Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

People set to take drugs live on Channel 4


MrDoovdeHaxorz

Recommended Posts

Here's a story I'm shocked Viv hasn't posted yet... and I can't be arsed coming up with a Daily Fail headline for the thread title.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2011/05/12/channel-4-set-to-broadcast-class-a-drug-use-on-live-television-115875-23124067/

Channel 4 set to broadcast Class A drug use on live television

by Simon Boyle, Daily Mirror 12/05/2011

CHANNEL 4 yesterday announced controversial plans to show hard drugs being taken live on television.

The four-part series, Drugs Live, will track the effects of the substances on the user.

7IqxW

The broadcaster’s chief creative officer Jay Hunt vowed to bring a “sense of mischief” to the channel.

Producers claim the show would “bring much needed clarity to a social issue often mired in controversy and confusion”.

But campaign group Mediawatch’s director Vivienne Pattison last night blasted the programme. She said: “Clearly there is a roll for educational broadcasting but this programme sounds very alarming.

“Allowing drugs to be taken on live television is seriously irresponsible and sends out the wrong messages.”

Ms Hunt confirmed Drugs Live would see people take a variety of drugs, including those in the most lethal Class A group, live on television. It was not clear which would be used – but Class A includes heroin, cocaine, crack, ecstasy and LSD.

She said: “I believe Channel 4’s future lies in pieces that take risks.” She insisted that drugs would not be administered in a TV studio but a safe environment.

Ms Hunt added: “The Class A drugs thing is something that I think is an incredibly thought-provoking social policy, which I think Channel 4 can be at the forefront of and actually provide some interesting and useful data on.

“There are environments in which you can legally test Class A drugs, supervised, monitored, and with the proper medical support to look at the impact that they have on individuals.”

It is possible for medical institutions and universities to apply to the Home Office to get permission for experiments on a controlled drug.

And Channel 4 producers said they were in talks with centres worldwide.

The show is being planned for later this year but a Home Office spokesman said: “Class A drugs are illegal. Channel Four must be aware of its responsibilities as a public service broadcaster.

“If a criminal offence takes place, it will be a matter for the police and the Crown Prosecution Service.”

Reports that Danny Boyle's Trainspotting (which also contains graphic scenes of drugtaking and it's effects) will be shown directly after are thought to be wide of the mark...

I find it ironic that it's Channel 4 who are broadcasting this, when it's ITV that drives people to drugs really. I also think this will be like the Derren Brown Russian Roulette thing, it will happen outside of the UK (maybe somewhere like Amsterdam) so the program makers would not really be subject to UK law, regardless of what the Home Office says.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it will also be anti-drugs, as it will show the immediate and possibly longer term negative effects. I think it will also bust some of the bullshit myths about certain drugs that are less dangerous than the government would have us believe (but won't make legal because they can't find a way to tax them. I bet a lot of things would become legal if the govt could find a way to tax them).

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm fairly anti-drug as well, but we all know that there are people who do them in their various forms anyways.

If they are pay very close attention to not glorify it or condone it, then I say let them make the program and show it. Like with everything else, if people don't like the subject matter or think they are likely to be offended by the content but choose to watch it then they don't really have a right to complain, nobody makes them watch it.

Not impressed with censorship

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they already showed the moment a guy died on BBC1 this week, which is basically a snuff movie when you think about it. That was bad enough even I turned away at that point... I was watching the show but didn't realise that bit was coming up til about halfway through.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
What show was that?

It was called Inside the Human Body. Also showed a birth but wasn't quite so graphic about that. It did show how seeing fictional death in violent movies etc does NOT desensitise someone to seeing a real death.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it ironic that it's Channel 4 who are broadcasting this, when it's ITV that drives people to drugs really. I also think this will be like the Derren Brown Russian Roulette thing, it will happen outside of the UK (maybe somewhere like Amsterdam) so the program makers would not really be subject to UK law, regardless of what the Home Office says.

Was the Derren Brown thing real?

*cough* Programme.

OMASM. Radio presenters are like fruit. Matt is my kumquat and Scott is blatantly my orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Similar to SZA’s Kill Bill, the word “kill” had been initially cut out of Taylor Swift’s Fortnight. But it seems like they are now playing an unedited version.
    • Also hopefully won't get my head bitten off for this but I'd say of the current Radio 1 DJs the one arguably most similar to Scott Mills's latter time on Radio 1 would be Mollie. I'm not saying she's as good as Scott was to be clear but she is that sort of vibe. 'Future Pop' is exactly the sort of music Scott would be championing and you can tell Mollie has the same passion for it that Scott did. There's that Party Anthems link too - a show Matt & Mol do that previously Scott did and they bring a similar energy to how Scott did that makes it a fun listen. Matt & Mollie seem to just have that natural connection with the listeners that Scott & Chris did that you can't manufacture.
    • I find at the minute I'm a bit of a nomad when it comes to radio stations. Often the Radio 1 playlist really doesn't appeal to me these days and I did wonder is it just me tiring of new music but then I'll listen to Future Pop and Party Anthems and there's loads of tunes on there that I love and they're excellent listens but just too few of those make it to the playlist. Radio 2 may arguably be more to my taste music wise but also often feels too rooted on the past. Plus much of the content just doesn't appeal to me and verges on the 'mumsy' side. Plus Radio 2's new music can feel very 'middle of the road' - just because I don't enjoy some of the Radio 1 new stuff it doesn't mean I want Take That & Will Young as 'new music'. For me currently if I'm tuning in for radio it'll be Jordan North on Capital Breakfast, on Radio 1 Matt & Mollie, (if Jamie is off)  Going Home and Sam & Danni plus there's also Capital Dance and Mistajam. They all hit the mark for me in a way other shows don't.
    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
    • Practically speaking, Riley & Coe on 6Music is the answer to that problem - but I get your overall point.
    • Yes and thats the huge selling point after 6pm as always has been in the evening. As when I started listening to radio 1 about eleven twelve years ago its the station that got me into music new and familiar artists and bands. I think the issue with a lot of the new music shows being crammed in length of the shows and not all is live there’s less chance for a presenter to tell you about the band or artist or have the impression of chatting to the listener by reading out texts and emails or including voice notes. I’m really enjoying Jack Saunders’ new music show as thats how you do a show like that on Radio 1 good mix of genres but from 10pm onwards you don’t have the presenter chatting to the listener or that live feel as sometimes you need at that time.
    • Given one of yesterday’s ‘bangers’ was Noah Kahan’s Stick Season, I doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...