Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

"Chris Taker", BBC pay Radio 1's Moyles EXTRA £75k


Ad

Recommended Posts

m2logo.gif

Exclusive By Pete Samson, Mirror.co.uk

RADIO 1 star Chris Moyles is getting £75,000 on top of his massive salary - just for playing his own jingles. Chris, 32, picks up £630,000 a year - but has a staggering deal in which the Beeb pays out £15 each time he airs a ditty he wrote.

And the motormouth DJ makes sure his short tunes hit the big notes - as he broadcast them 5,000 times in the past year alone.

One jingle brazenly brags: "Chris Moyles on Radio 1/He ain't good-looking but hey, he's rich." But last night his money-spinning contract was sparking fury among MPs and watchdogs.

John Whittingdale, head of the Commons Culture select committee, blasted: "The BBC is already paying him a hefty salary and he is able to earn even more at the touch of a button.

"There seems to be a clear conflict of interests here and it seems completely inappropriate."

Mediawatch chief John Beyer also branded it a conflict of interest and added: "BBC governors should investigate this matter with immediate effect.

"Mr Moyles has control over how many jingles he plays on his show and therefore determines how much extra he will be paid each day - with no one regulating him.

"Governors must satisfy themselves no malpractice is taking place, which is only right and proper on behalf of licence payers."

Chris composes the quirky clips for his 7am-10am show with specialist firm Music 4. The Performing Right Society - which distributes performance royalties to composers - charges the BBC £15 a time and passes it on to him.

One listener claimed he played his jingles 10 times in just one hour last week. And the Daily Mirror heard them used 19 times during his three-hour show. It is not the first time Beeb chiefs have come under fire over stars' earnings.

There was an outcry when it emerged Jonathan Ross was on an £18million deal and Little Britain pair David Walliams and Matt Lucas had been handed £6million.

Yesterday, the BBC insisted the DJ had done nothing wrong.

A Radio 1 spokesman said: "He writes jingles and receives payment when they are played. This is completely legitimate.

"But we refute any suggestion that he is playing them more frequently."

And a governors' spokeswoman added: "Chris Moyles would be subject to editorial guidelines, which he would have to adhere to."

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_headline=chris-taker-&method=full&objectid=18266722&siteid=94762-name_page.html

507033771.183.1247039672.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I must have missed that yesterday, sorry! Scott did make the same tongue in cheek comment on today's show about Rylan. It's a shame Rylan isn't the go to cover for Scott, I assume his commitments away from R2 prevent that. I enjoyed his last cover stint. Spoony is the go to stand in for the mid afternoon slot (he's covering again week after next while Scott's off getting married).   In that case, I think you're right! 
    • Not that last minute. Scott was talking about it on his own show yesterday, saying he and Rylan have a deal where they cover each other's shows but Rylan only covers Scott when he can be bothered!
    • Sorry I should have been clearer, I meant daytime weekday. Weekend shows would count as a 'step up' from overnights for OJ.
    • If we're counting the overnight slot, OJ Borg regularly covers weekend shows.
    • The only weekday R2 DJ who would ever cover a weekend slot?!
    • What I assume is a very last minute change... Scott Mills is in for Rylan today.
    • Radio 1 at Parklife will be presented by Vicky and Nat. Nat is currently listed to present her usual Sunday show on that weekend but I imagine that will change and someone else will be doing it instead. The Radio 1 presenters at Download will be Daniel P Carter, Jack Saunders, Alyx Holcombe and Nels Hylton.
    • Nat in for Dean with Vicky as well that day.
    • So the end of weekend afternoons this week - new show is July 1st.
    • Arielle is in for Greg on Monday 27th May.
    • He’s definitely gotten better and the show has sounded fine this week. I think it been at its best when it’s been Katie and Jamie or Vick and Katie. Vick and Jamie are ok together, but I do think the show sounds better when it’s Vick and Katie and therefore I still don’t really understand the point of the trio.    Jamie is, however, a lot better than Danny Beard! 
    • The RAJAR coming on later this year reflecting later summer to autumn will be interesting to how it reflects Matt and Mollie in afternoons to the revised changes on radio 1’s new music slots and the schedule re-shuffling Radio 3 introducing a new slate of programmes. Then, later on this year have speech radio stations having domestic political coverage of the election but also America’s presidential election.  
    • I actually caught snippets of today’s show, and I found it much better than the last time I listened. I have made it no secret that I like Jamie on the radio, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed Matt & him together last year. People have criticised him for not being relatable, but I have to agree with the comment above that I have always found him a naturally warm person to listen to. Maybe the going home set up was something that needed settling in and things are starting to take shape.  It must have been difficult for him joining an established duo in Vick & Katie to begin with.  Jamie was great on something songs today, fully engaged in the caller and sounded like a real presenter. Maybe he is doing as a lot of us hoped and really learning as he goes, how to do it properly. 
    • Agree with this. The anti-Jamie feeling was IMO quite influenced by the negativity around him replacing Jordan, since Jordan was exceptional and also universally loved. When people mention Danny and Jamie in the same sentence about bad hiring decisions I almost choke - Jamie may not be perfect but he's several leagues better than Danny already and has bags of potential. Danny is poor and has shown zero potential...
    • Jamie started 4 March, and the figures only going up to 31 March, so it isn't reliable. But it has shown the numbers have dropped in afternoons compared to last quarter. It looks like it's Capital's gain.
×
×
  • Create New...