Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Blackberry vs iPhone


Guest

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons
Well, you do because the software isn't out until June...

And you'll need to pay for the iPod Touch OS4 upgrade, whereas the iPhone upgrade is free.

But you need to wait until June to get the brand new iPhone, anyway. There's a major hardware upgrade coming with improved camera, screen, battery, etc that is most likely getting announced at the big Apple event in June (and usually comes out soon after). With the new iPhone will probably come a new iPod Touch (which I also have, and it's immensely inferior to the iPhone) and everything else, so wait it out and get the new iPhone. If you can hold off until July, perfect.

The software on the... 3rd Gen? I think it is.. Can use OS4 though.

Pay for iPod touches??? WTF? How much? What? When? Why? Who? Where?

Yes, but, i want an iPod for music, not games and apps..... :P :p :P lol

Excuse me... I have my iPod purely for music. Apps & games are an added extra that I don't use a lot. Safari, YouTube, Facebook: Yeah, okay. But music means more to me than anything. You WILL be able to fit ALL your music onto a 64GB one defo, probs a 32GB.. How much music do you have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The software on the... 3rd Gen? I think it is.. Can use OS4 though.

Pay for iPod touches??? WTF? How much? What? When? Why? Who? Where?

I'm not following, so I'll say it again:

OS4 is not out yet. OS4 will be out when the new iPhone and possibly the new iPod Touch are out. Thus, if you're going to buy an iPod Touch, you might as well just buy an iPhone, get calls, texts, a camera and a built-in microphone, and not have to pay for the OS4 upgrade which you probably will have to do with an iPod Touch since you had to pay to upgrade the OS last time (about a fiver or something - was dirt cheap to be fair).

An iPod is cheaper and stores more music, but the get-around is just to buy a 16gb iPhone, stick 10gb of music you listen to regularly on there, swap it around every week or two to keep your playlist fresh, and download the Spotify app and cough up £10 a month to stream loads of music whenever and wherever.

I have both an iPod Touch and an iPhone, after years of having another mp3 player of a differing brand, and there is no comparison. I would be lost without my iPhone. Not having all 40gb of my music library is a small price for being able to surf Facebook, Twitter and Tumblr whilst playing Crystal Maze and listening to some Metallica on the bus.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The software on the... 3rd Gen? I think it is.. Can use OS4 though.

Pay for iPod touches??? WTF? How much? What? When? Why? Who? Where?

Excuse me... I have my iPod purely for music. Apps & games are an added extra that I don't use a lot. Safari, YouTube, Facebook: Yeah, okay. But music means more to me than anything. You WILL be able to fit ALL your music onto a 64GB one defo, probs a 32GB.. How much music do you have?

10, 000 songs.......... *feels like she's been spendig WAY too much time listenig to radio... :( *

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons
10, 000 songs.......... *feels like she's been spendig WAY too much time listenig to radio... :( *

I know the 8GB holds way over 1000 songs so.. I reckon you can get away with a 64GB iPod touch(:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the 8GB holds way over 1000 songs so.. I reckon you can get away with a 64GB iPod touch(:

Me and touch screens dont go well 2gether (huge perfectly manicured nails lol)... and i said 10000 not 1000..... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons
Me and touch screens dont go well 2gether (huge perfectly manicured nails lol)... and i said 10000 not 1000..... :)

Believe it or not.. I can read AND count. (;

With the iPod touch you don't use your nails like most phones, you actually use your finger and you can get a pen/stylus to use on it(: Are you going to buy an iPod touch or what then? iPod touch. iPod touch. iPod touch. iPod TOUCH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons
If you're getting a Touch, just get an iPhone instead. Absolutely no reason to not get an iPhone if you're getting a Touch.

Do you have an iPod touch?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe it or not.. I can read AND count. (;

With the iPod touch you don't use your nails like most phones, you actually use your finger and you can get a pen/stylus to use on it(: Are you going to buy an iPod touch or what then? iPod touch. iPod touch. iPod touch. iPod TOUCH!

No, dont u see? I hv really long nails and it scratches the screen! And im getting the classic... u did convince me, i asked mum for the touch but its too expensive and it turns out this whole thread is pointless cos Mum, aftwer months of saying i could get the iPhone/BlackBerry for my bday, has now said im just getting the classic and that is that because "you have to remember, ines, that i am a single unemployed mother with no qualifications and three children and i simply cnat afford it!!!" and blablabla etc. etc. .... :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons
No, dont u see? I hv really long nails and it scratches the screen! And im getting the classic... u did convince me, i asked mum for the touch but its too expensive and it turns out this whole thread is pointless cos Mum, aftwer months of saying i could get the iPhone/BlackBerry for my bday, has now said im just getting the classic and that is that because "you have to remember, ines, that i am a single unemployed mother with no qualifications and three children and i simply cnat afford it!!!" and blablabla etc. etc. .... :(

The classic is more expensive than the touch :L

But anyway, the iPhone won(:

Now you can help me: I'm wondering what to get for Christmas.. Laptop, iPhone or iPod..? Lol, dw(: Just hoping my mum doesn't dump her boyfriend before December, though.. Think I'll ask for the laptop..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The classic is more expensive than the touch :L

But anyway, the iPhone won(:

Now you can help me: I'm wondering what to get for Christmas.. Laptop, iPhone or iPod..? Lol, dw(: Just hoping my mum doesn't dump her boyfriend before December, though.. Think I'll ask for the laptop..

Its not more expensive than the 64gb one that i wanted.... :( anywayzz yeah go 4 the laptop cos the iPhone is literally just the touch with the added fact u can call and text and im assuming u already hav a fone nd iPOD so yeah go 4 laptop... :) im asking for a shopping spree in Topshop for xmas... ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a flaw in Mitchells reasoning though. It should read, get an iPhone rather than the iPod touch if you can afford the extra cost, or are able to get a decent contract. If not, the iPod touch is the way forward.

True. And besides the iPhone is kind of just the touch but with less music space and the ability to call and text... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons
Its not more expensive than the 64gb one that i wanted.... :( anywayzz yeah go 4 the laptop cos the iPhone is literally just the touch with the added fact u can call and text and im assuming u already hav a fone nd iPOD so yeah go 4 laptop... :) im asking for a shopping spree in Topshop for xmas... ;)

Yeah, maybe a red laptop... Hurmm..

My phone atm is pretty crap though..

Topshop? Ergh. Too expensive. Go for quantity rather that quality. Primark, New Look... If you want anything remotely expensive then Tammy or New Fashion. (:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, maybe a red laptop... Hurmm..

My phone atm is pretty crap though..

Topshop? Ergh. Too expensive. Go for quantity rather that quality. Primark, New Look... If you want anything remotely expensive then Tammy or New Fashion. (:

Yess i know Topshop is way too expensive... I was in there looking at Kate Moss's new line and the cheapest thing I found in stock was £45!! but yeah itll b Primark and the (massive) new look up in stirling which is a city near me with amazing shops... and lol wht is New Fashion? is it english? i live in scotland..... :P lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons
Yess i know Topshop is way too expensive... I was in there looking at Kate Moss's new line and the cheapest thing I found in stock was £45!! but yeah itll b Primark and the (massive) new look up in stirling which is a city near me with amazing shops... and lol wht is New Fashion? is it english? i live in scotland..... :P lol

New Fashion? JR Fashion? I don't know actually... But it is really just disco clothing.. Plus they listen to Radio 1, so I love it(:

btw.. I'm half Scottish! Woo(:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New Fashion? JR Fashion? I don't know actually... But it is really just disco clothing.. Plus they listen to Radio 1, so I love it(:

btw.. I'm half Scottish! Woo(:

Oh.... and im not really scottish... im Portuguese lol..... hence the name. Just live here lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest PineapplesLikeAarons
Oh.... and im not really scottish... im Portuguese lol..... hence the name. Just live here lol...

I know. *sigh* You have said that a few times before...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have an iPod touch?

Yes. I don't use it any more, though. I only use my iPhone.

There is a flaw in Mitchells reasoning though. It should read, get an iPhone rather than the iPod touch if you can afford the extra cost, or are able to get a decent contract. If not, the iPod touch is the way forward.

Money is a weak-ass excuse. I'm flat broke and I'm still paying the £30 a month (and that's all you need - I don't use my texts because I use Twitter, Facebook, MSN and e-mail instead, and there's loads of apps for free texting if needed).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mitchell, not everyone CAN get a contract. And PAYG is for the extremely rich or extremely stupid. Money can't all go on one item, and when your flat broke it gets harder and harder. I have missed bills this Month, so it's not all candy and lollipops. And certainly not a weak-ass excuse.

Nik B.

Born to Toads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do I really need to signpost my posts for people? I've been here long enough that we should be past this.

Wouldn't mind, but my initial post wasn't even aimed at you. Thus, this is a problem entirely on your part. Not mine. I have no sympathy if you're taking my posts seriously.

Maybe you need a warning in your sig like I have :evil:

Professional eater of puppy dogs, baby heads and killer of grannies...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Similar to SZA’s Kill Bill, the word “kill” had been initially cut out of Taylor Swift’s Fortnight. But it seems like they are now playing an unedited version.
    • Also hopefully won't get my head bitten off for this but I'd say of the current Radio 1 DJs the one arguably most similar to Scott Mills's latter time on Radio 1 would be Mollie. I'm not saying she's as good as Scott was to be clear but she is that sort of vibe. 'Future Pop' is exactly the sort of music Scott would be championing and you can tell Mollie has the same passion for it that Scott did. There's that Party Anthems link too - a show Matt & Mol do that previously Scott did and they bring a similar energy to how Scott did that makes it a fun listen. Matt & Mollie seem to just have that natural connection with the listeners that Scott & Chris did that you can't manufacture.
    • I find at the minute I'm a bit of a nomad when it comes to radio stations. Often the Radio 1 playlist really doesn't appeal to me these days and I did wonder is it just me tiring of new music but then I'll listen to Future Pop and Party Anthems and there's loads of tunes on there that I love and they're excellent listens but just too few of those make it to the playlist. Radio 2 may arguably be more to my taste music wise but also often feels too rooted on the past. Plus much of the content just doesn't appeal to me and verges on the 'mumsy' side. Plus Radio 2's new music can feel very 'middle of the road' - just because I don't enjoy some of the Radio 1 new stuff it doesn't mean I want Take That & Will Young as 'new music'. For me currently if I'm tuning in for radio it'll be Jordan North on Capital Breakfast, on Radio 1 Matt & Mollie, (if Jamie is off)  Going Home and Sam & Danni plus there's also Capital Dance and Mistajam. They all hit the mark for me in a way other shows don't.
    • Matt & Mol for me. For those that enjoyed Scott's Radio 1 show, Matt & Mollie are the natural successors (even more so than Scott's Radio 2 show) - two best mates doing a fun show packed full of content For one thing Matt & Mol inherited two of Scott's ex producers in Amy & Helena. Some Matt & Mollie features you could easily imagine Scott doing e.g. Matt vs Mollie and some feel near identical (can see 'Battletracks' taking the old 'Bangers' slot as it feels heavily based on that feature). Also while this may be down to being a weekend show Matt & Mol's show does seem to lean in a more pop direction and seems to deviate from the playlist more than some other shows- which helps as the Radio 1 playlist can be quite marmite and get samey very quickly. Something just doesn't hit the mark for me with Scott on Radio 2. It feels like it's aimed at somebody about a decade older than me and relies heavily on Noughties nostalgia. Scott too I feel works best with somebody else to work off and is missing that fun element he had with Chris and previously Chappers. It's fine but not something I'll go out my way to listen to.  
    • Random idea time: condense all the throwback shows into one three hour show from 10am to 1pm on a Saturday, get Katie Thistleton back to host it (as Charlie does with Dance Anthems on a Saturday), call it “Radio 1’s Bottomless Brunch with Katie Thistleton” and just have 3 hours of throwbacks from across the decades, not just 00s or 10s, just a mix of everything. The occasional 90s anthem, tunes from the early 2020s, just 3 hours of pure feel good
    • I think it's great the amount of choice out there right now. I could happily listen to Greg or Jordan in the morning, Going Home or Huw Stephens in the evening, or Scott and Matt and Mollie in afternoons.  Still a few times when I'm channel hopping but maybe that's healthy to check out what's around.  As that research pointed out, Scott is good for minimal distractions. If you want some chaos I dare say it'll be Matt and Mollie offering that.  Plenty of my friends say it's the Radio 1 playlist that puts them off, even if they like the DJs. So Radio 2 is more preferable. 
    • I quite quickly gave up on Scott’s show on R2 as I realised it wasn’t my kind of vibe. I do listen to the Scott Mills weekly to catch up, because I still think Scott is great, but there is just something missing (for example, he played out some clips recently of the old sleep recording app from the R1 days, and didn’t play ‘go and open the window Garry’ - or if he did, it didn’t make it to the podcast.) I don’t see them changing it now or making it any ‘younger’ than it is.   Matt & Mollie in the afternoon is something that I’m really looking forward to. They are such an interesting and funny listen. It has given me a different dilemma though, as 1pm has been the perfect time for me to catch up on the Capital breakfast show and takes me perfectly to the end of my working day, so now I’ll probably have to forego listening to that and stick with R1 for Matt & Mollie. These shows need podcasts because it’s already giving me fomo. 
    • Even for the older Radio 1 listeners (of which there are still quite a few) Scott’s show doesn’t feel quite right.  (That’s nothing on Scott who sounds good but more the station sound and content). Since moving to Capital Breakfast I haven’t been listening to much Radio 1.  I always found the shows outside of Breakfast and Drive more wallpaper due to my working day and the show content of RMC and Dean and Vicky so Capital is just background noise to me after enjoying Breakfast.
    • I love Scott but if you're a 20 or 30 something that enjoyed his last few years of Radio 1 the Radio 2 show just doesn't translate. Stars from Neighbours or 90s singers just aren't my cup of tea and I can't get enthused about some has been at Radio 2 in the Park or some country music countdown.  Until that changes I will probably more likely listen to Matt and Mollie.  The Steve Wright fans think Radio 2 has turned into Radio 1 but it has a long way to go to win over the older R1 audience. 
    • Radio 2 brought in Scott to bring the afternoon audience age down, but I feel with Matt and Mollie replacing Dean and Vicky they're going to be competing for a similar audience. Will Scott's show evolve to bring in more listeners or do you think they will be comfortable with the audience they currently have?
    • Yes I'm the same with 6Music. Huw Stephens offers something different. 
    • They are an answer. I do listen to 6 Music quite a bit but kind of feel like it isn’t for me unlike the New Music Fix Daily, Huw Stephens who I’d happily listen to. Think it’s a generational thing and music preference. But it’s like how 1 Xtra cut down Snoochie Shy’s nightly show to just Monday and with Wednesday and Thursday with just playlist programme. I just miss the days of having more choice of that time of night.
    • Practically speaking, Riley & Coe on 6Music is the answer to that problem - but I get your overall point.
    • Yes and thats the huge selling point after 6pm as always has been in the evening. As when I started listening to radio 1 about eleven twelve years ago its the station that got me into music new and familiar artists and bands. I think the issue with a lot of the new music shows being crammed in length of the shows and not all is live there’s less chance for a presenter to tell you about the band or artist or have the impression of chatting to the listener by reading out texts and emails or including voice notes. I’m really enjoying Jack Saunders’ new music show as thats how you do a show like that on Radio 1 good mix of genres but from 10pm onwards you don’t have the presenter chatting to the listener or that live feel as sometimes you need at that time.
    • Given one of yesterday’s ‘bangers’ was Noah Kahan’s Stick Season, I doubt it.
×
×
  • Create New...