Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Product Placement Could Happen on UK TV by the end of the year...


MrDoovdeHaxorz

Recommended Posts

TV Producers Eye Product Placement Deals

2:36pm UK, Monday June 28, 2010

Hazel Tyldesley, Sky News Online

Branded products could appear in television shows under advertising deals by the end of the year, the broadcasting watchdog has said.

15501548.gif Former American Idol judge Simon Cowell seen with a Coca-Cola branded cup

Ofcom has published proposals to allow British TV stations to carry out the practice, known as product placement, in a loosening of regulations.

Product placement is common in the US, where Hewlett-Packard printers appear in the American version of The Office and the judges on American Idol drink from giant Coca-Cola branded cups.

It is currently not permitted here, but earlier this year the Labour government announced it was lifting the ban on product placement in films, TV series, entertainment shows and sports programmes.

It remains banned in all children's and news programmes and in UK-produced current affairs, consumer affairs and religious programmes.

In addition, tobacco, alcohol, gambling, foods or drinks that are high in fat, salt or sugar, medicines and baby milk can not feature in product placement advertising.

<cut></cut>

15656021.jpg An example product placement logo

Under Ofcom's new proposals, TV stations will be able to use the advertising method as long as they make clear to viewers it is happening through use of an on-air symbol.

In a news release explaining the changes, the regulator said advertisers would not be able to pay to influence storylines or otherwise compromise broadcasters' editorial independence

"A broadcaster could not, for instance, accept payment from an insurance company to feature a storyline about a house burning down and the homeowner not being insured," it said.

Separate proposals have been published by Ofcom regarding commercial references on radio.

The watchdog said both sets of guidelines would be revised after consultation and issued at the end of 2010 in Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code, the rulebook for the broadcasting industry.

Not so sure this is a GOOD thing for UK TV really. On the one hand, it beats them having to cover up or use creative camera angles to obscure brand names, on the other, I don't see why they have to show an onscreen logo to show it's happening (it'll probably be pretty obvious anyways) it could end up ridiculous here, a bit like that scene from Wayne's World;

fBjK_oavReU

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw about this on The Wright Stuff this morn. That logo appearing all the time would be quite annoying, unless they put it at the start of the programme, and it's not exactly necessary.

As Nihal said, unless they start changing plot lines and unnaturally shoving brand names everywhere, it should be okay.

Ohai.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Nihal said, unless they start changing plot lines and unnaturally shoving brand names everywhere, it should be okay.

I agree, I don't think any of us will notice it. It will seem far more natural, for example someone eating a bag of Walkers crisps on Coronation Street than a white bag of "select crips" which just looks odd. Likewise on something like Big Brother when someone is drinking a can of larger, what looks more natural? A can of larger with a Stella logo or a peice of gaffter tape randomly stuck on the can. It will be fine, it's a logical step to make money it harsh financial times.

ChrisHewgill.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sadly I think it will also end up funding stuff like X-Factor and perpetuating that.

Personal opinions of individual shows aside, I think that yes as long as it's not overdone as per the Wayne's World (PARODY, incase anyone hasn't seen it and/or needs that pointing out) clip above, there shouldn't be a problem. Still don't think the logo drawing attention to it happening is necessary though, it's not like it's going to be subliminal.

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

adverts are annoying & crap, when will they realise that they don't work !

i don't watch or listen to any adverts, however on occasion when do have the ,misfortune to hear or watch one, if its in anyway annoying, irrelevant, up their own arse, or just plain crap i will make a point of not buying the product they are selling & as for internet stuff that advertise on tv/radio never in a million years will i visit their site, if their site is SO dam good they wouldn't need to advertise, like them comparison sites who take your info & flog it on for years to come.

as for product placement, make no difference to me, don't watch any of the soaps nor programs that will have placement.

tv is just going to end up like this, shit

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Inscky6EyQ8&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Inscky6EyQ8&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

its a great movie, & concept, but watching a actual show like that :wacky:

:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Nat in for Dean with Vicky as well that day.
    • So the end of weekend afternoons this week - new show is July 1st.
    • Arielle is in for Greg on Monday 27th May.
    • He’s definitely gotten better and the show has sounded fine this week. I think it been at its best when it’s been Katie and Jamie or Vick and Katie. Vick and Jamie are ok together, but I do think the show sounds better when it’s Vick and Katie and therefore I still don’t really understand the point of the trio.    Jamie is, however, a lot better than Danny Beard! 
    • The RAJAR coming on later this year reflecting later summer to autumn will be interesting to how it reflects Matt and Mollie in afternoons to the revised changes on radio 1’s new music slots and the schedule re-shuffling Radio 3 introducing a new slate of programmes. Then, later on this year have speech radio stations having domestic political coverage of the election but also America’s presidential election.  
    • I actually caught snippets of today’s show, and I found it much better than the last time I listened. I have made it no secret that I like Jamie on the radio, I was surprised by how much I enjoyed Matt & him together last year. People have criticised him for not being relatable, but I have to agree with the comment above that I have always found him a naturally warm person to listen to. Maybe the going home set up was something that needed settling in and things are starting to take shape.  It must have been difficult for him joining an established duo in Vick & Katie to begin with.  Jamie was great on something songs today, fully engaged in the caller and sounded like a real presenter. Maybe he is doing as a lot of us hoped and really learning as he goes, how to do it properly. 
    • Agree with this. The anti-Jamie feeling was IMO quite influenced by the negativity around him replacing Jordan, since Jordan was exceptional and also universally loved. When people mention Danny and Jamie in the same sentence about bad hiring decisions I almost choke - Jamie may not be perfect but he's several leagues better than Danny already and has bags of potential. Danny is poor and has shown zero potential...
    • Jamie started 4 March, and the figures only going up to 31 March, so it isn't reliable. But it has shown the numbers have dropped in afternoons compared to last quarter. It looks like it's Capital's gain.
    • Do these audience figures reflect Jordan leaving and Jamie replacing him?
    • I think Jamie is really starting to settle into the role well. He comes across as really warm, and genuinely invested in the listeners when he’s talking to them which is nice. I think he’s building a really great relationship with Vicki and Katie too. His recent great company podcast is great too, where he has quite a deep chat with someone new each week. He’s clearly a very genuine person and I think he has some real potential.
    • Most probably. But do wonder what the future of the relax themed programmes will be when they officially wind down that service.
    • I think it's just to replace Wind Down presents... which was in that timeslot, and I'm guessing Chillout Anthems was just a buffer since it'll still be played at 06:00 on Sundays.
    • With listening on the U.K. for the industry in general it is good overall as most stations reach is on the up and shows radio to be more sustainable and stable outlet than linear televisions channels. This RAJAR I think with the increase shift to DAB+ the BBC will be able to say it has it’s audiences for the proposed new stations it wishes to launch and think the new innovative ideas that it seems Jack himself can take credit for on the new music show think the younger under 30 gen z demographic could increase se in that time-slot. 
    • Conor Knight is in for Sam & Danni on Saturday 8th & Sunday 9th June. It's Radio 1 at Parklife, 13.00-16.00 on Saturday 8th & Sunday 9th June. Matt & Mollie are in for Greg from Monday 10th to Friday 14th June - it's just Matt on the Thursday. It's Radio 1 at Download, 13.00-16.00 on Friday 14th June.
    • Rajar looking healthy this quarter, with the numbers staying fairly stable. 
×
×
  • Create New...