Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

do nice guys finish last?

DC

By DC
in The Lounge

 Share

do nice guys finish last?  

21 members have voted

  1. 1. do nice guys finish last?

    • yes we are screwed for life unless we change our ways and start being retards.
      5
    • at some point things level out and get easier.
      14
    • it's just the area dc is in and he needs to move away.
      1
    • what's a girl?
      1

Recommended Posts

DC

DC

Posted
Posted

taken from the blog, but i thought it deserved it's own thread.

so do we? the girls around here at least love the 'bad boy' type. how extreme that term may be varies from silly person to a complete pleb. the fact is, it seems being the nice, honest, genuine, respectful guy dosent cut it. at least not in my situation around here anyway. looks aside. is it just bad luck, the girls i target, the area i am in or what?

you have to be either completley p*ssed out of your head, want a fight, be very forcefull and start grabbing her arse before you know her name or all of them together plus more to get anywhere. is it the case that they seem low in the head? some girls first impressions seem good but you get lead back to square one somehow, 'oh i've been texting a few' etc... do they seek a challenge of trying to make someone better out of a complete knob? are they scared of being alone so they have someone who they think will protect them? does this all settle out as soon as we reach somewhere in our 20's?

thoughts.

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jono

Jono

Posted
Posted

I can't work out if Sinister is supposed to be making a dirty joke there or not.

I'd agree with the thread title. I've met many girls recently, and I know I'm not the best looking but yet to understand why they only want to be friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lucinda

Lucinda

Posted
Posted

I have male friends who've been through this, but the good news is, they all get girlfriends in the end. Women like someone who they think will be able to protect them to an extent, so a bit macho. I think they will come round to realise that the 'bad guys' are a waste of their time and they will only get hurt, but it seems like girls need to get hurt a certain number of times, a lot in some cases, before they learn that.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites
sinister

sinister

Posted
Posted
I have male friends who've been through this, but the good news is, they all get girlfriends in the end. Women like someone who they think will be able to protect them to an extent, so a bit macho. I think they will come round to realise that the 'bad guys' are a waste of their time and they will only get hurt, but it seems like girls need to get hurt a certain number of times, a lot in some cases, before they learn that.

I saw a docu about this a long time ago. The gist of it was what Lucinda has said. The blokes who you see flitting from girl to girl are ok for the short term, but girls usually go for the 'nice' blokes to settle down with because they're perceived as safer for family commitment. Does that make any sense?

'The light at the end of the tunnel was the light of an oncoming train'

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DC

DC

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I saw a docu about this a long time ago. The gist of it was what Lucinda has said. The blokes who you see flitting from girl to girl are ok for the short term, but girls usually go for the 'nice' blokes to settle down with because they're perceived as safer for family commitment. Does that make any sense?

girls never make any sense it seems. but if that is their ultimate aim, why cant they see the type their older relatives or friends are with? why always go the difficult way to get there?

'there's a nice guy robbing a pensioner who you could go with!'

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tamba

tamba

Posted
Posted
girls never make any sense it seems. but if that is their ultimate aim, why cant they see the type their older relatives or friends are with? why always go the difficult way to get there?

'there's a nice guy robbing a pensioner who you could go with!'

OY.... I'd go with the pensioner, as he would not have long to live and I could have his money :D x x

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Actually I do own the road

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riz

Riz

Posted
Posted

Just because this girl is all over a 'bad boy' in a nightclub, doesnt mean she wants a long term relationship.

In the short term, girls are more likely to go for the guy who approaches her and flirts with her, not the guy who stares at her from a distance hoping she'll make the first move.

What im trying to say is, this girl might not be all over you, but its not to say shes not interested in you. Then again, it might not be you at all, she might not want a relationship with anyone and is just looking for some 'fun'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lucinda

Lucinda

Posted
Posted

I think 'bad boys' appear to be more interesting. I have to admit I do know what kind of person is good for me, but I do get bored after a while and want excitement when I'm with someone who is 'nice' and considerate.

Most people don't settle down with someone till they're older these days, I think it's best not to look for very long term commitment as a teenager, but some people do. Don't give up hope, anyway, there are other ways of getting a girl than showing off how chavvy you are.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DC

DC

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just because this girl is all over a 'bad boy' in a nightclub, doesnt mean she wants a long term relationship.

In the short term, girls are more likely to go for the guy who approaches her and flirts with her, not the guy who stares at her from a distance hoping she'll make the first move.

What im trying to say is, this girl might not be all over you, but its not to say shes not interested in you. Then again, it might not be you at all, she might not want a relationship with anyone and is just looking for some 'fun'.

it is not anyone in particular it is just the general outlook around here i am on about.

as for me i wouldn't want anything madly serious, but i wouldn't mind being with someone. just with half a brain thats all.

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riz

Riz

Posted
Posted
it is not anyone in particular it is just the general outlook around here i am on about.

as for me i wouldn't want anything madly serious, but i wouldn't mind being with someone. just with half a brain thats all.

DC, DC, DC...

Maybe you should take a leaf from all the other guys' book then ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chaos

Chaos

Posted
Posted

I think that girls do tend to favor the 'bad boy'. I think we 'nice' guys ought to do something about it!!! Well, right after I finish baking my cookies....:lol:

Actually, I do bake. I like cooking, its fun, especially when you can really dig your fingers in, like the dough of pastry :) I'm actually going to be taking over the cooking at my nan's house, she's getting an op on her knee so she'll be off her legs for a while 8)

The most heroic act is the one that no-one knows about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DC

DC

Posted
  • Author
Posted

well majority rules so far, things will level out and get easier or so it seems. i think i need to put more effort in myself though, i dont know why but latley i lack a lot of confidence compared to what i used to be like. whats causing it i dont really know, but if i can get that back going i may be away again. i need to go to new places i think.

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andy B

Andy B

Posted
Posted

Guys who act like *******s are are generally more confident and there is nothing more atractive in a prospective partner than confidence which is why they end up pulling more.

I know it works I used to be nice when I went out and it got me no-where, act like a ******* and the girls love you for it (well the ones who put out after two bacardi breezers anyway).

If you wanna have a relationship with someone you meet you can't sleep with them on the first night so you have to act liek yourself. If on the other hand your just looking for a good time, act full of bravado and it'll get you what you want for a night. If you don't then you have real problems.

All of the above is observed from real life experiences although the names have been changed to protect the guilty.

Sometimes here, sometimes not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • NathanS
      Radio 2 Schedule Changes

      By NathanS · Posted

      I must have missed that yesterday, sorry! Scott did make the same tongue in cheek comment on today's show about Rylan. It's a shame Rylan isn't the go to cover for Scott, I assume his commitments away from R2 prevent that. I enjoyed his last cover stint. Spoony is the go to stand in for the mid afternoon slot (he's covering while Scott's off getting married).   In that case, I think you're right! 
    • UnofficialStark
      Radio 2 Schedule Changes

      By UnofficialStark · Posted

      Not that last minute. Scott was talking about it on his own show yesterday, saying he and Rylan have a deal where they cover each other's shows but Rylan only covers Scott when he can be bothered!
    • Bluestraw
      Radio 2 Schedule Changes

      By Bluestraw · Posted

      Sorry I should have been clearer, I meant daytime weekday. Weekend shows would count as a 'step up' from overnights for OJ.
    • NathanS
      Radio 2 Schedule Changes

      By NathanS · Posted

      If we're counting the overnight slot, OJ Borg regularly covers weekend shows.
    • Bluestraw
      Radio 2 Schedule Changes

      By Bluestraw · Posted

      The only weekday R2 DJ who would ever cover a weekend slot?!
    • NathanS
      Radio 2 Schedule Changes

      By NathanS · Posted

      What I assume is a very last minute change... Scott Mills is in for Rylan today.
    • TMD_24
      Radio 1 Schedule Changes

      By TMD_24 · Posted

      Radio 1 at Parklife will be presented by Vicky and Nat. Nat is currently listed to present her usual Sunday show on that weekend but I imagine that will change and someone else will be doing it instead. The Radio 1 presenters at Download will be Daniel P Carter, Jack Saunders, Alyx Holcombe and Nels Hylton.
    • TMD_24
      Radio 1 Schedule Changes

      By TMD_24 · Posted

      Nat in for Dean with Vicky as well that day.
    • Jono
      Matt and Mollie to replace Dean and Vicky

      By Jono · Posted

      So the end of weekend afternoons this week - new show is July 1st.
    • Lily Georgia
      Radio 1 Schedule Changes

      By Lily Georgia · Posted

      Arielle is in for Greg on Monday 27th May.
    • R1Fan1
      Going Home with Vick, Katie and Jamie

      By R1Fan1 · Posted

      He’s definitely gotten better and the show has sounded fine this week. I think it been at its best when it’s been Katie and Jamie or Vick and Katie. Vick and Jamie are ok together, but I do think the show sounds better when it’s Vick and Katie and therefore I still don’t really understand the point of the trio.    Jamie is, however, a lot better than Danny Beard! 
    • BBCAaron
      Next Radio 1 boss

      By BBCAaron · Posted

      The RAJAR coming on later this year reflecting later summer to autumn will be interesting to how it reflects Matt and Mollie in afternoons to the revised changes on radio 1’s new music slots and the schedule re-shuffling Radio 3 introducing a new slate of programmes. Then, later on this year have speech radio stations having domestic political coverage of the election but also America’s presidential election.  
    • xxladybarefootxx
      Going Home with Vick, Katie and Jamie

      By xxladybarefootxx · Posted

      I actually caught snippets of today’s show, and I found it much better than the last time I listened. I have made it no secret that I like Jamie on the radio, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed Matt & him together last year. People have criticised him for not being relatable, but I have to agree with the comment above that I have always found him a naturally warm person to listen to. Maybe the going home set up was something that needed settling in and things are starting to take shape.  It must have been difficult for him joining an established duo in Vick & Katie to begin with.  Jamie was great on something songs today, fully engaged in the caller and sounded like a real presenter. Maybe he is doing as a lot of us hoped and really learning as he goes, how to do it properly. 
    • Bluestraw
      Going Home with Vick, Katie and Jamie

      By Bluestraw · Posted

      Agree with this. The anti-Jamie feeling was IMO quite influenced by the negativity around him replacing Jordan, since Jordan was exceptional and also universally loved. When people mention Danny and Jamie in the same sentence about bad hiring decisions I almost choke - Jamie may not be perfect but he's several leagues better than Danny already and has bags of potential. Danny is poor and has shown zero potential...
    • R1 Insider
      Next Radio 1 boss

      By R1 Insider · Posted

      Jamie started 4 March, and the figures only going up to 31 March, so it isn't reliable. But it has shown the numbers have dropped in afternoons compared to last quarter. It looks like it's Capital's gain.
×
×
  • Create New...