Nobody could agree what the recording said
The internet had a new argument.
A short audio clip appeared to say either “Yanny” or “Laurel”.
Scott and Chris played it on Breakfast and immediately discovered that people in the same room were hearing different words.
Some listeners could not understand how anybody heard anything except Laurel.
Others were just as certain it said Yanny.
The disagreement felt like the audio equivalent of the famous dress photograph which people had seen as different colours.
Changing the sound changed the answer
Scott began experimenting.
The recording was slowed down and sped up.
Different versions seemed to emphasise different frequencies, making listeners switch from one word to the other or hear completely new sounds.
The more the team manipulated it, the less stable the original answer seemed.
Scott liked the fact that there was no need to build a complicated radio feature around it.
The same tiny clip could be played repeatedly and still produce an argument.
Messages came in from workplaces and families where people had effectively divided into Yanny and Laurel camps.
GCSE revision came to Radio 1
The Breakfast Show was also hearing from listeners preparing for GCSEs.
Scott initially treated PE as though the exam might simply involve being good at sport.
Emma explained that the subject included genuine theory and human biology, including questions about antagonistic muscle pairs.
The programme then tried to become revision support.
A biology question about carrots asked why their mass did not increase in the expected way after boiling.
The explanation involved heat damaging cell membranes and changing the way water moved through the cells.
Scott and Chris were suddenly discussing osmosis on Radio 1.
They also discovered Miley Cyrus’s old “Bone Dance” from *Hannah Montana*, a song designed to teach parts of the skeleton.
Scott decided that if pop culture could help listeners remember biology, there was no reason not to use it.
Which celebrity could you actually date?
Another conversation asked people to identify the celebrity they could realistically imagine dating.
The key word was realistic.
This was not permission simply to choose the most attractive famous person in the world.
Scott wanted somebody who might plausibly exist in the listener’s social orbit if circumstances were different.
Producer Sophie suggested Tom Holland.
That still felt ambitious, but at least followed the spirit of the game better than simply naming Ryan Gosling.
The show spent the morning asking people to judge their own celebrity “level” while simultaneously proving that they could not even agree on a two-syllable recording.
COMMENTS