Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

Overweight should be protected?


KingTutsWWH

Recommended Posts

If obesity is comparable to race, age, and religion in terms of discrimination, then we might as well add people who wear glasses, ginger haired people, clever people, less-intelligent people, and all the other school playground taunts to that list too. Hell, why not just all shut ourselves away in isolation and never speak or see anyone ever again.

*sigh*

>> I'm on here every now and again... <<

http://www.offthechartradio.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get why people have a problem with ginger-haired people. I don't think it's right that people should be able to shout at me in the street because of my hair colour.

I don't think it's right at all for people to be beaten up or taunted by complete strangers for any reason. Forcing businesses to provide special seats for fat people wouldn't exactly stop that kind of thing though, it would just make the obese people even more conspicuous and single them out for abuse. Doctors should be able to talk to people about aspects of their health without being accused of victimising them. Obesity isn't necessarily a conscious choice but it isn't always that easy to lose the weight.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be any bmi above 25.1

Also i heard that schools would have to find students bmi's and write a letter home giving options such as training or a six week crash course to stop them becoming obese. Which is the most ridiculous policy ever as people can have other underlying problems such a diabetes which invariably leads to weight gain.

etheridge_tom.png
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as any 'substance abuse' (whether it be nicotine, alcohol or food in this case) causes an extra burden on the NHS; it is surely the absolute right and duty of a doctor to be able to recommend a reduction in consumption before (or as part of) treatment. Stopping a doctor from being able to talk about someone's weight is akin to barring them from asking about their smoking or drinking habits... Ridiculous.

The simple fact is that singling anyone out for their slightly different appearance is just plain wrong, and a change in law isn't the right way to go about improving matters. Much better that people be taught how to respect others, regardless of their physical attributes...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And its pretty much your fault if your fat.

Not in all cases. Some people are large purely down to illnesses, etc. For example, if some people are wheelchair bound and can't get out to exercise, that's not their fault. They're too large to exercise, but they can't exercise because they're too large.

I think if people are "fat" due to an illness or disability, then yes, it could be deemed as a "hate crime". In that case I would put it as being similar to racism, in the way that that's just the way the person is.

On the other hand, if people are only fat just because they do no exercise whatsoever, eat all of the junk food they can lay their hands on and care nothing about their well being, and they happen to be subjected to this "hate crime", I think that pretty much is their fault. I'm not saying they deserve the abuse, but it's in fairly different circumstances to my first paragraph.

Alouette...deployer les ailes;

Alouette...plumerai les ailes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And its pretty much your fault if your fat.

I take offence to that. I'm large, and working my arse off (literally) to shift my excess weight. Its there in the first place because I had a crappy childhood, was overfed when I was young, and had a dodgy metabolism. So no. Not my fault. You can't generalise like that, it makes you look ignorant.

Nik B.

Born to Toads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd agree that it's not fair to assume it's someone's fault if they're overweight. It's not right to tiptoe around the issue so as not to offend people, it should be possible to make the observation and discuss someone's weight in a constructive manner without breaching their human rights. There is a significant group of people who are overweight/obese but are in denial and do not recognise the problem, and these people could benefit from medical advice and help before their weight problem gets any worse. I do not agree that anyone deserves abuse though.

My mother and sister are both rather overweight. Both of them are too ill to exercise it off so are somewhat resigned/depressed and comfort eat. I think there are some complex physical and psychological issues related to weight which can make it very difficult for obese people to simply eat less and exercise more. The earlier intervention happens however, the easier they're likely to find it to change their lifestyle and get to a healthier weight.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Even if you don't get insulted, the meaningless jokes hurt. And nobody even thinks you're hurting because you're not 'hugely obese'. I don't think it's possible to get rid of it, but if someone wants to try, I think they should.

I kinda understand. You can either accept it, fight it, or go mental. Sometimes I opt for the latter.

OMASM. Radio presenters are like fruit. Matt is my kumquat and Scott is blatantly my orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • Now in it's third week, the new Capital Breakfast Show seems to be settling down well and there are more of the informal, random Jordan topics appearing.  Though it is clear he wants to be seen slightly differently. It really is a very decent listen.
    • Just Vick and Katie on Wednesday (and presumably Thursday as well).
    • Unless people can provide a source for this information then it should be treated as false.   Why would Jordan sign a contract with the BBC in the autumn when he agreed a deal with Global?  He could have left in August and not had to deal with the BBC.  Vick who doesn't really like Global why would she recommend him to go there and then warn him in her post to be careful?   It's been whispered from October that Roman was thinking of going.  Roman and Jordan have the same management team.  Why would they put Jordan in a place where he would have to battle with the BBC.  They could have agreed a deal with Global for Jordan in the summer.  They might have had to pay first couple months but they would do they to secure him.  If they had known about Roman wanting to leave they could have paid Roman off to get Jordan on air quicker.  Global would also not had legal around BBC contract to deal with and would not have had to pay the BBC to release Jordan.  None of what people say makes sense and if it did happen the way people say then BBC are not the stupid ones.  It really is not a good look to be talking with Global for 6 months, to then sign a contract with a the BBC, continue to talk to Global behind BBC's back after signing and then couple of months later want to leave and to throw a hissy fit as the BBC are not giving you what you want when you want it. That not a good light for Jordan or his management.   
    • Wow, surprised he signed a new contract in September but it says a lot about Jordan that he continued to a very high standard throughout last summer/autumn if this was all going on in the background. 
    • They knew Roman wanted to leave early last year but wasn't officially announced but he gave them time to sort replacement. Found and offered Jordan a deal in June or July and needed time to get Jordan out of Contract at bbc and roman to do notice  Jordan had dinner with Katie Vick and Arielle to ask advice and all said he should go.   
    • And they told Radio 4’s Feedback that it was an ‘experiment’ to ‘look at the best way to serve young listeners’ but reaffirmed that 280 hours commitment.
    • I doubt he wanted to go to Global if a slot before he found out kemp was leaving.
    • We're hoping to get some answers in the coming weeks
    • From what he's saying on the Pod he's been trying to get out of r1 for a while. Looks like he needed to wait for a show on global to be available. Jordan had bbq last summer with most of thr global execs and he's referenced the deal was in place then. Obviously the hold up was r1 being stubborn
    • All seems to be back to normal this morning.
    • Indeed and Jordan was already friends with Sian Welby, Will Manning and Jimmy Hill.  
    • It's great to see those friendships still thriving. I think the days of Radio 1 DJs and Capital DJs being unable to co-exist is long over. You used to either be firmly BBC or commercial, and you don't get the sense that's the case anymore. 
    • Maia Beth will be presenting the Radio 1 Happy shows from the 27th April replacing Katie.  https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m001ydkr
    • Vick and Jordan together on Insta (with Ariel’s) in Ibiza. You do imagine Jordan’s ex colleagues have a very different attitude to him than management. Comments on Help! And very subtle comments on Capital Breakfast suggest Jordan was frustrated with Radio 1 / BBC management.  
    • I can name quite a few people on this forum who would be better presenters than Danny.
×
×
  • Create New...