Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Internet service providers


Lucinda

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I need some help here.

On Thursday I am going to my house in Nottingham for the first time. At the moment I think there is no Internet, no telephone and no TV. The previous people had NTL (so now it would be Virgin Media) but I think they have taken the telephone, TV and router with them.

Everyone I know who has dabbled in nTL/Virgin Media has had a nightmare time with them. We're not worried about TV because we will use Freeview but we need Internet that is fast and can be installed quickly with no download limit as there will be 5 of us using it a lot. I have a wireless router that we can use so we don't need to get one of them. Not hugely worried about getting a telephone.

Does anyone know a good ISP, with or without telephone included? My mum and my sister have had no problems with Tiscali, but the reviews I've read online and reports from other people say their customer service is awful. AOL seems to cap people's speeds at peak times which isn't good when 5 of us will be trying to use it. Virgin Media will probably take all year to set things up which is useless. I'd appreciate any help people can give me on this.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you say it needs to fast because five of you will be using it a lot... is this because you're using wireless and multiple computers, or just one computer? If it's wireless you'll obviously want a good speedy connection and want to look for an ISP with a free router (if possible!)

I use AOL which is quite handy as everyone gets a free screename, but you get the clunky software with it. You can get away without it with a router, depends whether that's the set-up you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've got a good wireless router. We will be using it each with a laptop wireless, so we will need quite high speed so we don't slow each other down.

Having the router makes it a bit easier as we don't have to rely on whoever will give us a 'free' router, as you generally end up paying for it somehow like through a long contract or higher costs.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only just seen this - just back from a short trip away...

There are normally two different types of wireless router - those that are simply that, or those that have an inbuilt ADSL/DSL modem... If you've got the former and your area is setup for 'cable TV', I'd suggest looking further into the NTL/Virgin Media offerings - they'll provide a cable-modem that you plug into the internet port of your router (you'll need to connect a PC directly to the router with an ethernet cable to configure it - so make sure one of your laptops has an onboard ethernet adapter - many do) and hey presto you're on. If the latter, any of the general ADSL/DSL providers would probably do.

To be honest, the customer service from pretty much all the possible providers can be poor. Though you might be one of the lucky ones like me that doesn't have any problems..!

I've been with NTL/Virgin now for years and haven't had any issues with their internet service (their TV service, NOT so great at times). There are different packages available, and nothing I've been on up to now had a download limit (bolinbenny - you might want to check if there's a 'free' upgrade to a recent contract to remove your current download limits - unless of course you're pirating several movies a day! ;)).

I was originally on the 8mb/s contract but have now switched to their 20mb/s offering, which actually is around that quick in my experience. But then, remember I'm currently in Leeds, and might not have that many others online around me! ;)

The contention rate with cable (i.e. the actual bandwidth you'll experience with your contract through the shared wiring - be aware the speed quoted is a 'maximum' not what you'll usually get all the time) is generally better, and with ADSL it also matters how far you are physically from the local exchange as to the quality/speed of your real connection...

I'd suggest trying Virgin Media at first - allowing plenty of notice for the install. Then, if you have problems try one of the others mentioned here...

My installation happened 3 days after I booked it, and has worked fine since. Though I *could* be one of the lucky ones in this...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

virgin media haven't been around for 7 years. you must of been using the old ntl or telewest service like me. i had no problem with telewest at all

I've been with telewest/Virgin for 4-5yrs now and any problems I Have had have been quickly resolved. I had contemplated taking the Sky package which was around £10? or something ridiculously low although when I investigated I found out I would need a BT line installed which would cost £150 so I just stayed where I was. Not to mention the fact the massive speed they were offering for broadband wasnt available in my area so I didnt think it was worth all the hassle of switching.

Even when I had moved in to my property the flat previously had telewest/virgin so it didnt take long to reconnect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with AOL which is fine as long but the technical support is generally nonexistent and it took ages for them to finally admit they throttled download speeds during peak times. Also don't bother with the bloated aol software as its just irritating.

Theres a good forum here which has some useful posts

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=77

Download the Adam and Joe & Jon Richardson podcasts now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with AOL which is fine as long but the technical support is generally nonexistent and it took ages for them to finally admit they throttled download speeds during peak times. Also don't bother with the bloated aol software as its just irritating.

You forgot to mention dont try and cancel your AOL account also as its almost impossible....

[ame]

[/ame]

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for everyone's help and views. I think we're going to see if we can get Virgin Media to get their acts together as we live in a cable area and get broadband and maybe also phone from them. I'll see how it goes and hopefully we'll have it installed before term starts. The previous students used Virgin Media so it shouldn't be too hard to get it set up again hopefully.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Urghh ISPs are a nightmare. The first 5 reviews for Virgin Media on moneysupermarket are titled: "Avoid at all costs!", "Totally useless avoid like the plague", "POOR", "The service from hell" and "Richard-You should be ashamed!" http://www.moneysupermarket.com/c/broadband/internet/providers/virgin-media-168/broadband-xl-249/

Most ISPs seem to be crap though, you just can't seem to win. We even have a nice impersonal letter congratulating us on moving in to a Virgin Media area as students. "Come on students join the cable revolution!". The first line of the letter reads: "Congratulations on choosing Nottingham as you're University city!" -- they can't even get simple grammar right.

Anyway I guess we'll have to take a gamble on it working because the previous people had it and the cable modem is still there.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Similar to SZA’s Kill Bill. The word “kill” had been initially also cut out of Taylor Swift’s Fortnight. But it seems like they are now playing an unedited version.
    • Also hopefully won't get my head bitten off for this but I'd say of the current Radio 1 DJs the one arguably most similar to Scott Mills's latter time on Radio 1 would be Mollie. I'm not saying she's as good as Scott was to be clear but she is that sort of vibe. 'Future Pop' is exactly the sort of music Scott would be championing and you can tell Mollie has the same passion for it that Scott did. There's that Party Anthems link too - a show Matt & Mol do that previously Scott did and they bring a similar energy to how Scott did that makes it a fun listen. Matt & Mollie seem to just have that natural connection with the listeners that Scott & Chris did that you can't manufacture.
    • I find at the minute I'm a bit of a nomad when it comes to radio stations. Often the Radio 1 playlist really doesn't appeal to me these days and I did wonder is it just me tiring of new music but then I'll listen to Future Pop and Party Anthems and there's loads of tunes on there that I love and they're excellent listens but just too few of those make it to the playlist. Radio 2 may arguably be more to my taste music wise but also often feels too rooted on the past. Plus much of the content just doesn't appeal to me and verges on the 'mumsy' side. Plus Radio 2's new music can feel very 'middle of the road' - just because I don't enjoy some of the Radio 1 new stuff it doesn't mean I want Take That & Will Young as 'new music'. For me currently if I'm tuning in for radio it'll be Jordan North on Capital Breakfast, on Radio 1 Matt & Mollie, (if Jamie is off)  Going Home and Sam & Danni plus there's also Capital Dance and Mistajam. They all hit the mark for me in a way other shows don't.
    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
    • Practically speaking, Riley & Coe on 6Music is the answer to that problem - but I get your overall point.
    • Yes and thats the huge selling point after 6pm as always has been in the evening. As when I started listening to radio 1 about eleven twelve years ago its the station that got me into music new and familiar artists and bands. I think the issue with a lot of the new music shows being crammed in length of the shows and not all is live there’s less chance for a presenter to tell you about the band or artist or have the impression of chatting to the listener by reading out texts and emails or including voice notes. I’m really enjoying Jack Saunders’ new music show as thats how you do a show like that on Radio 1 good mix of genres but from 10pm onwards you don’t have the presenter chatting to the listener or that live feel as sometimes you need at that time.
    • Given one of yesterday’s ‘bangers’ was Noah Kahan’s Stick Season, I doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...