Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Internet Culture


Monitorabbit

Recommended Posts

I was surprised when Moyles started making anti-Scientology remarks this morning. Of course we've had other internet fads and memes publicised on Radio 1 in the past, notably Chocolate Rain and South Carolina Answers a Question, but this was the first time I've heard a reference to the serious business of the internet. I'm expecting to see him in a V mask chanting "never forget, never forgive" next :)

Yes, it has occurred to me that maybe Chris just wanted to mock Scientology without any internet input at all - after all we can all see it's not a religion and doesn't deserve any respect. Knowing that he games on the 360 though, he has to be at least in touch with people who are aware of the feelings of some message board users towards Scientology, and aware of the concept of anonymous.

Leading on from the increasing referencing of the internet, it's starting to look inevitable that the whole of entertainment will eventually be available mainly via one internet-based medium. I'm wondering if that'll lead to problems, such as conflicts over the very censorship to which the internet community is currently so averse? Family friendly stations like our own dear Radio 1 for example would surely want to be using a safe and family friendly medium.

UM is a nice place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually thought this was very poor, Moyles mocking Scientology and saying he wasn't going to watch a TV show because the star is a Scientologist. I know he is allowed to get away with it because the UK does not consider it a religion, but lots of people do and I felt it was a bit off to be honest.

And regarding internet censoship, people will mainly go to trusted sites, eg the BBC and just be aware that anything outside that may be age restricted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest CancerForTheCure

To be honest I don't see why he shouldn't be able to get away with it "even" if he was criticising Christianity, political correctness is a bit of a joke really.

Also, I love the way someone can just create a religion and suddenly there ae hundreds of followers. Has anyone read 'Scepticism Inc'? My boyfriend's favourite book, I'm glad he made me read it. People go a bit insane when it comes to religions, to be honest.

Believe it or not, I am a Christian.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually thought this was very poor, Moyles mocking Scientology and saying he wasn't going to watch a TV show because the star is a Scientologist.

Maybe but I have to say I have never looked at the show the same way since. Which from what I heard, was the point he was trying to make.

I caught My Name Is Earl for the first time in ages last night, and just couldn't look at Earl the same way. I didn't immediately think "Scientologist" but something made me think differently of him.

It was a weird feeling. I can't say I do the same with any other religion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scientology isn't a religion. It's not regarded as one in the UK anyway, and hopefully never will be. It makes far less sense than the cult of the Flying Spaghetti Monster and there are certain things about it which many people consider to be bordering on evil. Generally it is a way of making money out of people who probably really need counselling or even psychiatric help, instead of that help they are asked to pay for "auditing". The Science Fiction behind it would be laughed out of a cheap comic book. A spaceship that looked like a plane, a volcano and Thetans.

Regarding the other point, I suppose programs that protect children from "adult" content will sell very well if all entertainment ends up on the internet. Any child of 10 or thereabouts should be able to hack such a program though, as it's still true that in general young people know far more about being a user and how to find information, legal or not, than most adults do.

UM is a nice place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leading on from the increasing referencing of the internet, it's starting to look inevitable that the whole of entertainment will eventually be available mainly via one internet-based medium. I'm wondering if that'll lead to problems, such as conflicts over the very censorship to which the internet community is currently so averse? Family friendly stations like our own dear Radio 1 for example would surely want to be using a safe and family friendly medium.

I doubt that will happen for quite a while yet as not only does the UK's internet infrastucture lag behind many other countries but the vast majority of ISPs don't want to pay for the bandwidth such a service would use (the iplayer argument being a prime example).

There's also the fact that people still want a physical product at the end of the day) although dvds could go the way of cds I suppose. I like the fact that I am able to a tv programme hours after it has aired in america(lost, dexter etc) as I don't want to subscribe to sky.

Download the Adam and Joe & Jon Richardson podcasts now!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I caught My Name Is Earl for the first time in ages last night, and just couldn't look at Earl the same way. I didn't immediately think "Scientologist" but something made me think differently of him.

It was a weird feeling. I can't say I do the same with any other religion.

I get that when I find a person believes in gods. Tooth fairy, easter bunny, invisible friends and god, all the same thing to me, figments of the imagination.

'The light at the end of the tunnel was the light of an oncoming train'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if their deadly enemies are Thefaketans?

I'll get me coat...

:D that actually made me laugh out loud.

"In Scientology, a thetan is the term roughly corresponding to one's "soul", and a Body Thetan is an alien thetan who is 'stuck' in, on or near a human "meat body" because of activities of an ancient Space opera alien named Xenu of the Galactic Confederacy. All human bodies were said by L. Ron Hubbard to be covered in clusters of these misplaced thetans"

It's not really the most credible belief system now, is it?

Even so, no-one wants to ban silly or incredible beliefs, just to be allowed to openly oppose them and harmful actions which may stem from them.

I think the problem with bandwidth might temporarily slow the movement of all entertainment to the internet but better and better cable is being laid all the time, my ISP offers a 20mb no cap on downloads option already.

UM is a nice place

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually thought L. Ron Hubbard in creating Scientology was attempting to parody the nonsensical absurdities of the mainstream religions by devising something that seemed even more idiotic, sinister and incredible, that he had an amazing sense of humour and that, ultimately, he was attempting to suppose people are foolish enough to believe in anything, without question, if their contemporaries do...

But he was being serious. Deadly serious. Worse, he got people to believe it and accept it as truth :shock:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Weirdo worshippers of Science Fiction' Vs 'Bonkers believers in the Bible'

Whilst I obviously recognise that Scientology is some sort of closely guarded, pretty dodgy cult, based entirely on the most tenuous and to be frank, pretty crap Science Fiction stories, I can't help thinking that this is what religion is about in general.

There are many people in the world who choose to take their personal religion's stories seriously, often even literally. George Bush is for example an Evangelical Christian; which means he quite literally believes in the stories Adam and Eve, Noah, Jesus and any other nonsense you can think of from The Bible.

I have a problem with this, as I believe in morals and ethics rather than religion. I also don't approve of all of the secrecy when it comes to certain religions/cults etc.

Another thing I'm not too keen on is the fact that Scientology and Opus Dei (Roman Catholic) sects are recruiting some of the most wealthy/influential people in the world. Bet Posh 'n' Becks have already begun to attend the Church of Scientologists in downtown LA!.;)

I have my own system of beliefs. It's as simple as that.

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Since Easter at the beginning of April, Vick, Katie and Jamie have been on together just 4 times. Which is crazy for a brand new, high profile Radio 1 show. Imagine Jordan being off that regularly on Capital because of ‘other commitments’ - would never happen.  Jamie has only presented 6 times in the past month. Katie has presented every single show. Given how she got the job at the last minute I think very likely she would have had other commitments, which she will have cancelled/rearranged, cos being Radio 1 drive time host is a massive gig.   Vick, Katie and Jamie - 4 times; Vick and Katie - 10 times; Katie and Jamie - 2 times; Katie and Lauren - 2 times. 
    • I see Katie (and Mairead) were out with Jordan tonight.  I don’t listen to the show any longer, I am shocked they are allowed to mention Jordan.
    • At least I do not ask stupid questions…😂
    • I suggest you follow the other DJs too if so, you will learn the hardest working will go further 🤣
    • A simple check on his instagram would answer all your questions , he’s on tour with his wife and the team behind his podcast. I suggest anyone to follow the radio presenters, you will learn a lot about their other jobs and work commitments. 
    • Where is Jamie? It felt like he was settling in when Vick wasn’t on but he’s not been on since last Tuesday now. They’ve not even mentioned him, in fact they’ve mentioned Jordan more than they’ve mentioned him in the last two days.
    • Scott's show is on the road next week, live from Malmö in Sweden on Wednesday and Friday, ahead of Eurovision. As he's doing the semi final coverage on the TV on Tuesday and Thursday alongside Rylan, Gary Davies sits in for him on those days.
    • I don't feel there's so much overlap between M&M and Scott's shows. M&M is of a similar calibre to Scott & Chris on R1, with genuine laugh out loud moments and usually a show packed full of real interesting content. Scott's R2 show is IMO a shadow of the stuff he did on R1 (not his fault, he's doing exactly what station management want), with music and content to appeal to a much older audience.
    • To be fair, Scott & Chris would've still been fine on Radio 1. It was mentioned at the time that Scott's move was very much on Radio 2's part rather than Radio 1 wanting to move them on. That's the one problem that Radio 2 has, trying to appeal to such a wide demographic.. it's the perfect listen for many, but equally a turn off for many others. I think they have the balance fairly right.     
    • I agree Scott has always been a good standalone presenter, but always better when with someone. When chappers left the radio one show it felt a different show and Chris joining was what it needed and brought new life. for the format of the radio 2 show Scott’s show fits well with the station but again, there’s the huge gap between radio1 and 2 As been said already old radio2 listeners feel it now feels too young with latest changes, yet old radio1 listeners still feel radio 2 feels too old. The inbetween stage demographic of too old for radio 1 but too young for radio 2 is still not catered for radio 2 was left to grow old with its audience for too long and to change things up now feels to try and change a brand image the right thing to do is leave it as it is and cater for that 1.5 demographic which I’m sure the new proposed 00s and 10s station will do if approved. Problem is it’s so overdue that by the time it gets off the ground these listeners are already likely to be lost and the changing image of radio2 likely to lose what it stands for as a brand with the “it’s too young now “  moving to boom and the “ it still sounds old “ crowd not able to move with their favourite presenters like Scott so finding themself on capital a radio 1.5 would have been perfect for Scott and Chris, seems unlikely but this is why I think who branding of bbc radio needs a rethink if these new stations get off ground
    • Bank Holiday Monday Schedule 6am-10am: Arielle Free in for Greg 10am-2pm: Dean & Vicky (No Rickie, Melvin & Charlie) 2pm-6pm: Vick & Jamie (No Katie) 6pm onwards: As normal.
    • Dare I say they've sounded great this past week?  Very much gelling.  Maybe less pressure?  Seem to be having a genuinely good time and not forcing things.
    • I'm in the minority in my workplace, most of them love country music.  Me, the American, does not care for it.  That said, I haven't haaaaaated some of the country adjacent stuff that's been on the R1 playlist.  
    • The Eurovision semi finals are on from 8 to 10pm on Tuesday 7th and Thursday 9th May with Richie Anderson. That means Sara Cox in on till 8 on those days.  Saturday 11th May is Eurovision 'Super Saturday... 1-3pm Your Ultimate Abba song with Gary Davies  3-6pm Michelle Visage's Eurovision All Stars 6-8pm Eurovision Request Party with Owain Wynn Evans 8pm Eurovision Grand Final with Scott Mills and Rylan Clark  
×
×
  • Create New...