Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Jeremy Clarkson in four-letter rant to boy


Jono

Recommended Posts

He's 12 years old! If this is the kind of stick a 12 year old kid gets for taking a photo of one of his idols when he happened to see him, god knows what would happen if he actually did something bad.

You would never dream of doing that to anyone because, erm, youre not a kid whos astonished that hes just seen his hero.

Jeremy Clarkson is this kids idol, it comes with the job. Its nothing to do with respect, what 12 year old boy would want to show off to his class mates who he saw when he was on holiday?

Jeeez.

So if someone took a photo of you while you were asleep on the beach you'd be perfectly fine with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I love the article though. The sensationalist reporting. Yeah, we needed to know he owns every Top Gear DVD and watches every week. Surely everyone knows Jeremy is quite miserable, it doesn't take much to learn that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So?

He was on a private holiday. It's invasive. He was asleep. The boy should have had better manners. He's 12, not an infant.

Exactly. I think it's the fact that he was asleep that makes it completely understandable. If Jeremy had been awake, and the kid had asked, I'm sure he'd have had no problem with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not bloody famous.

What difference does it make? Maybe he doesn't consider himself famous. He presents television and writes a newspaper column. Scott doesn't consider himself famous. Should he have to put up with people taking pictures of him asleep? There's a line, and the kids crossed it by not asking. He could have kept a distance and took one, but presumably he went in for a close up.

The guy's on a holiday and trying to get away from it all. It wasn't exactly HMV in London was it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What difference does it make? Maybe he doesn't consider himself famous. He presents television and writes a newspaper column. Scott doesn't consider himself famous. Should he have to put up with people taking pictures of him asleep? There's a line, and the kids crossed it by not asking. He could have kept a distance and took one, but presumably he went in for a close up.

The guy's on a holiday and trying to get away from it all. It wasn't exactly HMV in London was it.

Stick to the facts.

Its different because he knows hes a recognisable figure. He knows people are gonna want to talk to him and take photos anywhere he goes, especially kids. Its what bloody happens when your face is all over tv and newspapers, and people actually happen to be fans. God only knows why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stick to the facts.

And you're going by what the father says? There are no real facts until we get the other side of the story. That's the worst reporting I've read in a while. The guy had pound signs in his eyes when he rang The Mirror about that.

He didn't get the photograph to send to Heat, so he made a story out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stick to the facts.

Its different because he knows hes a recognisable figure. He knows people are gonna want to talk to him and take photos anywhere he goes, especially kids.

Yes, and he's a teenager. He should learn not to just take photographs of people like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not about legality, it's about ethics.

Who decided it was about Ethics?

I Like Jeremy but its part of the deal famous people get photographed he needs to get over it and get a grip ranting at a 12 year old is much easier than ranting at a 20 or 30 year old.

My Photos are online at www.markohare.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who decided it was about Ethics?

We did. This is the argument. Go running to the newspapers if you like, but there's a flip side. Where do you draw the line? "Oh it's okay to take pictures of celebrities, but mummy, why can't I take a picture of this fat man on the beach here in Cromer?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
    • Practically speaking, Riley & Coe on 6Music is the answer to that problem - but I get your overall point.
    • Yes and thats the huge selling point after 6pm as always has been in the evening. As when I started listening to radio 1 about eleven twelve years ago its the station that got me into music new and familiar artists and bands. I think the issue with a lot of the new music shows being crammed in length of the shows and not all is live there’s less chance for a presenter to tell you about the band or artist or have the impression of chatting to the listener by reading out texts and emails or including voice notes. I’m really enjoying Jack Saunders’ new music show as thats how you do a show like that on Radio 1 good mix of genres but from 10pm onwards you don’t have the presenter chatting to the listener or that live feel as sometimes you need at that time.
    • Given one of yesterday’s ‘bangers’ was Noah Kahan’s Stick Season, I doubt it.
    • No chart show on the 24th May because of Big Weekend.
    • How has it been working early mornings as a parent, Chris? Is it harder to juggle than the 1-4 slot?
    • I still think Dua Lipa could make the line-up. She's in the Live Lounge soon. Would be a scoop if they had two of the key Glastonbury performers.
×
×
  • Create New...