Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Is Scott sounding less slick as of late?


OohErr

Recommended Posts

I don't listen to the live show very often, but one thing that's struck me when I've been listening over the last few days is that Scott isn't sounding as slick as normal. He's rarely talking up to the vocal properly, or on occasion crashing the vocal. His backtimings also not the best at the moment.

At least, I think. Has anybody else noticed? After 17 years, the Heart slickness might be wearing off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't listen to the live show very often, but one thing that's struck me when I've been listening over the last few days is that Scott isn't sounding as slick as normal. He's rarely talking up to the vocal properly, or on occasion crashing the vocal. His backtimings also not the best at the moment.

At least, I think. Has anybody else noticed? After 17 years, the Heart slickness might be wearing off.

I didn't notice any problems during today's show, maybe he saw your post lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just listening back to the podcast from yesterday when Scott and Chris covered breakfast. I loved the show, the Kathy from EastEnders, red eye and Snappy Snaps whooooooo's along with the waking up song mistiming were hilarious! Did anyone else notice that Scott crashed the vocal quite badly on Blonde & Melissa Steel track? It's not like Scott to be doing that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just listening back to the podcast from yesterday when Scott and Chris covered breakfast. I loved the show, the Kathy from EastEnders, red eye and Snappy Snaps whooooooo's along with the waking up song mistiming were hilarious! Did anyone else notice that Scott crashed the vocal quite badly on Blonde & Melissa Steel track? It's not like Scott to be doing that at all.

I'll check it out now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could just be a bit stressed out at the moment with the contract ending and all? Maybe they haven't given him a verdict yet, or they have and it's not a good one :( Why is he covering for Grimmy on Friday, I'm getting all paranoid now...

well if he's still being used as cover on breakfast and the chart show (which he's doing on sunday week) he's probably not about to be sacked any time soon !

maybe hes just a bit upset abut Zane leaving. He did a handover wth him for 8 years after all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well if he's still being used as cover on breakfast and the chart show (which he's doing on sunday week) he's probably not about to be sacked any time soon !

maybe hes just a bit upset abut Zane leaving. He did a handover wth him for 8 years after all...

No. That's not the case, he wouldn't be particularly upset about Zane leaving to the point where his broadcasts aren't as oily.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Scott's shows are still extremely slick. His timings with the news are mostly flawless and the silly elements of his show (Bamboleo Wednesday, echos on the "wwwwhhhhhooooooo"s, pulling the "Yaaaassss GaGa" clips on command, the list is endless) don't even sound like they need any skill in the studio because he is so flawless with that sort of thing. He also very rarely messes up Innuendo Bingo which, again, doesn't sound like a difficult element to run technically because he doesn't make it sound difficult. These things that take skill or "slickness" to do we don't even acknowledge half the time simply because he does it so effortlessly. I doubt a looming contract end or a leaving colleague are even on his mind when he is on air doing his job.

The geek formally known as Scott Mills Guru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Scott's shows are still extremely slick. His timings with the news are mostly flawless and the silly elements of his show (Bamboleo Wednesday, echos on the "wwwwhhhhhooooooo"s, pulling the "Yaaaassss GaGa" clips on command, the list is endless) don't even sound like they need any skill in the studio because he is so flawless with that sort of thing. He also very rarely messes up Innuendo Bingo which, again, doesn't sound like a difficult element to run technically because he doesn't make it sound difficult. These things that take skill or "slickness" to do we don't even acknowledge half the time simply because he does it so effortlessly. I doubt a looming contract end or a leaving colleague are even on his mind when he is on air doing his job.

I'm pretty sure the "whos" and other SFX you mentioned are available on-demand through the touch-screen system directly in front of a presenter; which doesn't actually require much skill.

As for Innuendo Bingo, well, it's an amusing feature but I'm sure every host on Radio 1 (excluding Gemma) could pull it off quite well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure the "whos" and other SFX you mentioned are available on-demand through the touch-screen system directly in front of a presenter; which doesn't actually require much skill.

As for Innuendo Bingo, well, it's an amusing feature but I'm sure every host on Radio 1 (excluding Gemma) could pull it off quite well.

Watch the new Innuendo Bingo. 10:10 in. Proves the whos are live

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slightly OT, but how does the touch screen thing work? Can you play clips directly from it? When Matt Edmondson once hosted innuendo bingo it looked like he was only using the touch screen, but Scott seems to play the clips the same way he plays songs and jingles. What's the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Similar to SZA’s Kill Bill, the word “kill” had been initially cut out of Taylor Swift’s Fortnight. But it seems like they are now playing an unedited version.
    • Also hopefully won't get my head bitten off for this but I'd say of the current Radio 1 DJs the one arguably most similar to Scott Mills's latter time on Radio 1 would be Mollie. I'm not saying she's as good as Scott was to be clear but she is that sort of vibe. 'Future Pop' is exactly the sort of music Scott would be championing and you can tell Mollie has the same passion for it that Scott did. There's that Party Anthems link too - a show Matt & Mol do that previously Scott did and they bring a similar energy to how Scott did that makes it a fun listen. Matt & Mollie seem to just have that natural connection with the listeners that Scott & Chris did that you can't manufacture.
    • I find at the minute I'm a bit of a nomad when it comes to radio stations. Often the Radio 1 playlist really doesn't appeal to me these days and I did wonder is it just me tiring of new music but then I'll listen to Future Pop and Party Anthems and there's loads of tunes on there that I love and they're excellent listens but just too few of those make it to the playlist. Radio 2 may arguably be more to my taste music wise but also often feels too rooted on the past. Plus much of the content just doesn't appeal to me and verges on the 'mumsy' side. Plus Radio 2's new music can feel very 'middle of the road' - just because I don't enjoy some of the Radio 1 new stuff it doesn't mean I want Take That & Will Young as 'new music'. For me currently if I'm tuning in for radio it'll be Jordan North on Capital Breakfast, on Radio 1 Matt & Mollie, (if Jamie is off)  Going Home and Sam & Danni plus there's also Capital Dance and Mistajam. They all hit the mark for me in a way other shows don't.
    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
    • Practically speaking, Riley & Coe on 6Music is the answer to that problem - but I get your overall point.
    • Yes and thats the huge selling point after 6pm as always has been in the evening. As when I started listening to radio 1 about eleven twelve years ago its the station that got me into music new and familiar artists and bands. I think the issue with a lot of the new music shows being crammed in length of the shows and not all is live there’s less chance for a presenter to tell you about the band or artist or have the impression of chatting to the listener by reading out texts and emails or including voice notes. I’m really enjoying Jack Saunders’ new music show as thats how you do a show like that on Radio 1 good mix of genres but from 10pm onwards you don’t have the presenter chatting to the listener or that live feel as sometimes you need at that time.
    • Given one of yesterday’s ‘bangers’ was Noah Kahan’s Stick Season, I doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...