Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Recommended Posts

Posted

A woman is facing charges of 'careless and inconsiderate driving' after deliberately driving through a puddle at high speed to soak a group of people waiting at a bus stop. The charge carries a fine of up to £2,500.

Police began to investigate after they received complaints about a clip of the incident, which was posted on YouTube.

<object width="320" height="265"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eSSXL_6DLc&hl=en&fs=1&hd=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eSSXL_6DLc&hl=en&fs=1&hd=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></embed></object>

The clip, taken from inside the Kerry Callard's vehicle, is accompanied by her male passenger's commentary as the car travels along down Weston Hill in Plymouth.

"Here we go, ready to drench the kids..." the passenger begins.

"Puddle at the bottom of the hill coming up, kids at the bottom of the hill – come on!" he continues excitedly, as the car drives through the puddle, soaking the bystanders.

"That was brilliant! Awesome!" he shouts, laughing.

Police said 29-year-old Callard had contacted them voluntarily about the incident last Thursday and the evidence was now being reviewed.

"We had three complaints from members of the public and as a result a 29-year-old woman was interviewed. The file has gone to the CPS for consideration," said a spokesman for Devon and Cornwall Police today.

"Although driving through standing water may be seen as a bit of fun, potentially it is very dangerous. Not only is it showing no consideration to the pedestrians who may get a soaking, but it could result in the driver losing control of the vehicle due to the force of the water snatching the wheel from the hands, or by the vehicle aquaplaning," the spokesman added.

Callard has claimed the children asked to be splashed and would not have done it otherwise.

"The fun factor is mostly gone from life these days but they were playing in puddles, like kids always have done. If the kids weren't saying 'Splash me, splash me', I certainly wouldn't have done it. I'm not a serial splasher," she told the Daily Mail.

Local police said the children's agreement would make no difference to how the standard of driving was judged.

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/article.html?YouTube_happy_splashing_video_driver_charged&in_article_id=752210&in_page_id=34

Well I never thought you could be fined for this sort of thing. Does the element of YouTube make it any different to day to day life though?

Posted

They have a point about how she was driving though. Speeding up to go through what was clearly relatively deep standing water (seen by the other car going through it ahead) could easily have seen her lose control of the car at speed, even killing anyone involved in the process.

A low speed alternative I'd see the funny side to, but not this. There's reckless/dangerous 'fun' and there's 'fun' with a bit of common sense...

Posted

it has always been against the law to do it, its a form of assault.

"the kids asked us to do it" yeah right.

the car could have easily veered into the kid's, when the water catches the wheels of the car (any driver will know the feeling if they have driven through a deep puddle, how the car sort of tramlines) or even hit something under the water & veered into the people standing there & most likely of killed them or seriously injured them.

the parents should take legal action & sue the pair, the driver at least & make them pay not the insurance company, hopefully they get banned from driving, a few weeks in jail also.

this type of thing REALLY pisses me off :x

they should be taught a lesson & see how they like it !

maybe the CIA could use some of their waterboarding techniques on them !

:)

Posted

... and breathe Alan.

I agree with some of the above though. Petrified myself by aquaplaning on the motorway in Madrid once. It is very dangerous.

Also, although I'm all for the odd water fight, I don't find splashing people with water in the street to be particularly amusing. Maybe Im losing my sense of humour?

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Posted

yes it does come across as a bit of a rant,

but if it wasn't for idiots like that there wouldn't be so many accidents nor health & safety (gone crazy) on the roads, wonder what other things they have got up to on the road, yes im not saying im the worlds best driver, but i do not drive like a nob.

that pair are just like the c (word)'s who drive across level crossings when a train is coming !

the video has been removed (in Jono's post), so here it is

<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwwjQm45YMw&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwwjQm45YMw&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>

:)

Posted

that pair are just like the c (word)'s who drive across level crossings when a train is coming !

Without risking a rant from me on this subject, and taking it totally off topic...

That indeed is unacceptable. However where I live, network rail keep the train gates down for 37 minutes in every hour (they probably only need to be down for 20 minutes. Usually they go down for trains that are 7 minutes away from the crossing). I can only assume this is similar everywhere else because when questioned, they responded it was for their passengers safety and to ensure no delays.

I heard somewhere, believe it was newsbeat, that despite all the latest safety campaigning, deaths at railway crossings have actually increased. The length of time the gates remain down per hour has most likely increased over the years, and therefore it seems possible that people are aware of this and rather than wait 3 times longer than they should, they risk their lives and potentially everyone on the train.

Back to the happy splashing... I do hope she gets that fine... the size of that puddle linked in with how fast they were going, looks like it could have really hurt those poor kids and is totally uncalled for. If puddles are safely unavoidable, I will drive around. If there is no chance I can pass (oncoming traffic) I will go through, if safely possible, at a reduced speed. If someone happens to be walking past a puddle at the same time im going to drive past and I cant safely reduce my speed or avoid... sorry but there isn't anything you can do!

Posted

Yeah I soaked someone the other day by driving through a puddle, I was on course to avoid it but when a dickhead driver cuts you up, well it was either the puddle or crash.

I am Burdened with Glorious Purpose - Loki Laufeyson

Posted
People who stand next to large puddles of water are bound to get soaked. Just don't stand there!

I dont stand next to puddles, and also i run when im walking up to a big puddle. I dont fancy getting soaked for no reason! :P

I Juggle. And i hang around the lounge mostly.

www.twitter.com/juggler

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

not so happy splashing :hahaha:

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-45s1zScPUY&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-45s1zScPUY&hl=en_US&fs=1&color1=0x006699&color2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

:)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Tara Kumar is in for Alyx on Sunday 13th July.
    • Conor Knight & Lauren Layfield are in for Matt & Mollie on Monday 14th July.  Matt is solo on Tuesday 15th July.  Jerry is in for Mollie between Wednesday 16th & Thursday 24th July.  Maia Beth is covering Future Pop on Wednesday 16th & Wednesday 23rd July. On Sunday 27th July the Chillest Show is reduced to an hour, and 20.00-21.00 is a BBC Proms special with JADE. On Thursday 31st July 18.00-20.00 in place of Jack's show it's the Dance Party Warm-Up with Danny Howard (ahead of the Ibiza weekend).
    • Dean McCullough in for Greg w/c 4th August. James Cusack on EB.
    • Well looks like Mollie is off all month now so presumably a personal matter. 
    • Intrigued why Matt & Mollie aren't presenting breakfast on Monday, with James in for them instead (which has happened before).. or even James given a chance to present the breakfast show?
    • Sam & Danni seem to be down for Breakfast on Monday. James Cusack on Going Home. That’s another new name in the list of “people who have hosted Going Home in 2025”.
    • Wednesday, surely? But this is another mess, as this weeks Summer press release said it’ll be Sam & Danni no Jamie from the 28th - so it’s actually a whole week earlier!
    • Jamie Laing’s last show before his summer break will be on Wednesday 16th July.
    • I worked out once Scott spent 3 months of a year off his own slot in the Moyles days and more like 4 in Grimmys days, six weeks of his own holiday and projects, six covering Grimmy plus some ad hoc days 
    • Back on topic, I think there's quite a few of the current Radio 1 presenters who would be able to adapt to Radio 2's style in the future. It's more of question of how many of them will actually end up there. With much of R2's line up changed over the past couple of years, it's quite possible we won't see much movement there, and R2 management might even decide to look elsewhere to bring in new presenters in future.
    • With OJ covering on bank holidays. She is the best person for the job however... they're going to end up with a situation like Scott covering R1 breakfast back in the day, where she spends quite a bit of time off her own slot covering Breakfast, plus her own holiday and other commitments. She's been filming for something recently which has meant she's been off several days a week since May. She was off last week, on breakfast this week, OJ is on Mon/Tues next week, then She's off the following two weeks.
    • Looking back at this I would say now that Sara is the main cover - I think she has been reestablished as it now 
    • Purley on the R1 Dance station.. Someone on DS said don't expect to see any changes to the schedule on the new stations however if they are taking on Capital Dance with this, which they clearly are, which has live presenters 7am - 10pm except for the 11am mix then they'll surely have to have a proper scheduled set of shows. At the moment Arielle is the only "live" per say show and only "live" a few days a week with earlier shows being repeated Thursday Friday and Saturday. Connor and Charlie are clearly pre records but was this only for the time it was online only and they have already got a schedule ready to go on day 1? also of note is that Charlie is taking over a podcast as well as starting a new project with podcasting which makes me wonder if she is about to step back from Dance Anthems all together to concentrate on those and Connor takes over? So you could have Arielle doing 9-12 weekdays live then someone else 12-3 and Connor live 3-6 on R1D and doing Dance Anthems on a Saturday. 
    • As none of the Going Home Team aren't currently on the air, that's a bit if an issue. Considering most of the Dance DJs will be out there, I'm surprised none of them are being utilised to host the 1-4 slot that weekend.
    • Going Home presenters have done the last few years ?
×
×
  • Create New...