Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Ben Cooper in today's Guardian


Jono

Recommended Posts

Ben Cooper is in the Guardian today talking about ratings, the possible BBC Three and Radio 1 merger, and his plan to offer a Netflix style radio service.

It's quite a comprehensive interview, mostly he's on the defense.

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/oct/03/ben-cooper-radio-1-up-against-minecraft-young-audiences

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read this and the comments. Radio 1 really needs a rethink from the top down. 

For starters, I'm sorry, but look at Ben Cooper's age. They need to start by hiring a young, energetic controller. Then they need to make their station attractive and decide WHO is going to listen. Weekends sound like they're tailored to a 10 year old, weekday mornings sound like they're aimed at 13 year olds, Clara's show is aimed at nobody in particular and weekdays sound more like they're aimed at 25 year olds. 

Then, they need to figure out what "the kids" like. I don't think many of their TA are turning OFF R1 in favour of their iPad or "Minecraft" (WHOOOOOO?!) otherwise we'd also see ratings drop across the board for Capital, Capital XTRA, KISS and the BAUER Three network. But we're not. 

So the final step is to realise they're doing it somewhat wrong. They need to work on their branding and marketing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the issue I have with Radio 1 is the desire to bring down the listening age so much. I don't see why Radio 1 shouldn't be appealing to listeners aged 25+ when the official remit is 16-29. Radio 2 serves those 35+, so what about us in the 25-35 category?

Also it's all very well saying that RAJARs don't mean much and that YouTube views are so important, but the clue is in the name - Radio 1. Radio first, everything else should be second. RAJARs not including listeners under 15 is irrelevant - they aren't in the remit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/10/2016 at 5:29 PM, Ant L said:

RAJARs not including listeners under 15 is irrelevant - they aren't in the remit.

Absolutely spot on - and besides, the remit is from 16-29, so you could argue, why should they be included? 

Does feel like they're doing everything to avoid the blame actually being with themselves rather than the listeners. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's put this in perspective of a coffee shop. 

If you suddenly saw a significant proportion of your customers not returning, but seeing little change in other coffee shops in the area - would you lay the blame on somewhat irrelevant factors (the internet, the weather, the "way people consume" coffee)? 

No. If you knew anything about business, you'd adapt your business because you'd notice that you had less customers. 

Ben Cooper, think it's time you did the same!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/05/2016 at 5:29 PM, Ant L said:

I think the issue I have with Radio 1 is the desire to bring down the listening age so much. I don't see why Radio 1 shouldn't be appealing to listeners aged 25+ when the official remit is 16-29. Radio 2 serves those 35+, so what about us in the 25-35 category?

Radio 1 minus Scott's show, hasn't appaealed to me on the whole since 2004 really. I was 16 years old then. It's been happening for a long time now, and as a 28 year old I hardly give the station the time of day now.

 

Radio 2's problem is that the start of their age range is much higher than 35. Apart from Simon Mayo, who I do listen to from time to time due to the fact he's a great broadcaster and I recall him from the latter end of his Radio 1 days. The rest is unbearable. I find Vine annoying, Steve Wright stuck in the 80's and Ken Bruce stuck even earlier in the 70's. I've never been a big fan of Evans anyway so I guess that's out of my point.

 

Leaves people like me in no mans land, too old for Radio 1. Way too young to listen to Dr Hook on Radio 2.

on the grid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an old boy (really old!) I tend to drift between radio 1 and radio 6. Radio 2 I find painfully dull. I'm nearly 50 and from when I was 'radio 1 age' the music I was into was the tail end of punk into new wave and then IDM. Radio 2 seems to have bypassed all this and plays the aforementioned Dr Hook!
So I'm going to muck up the Radio 1 demographic and stick with it (at least while Scott and Greg are still on anyway).


Sent from my iPhone using the Unofficialmills.co.uk mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
    • Practically speaking, Riley & Coe on 6Music is the answer to that problem - but I get your overall point.
    • Yes and thats the huge selling point after 6pm as always has been in the evening. As when I started listening to radio 1 about eleven twelve years ago its the station that got me into music new and familiar artists and bands. I think the issue with a lot of the new music shows being crammed in length of the shows and not all is live there’s less chance for a presenter to tell you about the band or artist or have the impression of chatting to the listener by reading out texts and emails or including voice notes. I’m really enjoying Jack Saunders’ new music show as thats how you do a show like that on Radio 1 good mix of genres but from 10pm onwards you don’t have the presenter chatting to the listener or that live feel as sometimes you need at that time.
    • Given one of yesterday’s ‘bangers’ was Noah Kahan’s Stick Season, I doubt it.
    • No chart show on the 24th May because of Big Weekend.
    • How has it been working early mornings as a parent, Chris? Is it harder to juggle than the 1-4 slot?
    • I still think Dua Lipa could make the line-up. She's in the Live Lounge soon. Would be a scoop if they had two of the key Glastonbury performers.
    • Is the three bangers after nine idea meant to compete with Ten Minute Takeover? 
    • Connor Coates is in for Charlie Hedges on Saturday 18th May. Kerrie Cosh is in for Jess on Sunday 19th May.
×
×
  • Create New...