked up on it, how the press like to build up a hate figure, and how it shouldn't be top news ahead of the more important stories etc. They went through all of the front pages of tomorrow's newspapers and all of them were about the phone call!

It's beyond me how it's come to this...

kyliewilson.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The most powerful main in the world will be elected in 6 days- and THIS IS FRONT PAGE?

THIS RIGHT WING MEDIA DRIVEN BBC-BASHING DAILY MAIL DRIVEN FARCE?

WHAT ABOUT THE 16-25 DEMOGRAPHIC???? WHAT ABOUT US????

The BBC shouldnt have accepted this resignation. Brand was a fantastic entertainer. I hate the way the media go out to destroy these people. Why do the BBC stoop down to these cretins??? I will stab in the eye with a pencil anyone who I see reading a Daily Mail tomorrow. This got 2 COMPLAINTS when it was broadcast 10 days ago. Its the media that has made people complain- people who probaly havent listened in context. Aaaagh, I despise Post Hutton BBC. Have some balls.

As for Russell, I think it was clear he would be leaving soonish anyway. Matt had already left the show 6 weeks ago in strange circumstances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Daily Fail is now having a go at Mock The Week for making fun of the Queen...

Whatever happened to freedom of speech? It was just a joke! They make fun of her every week so why point this out now?! HAVE A SENSE OF ******* HUMOUR!!! :x

They were talking about that on Newsnight last night. Talk about making the situation worse for yourself, the BBC are feeding the papers fire more and more as they pick up on other incidences like that MTW one. George Alagiah and Emily Maitlis both grilled Mark Thompson as if they were beeb haters. STICK UP FOR YOUR OWN COMPANY!!

The the good thing to come out of this is thats Speed is being aired tonight rather than Friday night with Jonathan Ross!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion on the whole thing, a shambles that should never have happened. And I blame the programmes' producer and the controller of Radio 2 more than anyone.

They should have realised that they were working with two of the biggest most contreversial characters in the buissness, therefore with the programme not going out live, their should have been a strict editing process. There wasn't, it slipped through the net, which shouldn't have happened.

As for Russel, as much as I love him, he had to go. Its his show, he should have been more responsible. It's a real shame as it was a great show, and I believe he is a nice bloke who needs respecting for his decsision. His career will recover.

As for Ross, he should have had the sense to know he was taking it too far. He didn't and the 12 week suspension is an appropriate punishment. Young people may not see the problem in it, but it has offended the "Radio 2 listner" Good decsision Mark Thompson (BBC Director General). His show though may take a little time to recover, as some celeb's, particualrly older ones will not see him in the same light any more.

ChrisHewgill.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the fact this group almost has nearly the same amount of supporters as those who complained about the programme.

http://www.facebook.com/home.php?ref=logo#/group.php?gid=42215213905

Another week and still the newspapers are going on about it. I notice Georgina is still grabbing as much money as she can from the tabloids. Even Parky thinks he needs to have a say on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How immature to describe Michael Parkinson as "a tosser". Whilst I'd agree his interviewing technique went downhill slightly of late, he obviously realised this and subsequently retired. At your age (despite evidence to the contrary, I'm assuming you're over 20, possibly in your 30s), I'd expect you to recall his golden days, when he delivered quality interviews on a weekly basis, and show him a little more respect! Jeez! You'll be telling us you've had his grand daughter next...

On the subject of R&J this is worth a read : http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/nov/03/jonathan-ross-russell-brand

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Parky's no tosser, you'll make no friends stooping to that level. I however did fin it amusing that someone with a book out has appeared in the spotlight again to make a few comments about the saga.

It entertained me - I'd just popped on to post the link actually.

Try this one too: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5058096.ece

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • When Scott and Chris announced their departure from R1, I remember there was lots of speculation about who would take over the 1pm slot. Matt and Mollie were talked about a lot on here, and at the time I really didn't rate them as a replacement. A few years on, I see that I was totally wrong. They are such a good pairing, and it's the same kind of duo as Scott and Chris, in that they are real life friends, who spend time together in their real lives, which really does come across on air. True friends having a laugh together, and everyone is invited is how it feels to me now. I never thought about it before, but I agree with @coffeeandgin that Mollie is the Scott of the duo - pop obsessed and maybe a litte ditsy, but so funny, and in need of someone to anchor to or bounce off.  It seems that Matt is the kind of Chris of the duo then in that comparison, the one with the ideas, but also needs another person to make the magic happen. I know I'm outside of the R1 demographic, and maybe Dean and Vicky were meant to be younger and fresher, but I'm sure in my younger years I would have preferred to listen to two people who had a genuine connection and could really make each other laugh, as well as have the listeners laugh along. That was the Scott and Chris factor for me, and I think the only pair that come close to that now are Matt and Mollie.
    • Find Noah Kahan is just busker music. I mean I was pleasantly surprised that Ezra collective were in session for Jack Saunders on his new shoes and he is playing their latest track wouldn’t have thought few years back that at 6pm in the evening jazz music would be played. I hope if can get the green light and launch the 00s/10s station that the focus is on more new music be it pop mainstream and alternative genres on the main 1
    • Scott's show is perfect for the office. If Matt and Mol have a podcast I'd listen to that. All the fun without the Gen Z rappers. 
    • Similar to SZA’s Kill Bill, the word “kill” had been initially cut out of Taylor Swift’s Fortnight. But it seems like they are now playing an unedited version.
    • Also hopefully won't get my head bitten off for this but I'd say of the current Radio 1 DJs the one arguably most similar to Scott Mills's latter time on Radio 1 would be Mollie. I'm not saying she's as good as Scott was to be clear but she is that sort of vibe. 'Future Pop' is exactly the sort of music Scott would be championing and you can tell Mollie has the same passion for it that Scott did. There's that Party Anthems link too - a show Matt & Mol do that previously Scott did and they bring a similar energy to how Scott did that makes it a fun listen. Matt & Mollie seem to just have that natural connection with the listeners that Scott & Chris did that you can't manufacture.
    • I find at the minute I'm a bit of a nomad when it comes to radio stations. Often the Radio 1 playlist really doesn't appeal to me these days and I did wonder is it just me tiring of new music but then I'll listen to Future Pop and Party Anthems and there's loads of tunes on there that I love and they're excellent listens but just too few of those make it to the playlist. Radio 2 may arguably be more to my taste music wise but also often feels too rooted on the past. Plus much of the content just doesn't appeal to me and verges on the 'mumsy' side. Plus Radio 2's new music can feel very 'middle of the road' - just because I don't enjoy some of the Radio 1 new stuff it doesn't mean I want Take That & Will Young as 'new music'. For me currently if I'm tuning in for radio it'll be Jordan North on Capital Breakfast, on Radio 1 Matt & Mollie, (if Jamie is off)  Going Home and Sam & Danni plus there's also Capital Dance and Mistajam. They all hit the mark for me in a way other shows don't.
    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
×
×
  • Create New...