Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Fearne: I've never understood how I am irritating you so much


Jono

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't think Fearne deserves her current spot on Radio 1. I saw the word 'commitment' in someone's post above. How 'commited' was she to The Chart Show? What percentage of shows was Reggie flying solo, when she was supposed to be there? Hmm.

I find her whole attitude incredibly patronising. She is also pretty shouty and over enthusiastic in a rather false manner.

Constructive criticism. I do feel sorry for her, however, for receiving personally abusive comments, texts and emails from morons who can't express themselves properly.

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in terms of committed, she IS committed - to her CAREER, but not necessarily solely to the BBC... and as I don't see a golden lock on her contract ala Graham Norton, Wossy or others, I see no reason why she SHOULDN'T go off and do other things to further her career really.

If she really doesn't 'deserve' her Radio1 spot (and quite honestly I think if she didn't deserve the spot, she wouldn't be there at all, so I don't see the logic of that particular argument as rarely is any reason for her not deserving the spot actually given), someone suggest some NEW talent who would, as we don't want to be dredging up certain DJs until they're old enough to be grandparents of most of the target audience (Only John Peel could really pull that off, and maybe Moyles will be able to if he stays at Radio1 that long, which I doubt he will do. I know Westwood's over 50 now but he's used more as a stooge presenter and butt of jokes rather than as a serious presenter).

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing 'new' about her, in any sense of the word... ;)

Maybe that's the reason Sara makes me :sleep: so much... but to me she fits all the criticism people throw at Fearne about being falsely overenthusiastic etc... remember she only got the breakfast show because of her mate Zoe Ball and she LOST a shedload of listeners, yeah great DJ that :rolleyes:

Sod it, I've TRIED to understand these reasons people like Cox but I just can't, it's still more than the Fearne critics have tried to do though from what I can see and the fact is Radio1 must be happy with her listener figures, I think a lot of people just get on her back because she hasn't reached the dizzy heights of Moyles and Mills and because they weren't happy with losing Jo Whiley (I wasn't really either, by the way,but I can see why she had to move and it turns out from recent reports even she felt it was the right time).

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a difference when Fearne fans have to put up with the constant criticism of the haters, often unfounded (the 'facts' that get stated often turning out to be rumours) or just repetitive... a lot of them don't seem to have 'accepted' that people like Fearne (you seem to be an exception to this). I have accepted it in a way, otherwise I wouldn't even be trying to understand it. :)

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sara Cox would be ideal.

I really like sara, i think her slightly wacky sense of humour is brilliant, and her story telling is good. I never listened to her on breakfast- too young, but i find it hard to think of why so many listeners would jump ship unless she's changed massively since.

The next RAJAR's may be quite telling of Sara as she will have done quite a bit of the work...

etheridge_tom.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi this is my first post and dont want to say anything to cause any problems but regarding Fearne, I admire her business savvy attitude and ambition and of course noone deserves abuse and hatred. However I have never felt that her presenting skills were superior to anyone else on the station. I think that presenters such as Scott have desired a career in radio from a young age and those such as Greg James committed themselves to student radio and used thier talent and determination to make headway into the radio industry and annie mac worked her way up from the bottom as a BA for Zane Lowe. I think it is this desire and pure passion that makes thier shows so good and potentially stand out from someone like fearne's, whose passion appears to lie with tv as she often prioritises it above her radio show. Maybe if the mid morning slot had been given to someone with a background in and passion for radio they would have been more 'grateful' for the opportunity and put their all into the job and prioritised it, whereas sometimes I get the impression that Fearne sees it as another string to her bow and would drop it if something better came along. Sorry rambling post and its just my opinion but I do think that passion talent and loyalty is sometimes more important than being the right age and a household name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi this is my first post and dont want to say anything to cause any problems but regarding Fearne, I admire her business savvy attitude and ambition and of course noone deserves abuse and hatred. However I have never felt that her presenting skills were superior to anyone else on the station. I think that presenters such as Scott have desired a career in radio from a young age and those such as Greg James committed themselves to student radio and used thier talent and determination to make headway into the radio industry and annie mac worked her way up from the bottom as a BA for Zane Lowe. I think it is this desire and pure passion that makes thier shows so good and potentially stand out from someone like fearne's, whose passion appears to lie with tv as she often prioritises it above her radio show. Maybe if the mid morning slot had been given to someone with a background in and passion for radio they would have been more 'grateful' for the opportunity and put their all into the job and prioritised it, whereas sometimes I get the impression that Fearne sees it as another string to her bow and would drop it if something better came along. Sorry rambling post and its just my opinion but I do think that passion talent and loyalty is sometimes more important than being the right age and a household name.

Excellent first post. I couldn't have put it much better myself.

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really like sara, i think her slightly wacky sense of humour is brilliant, and her story telling is good. I never listened to her on breakfast- too young, but i find it hard to think of why so many listeners would jump ship unless she's changed massively since.

The next RAJAR's may be quite telling of Sara as she will have done quite a bit of the work...

but I don't think time another DJ fills in is taken into account?

This may sound really stupid.. But why does Fearne have 'haters'? I mean, of course there is always gunna be a few people that don't get you for everyone, but what's the matter with Fearne?

Exactly my point.

Hi this is my first post and dont want to say anything to cause any problems but regarding Fearne, I admire her business savvy attitude and ambition and of course noone deserves abuse and hatred. However I have never felt that her presenting skills were superior to anyone else on the station. I think that presenters such as Scott have desired a career in radio from a young age and those such as Greg James committed themselves to student radio and used thier talent and determination to make headway into the radio industry and annie mac worked her way up from the bottom as a BA for Zane Lowe. I think it is this desire and pure passion that makes thier shows so good and potentially stand out from someone like fearne's, whose passion appears to lie with tv as she often prioritises it above her radio show. Maybe if the mid morning slot had been given to someone with a background in and passion for radio they would have been more 'grateful' for the opportunity and put their all into the job and prioritised it, whereas sometimes I get the impression that Fearne sees it as another string to her bow and would drop it if something better came along. Sorry rambling post and its just my opinion but I do think that passion talent and loyalty is sometimes more important than being the right age and a household name.

So how did Fearne start out then? That's a good set of points and all but we have to remember she has been on radio1 for some years herself, so what if she started in TV? I don't think Radio1 would have put her straight on Radio1 with NO Radio experience, not even as part of a duo.

Also I agree she's not the best presenter on the station, I just think we've had far worse and that doesn't seem to have been recognised.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So how did Fearne start out then? That's a good set of points and all but we have to remember she has been on radio1 for some years herself, so what if she started in TV? I don't think Radio1 would have put her straight on Radio1 with NO Radio experience, not even as part of a duo.

Also I agree she's not the best presenter on the station, I just think we've had far worse and that doesn't seem to have been recognised.

Yes you are right I did neglect the fact that Fearne has been on Radio one for many years herself, sorry. I was more refering to her initial ambitions, it seems she is far more concerned with television etc and sees radio as a back up in a way, not that it matters that she began in tv its just even now when she has a major radio one slot she does still seem to prioritise her tv work. Whereas others on the station have dedicated thier careers to radio and it just feels as if they have to take a back seat because Fearne is an established name when theres nothing to suggest that they wouldnt be able to do just as good job and more regularly. But thats just my opinion and I appreciate that theres a lot about fearne i dont know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Fearne deserves her current spot on Radio 1. .

I swear if I see many more "I love Fearne", "I hate Fearne" posts, I'm gonna scream. Actually sit and scream.

She's in the Slot. And, as I have posted on aled.info, if people don't like her, there ARE such things as "off" buttons.

I do appreciate there are Career DJs such as Scott, who have wanted radio from a young age, but this ain't always gonna happen, so we need to live with that.

I find Fearne nice + light for the time of day. Would you want Zane Lowe in on a 1000 hours slot after all?!

No, I didn't think so.

Just a small, additional point, btw.... Fearne is a female (in case anyone hadn't noticed)..... A talented, little lady.... good TV presenter, on-the-ball with fashion, well turned out, good radio broadcaster...... I can't help thinking there is more than a little jealousy in people's opinions. As someone else was saying in another topic, Vernon Kay's first priority is TV, yet does he get slated THIS much?

No, he doesn't.

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always nice to be quoted, but it's unecessary to single out my objections to Fearne really. I'm not the only person who isn't keen on her. I have never used the word 'hate' incidentally.

Anyhow, I agree this thread is becoming somewhat dull, and shall not be participating in it any longer.

Happy now?

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always nice to be quoted, but it's unecessary to single out my objections to Fearne really. I'm not the only person who isn't keen on her. I have never used the word 'hate' incidentally.

Anyhow, I agree this thread is becoming somewhat dull, and shall not be participating in it any longer.

Happy now?

Actually, no, funnily enough... I wasn't singling you out specifically, however I felt your comment was typical of reactions to the Cotton. To say she doesn't "deserve" the Slot is ridiculous. I dare say she would have been fired by now if she was as bad as people say. But she hasn't, has she?

There's potential there. Plenty of it. As I have posted before, the Fearne Cotton/Gok Wan discussion was fan-blooming-tastic. Great rapport, great discussion, great chemistry. Let's see some more, Ms Cotton - you can do it!!

I do use the word "hate" personally. Or "love". Sometimes there is simply no other option. Actually, how do you sit middle of the road?!?!

Delta Machine, Depeche Mode - buy NOW !!

http://youtu.be/59dZzXLPRg0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of people haven't used the word hate, but they do take every opportunity to criticise, yet I am told to shut up (by people who seem to imagine they have power to do so when they don't, I might add) and accused of hating when I do the same for a certain other DJ... Seems somehow when it's Fearne it's NOT hating? :rolleyes:

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just a thought when Fearne was with Reggie and Fearne covered for Vernon or Sara for example she had the chart/request show off but when Annie covered for Fearne she did her own show as well.

I'd say weekend presenters like Vernon who TV is their main passion is fine but the 5 day a week slots should go to presenters who really want to work in radio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • When Scott and Chris announced their departure from R1, I remember there was lots of speculation about who would take over the 1pm slot. Matt and Mollie were talked about a lot on here, and at the time I really didn't rate them as a replacement. A few years on, I see that I was totally wrong. They are such a good pairing, and it's the same kind of duo as Scott and Chris, in that they are real life friends, who spend time together in their real lives, which really does come across on air. True friends having a laugh together, and everyone is invited is how it feels to me now. I never thought about it before, but I agree with @coffeeandgin that Mollie is the Scott of the duo - pop obsessed and maybe a litte ditsy, but so funny, and in need of someone to anchor to or bounce off.  It seems that Matt is the kind of Chris of the duo then in that comparison, the one with the ideas, but also needs another person to make the magic happen. I know I'm outside of the R1 demographic, and maybe Dean and Vicky were meant to be younger and fresher, but I'm sure in my younger years I would have preferred to listen to two people who had a genuine connection and could really make each other laugh, as well as have the listeners laugh along. That was the Scott and Chris factor for me, and I think the only pair that come close to that now are Matt and Mollie.
    • Find Noah Kahan is just busker music. I mean I was pleasantly surprised that Ezra collective were in session for Jack Saunders on his new shoes and he is playing their latest track wouldn’t have thought few years back that at 6pm in the evening jazz music would be played. I hope if can get the green light and launch the 00s/10s station that the focus is on more new music be it pop mainstream and alternative genres on the main 1
    • Scott's show is perfect for the office. If Matt and Mol have a podcast I'd listen to that. All the fun without the Gen Z rappers. 
    • Similar to SZA’s Kill Bill, the word “kill” had been initially cut out of Taylor Swift’s Fortnight. But it seems like they are now playing an unedited version.
    • Also hopefully won't get my head bitten off for this but I'd say of the current Radio 1 DJs the one arguably most similar to Scott Mills's latter time on Radio 1 would be Mollie. I'm not saying she's as good as Scott was to be clear but she is that sort of vibe. 'Future Pop' is exactly the sort of music Scott would be championing and you can tell Mollie has the same passion for it that Scott did. There's that Party Anthems link too - a show Matt & Mol do that previously Scott did and they bring a similar energy to how Scott did that makes it a fun listen. Matt & Mollie seem to just have that natural connection with the listeners that Scott & Chris did that you can't manufacture.
    • I find at the minute I'm a bit of a nomad when it comes to radio stations. Often the Radio 1 playlist really doesn't appeal to me these days and I did wonder is it just me tiring of new music but then I'll listen to Future Pop and Party Anthems and there's loads of tunes on there that I love and they're excellent listens but just too few of those make it to the playlist. Radio 2 may arguably be more to my taste music wise but also often feels too rooted on the past. Plus much of the content just doesn't appeal to me and verges on the 'mumsy' side. Plus Radio 2's new music can feel very 'middle of the road' - just because I don't enjoy some of the Radio 1 new stuff it doesn't mean I want Take That & Will Young as 'new music'. For me currently if I'm tuning in for radio it'll be Jordan North on Capital Breakfast, on Radio 1 Matt & Mollie, (if Jamie is off)  Going Home and Sam & Danni plus there's also Capital Dance and Mistajam. They all hit the mark for me in a way other shows don't.
    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
×
×
  • Create New...