Jump to content
Unofficial Mills

'Do you want fries with that 'A' level certificate?


KingTutsWWH

Recommended Posts

http://education.guardian.co.uk/alevels/story/0,,2248095,00.html

The Associated Board of McDonalds Adjudicators

Gordon Brown has seen fit to let Mackie Ds hand out GCSE/A level standard awards for fast food service.

'This employee has excelled in the field of doling out of greasy, unhealthy, environmetally unfriendly crap in a box in under 5 minutes to the customer - give him an 'A''.

Makes me wonder if any of our hard won GCSE/A level results are worth the paper/ paper bag they are printed on?

I was under the impression that Government policy generally discouraged the consumption/promotion of stuff that is very bad for you???

On you go Gordon! Go, get that deep fried Mars Bar down you!

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The McQualification will be treated as a joke by outside employers, regardless of its equivalent worth to A-levels.

Universities too (especially the top-level Universities) will likely dismiss it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's lots of qualifications which are pointless. I'm not sure they'll ever be taken in the same standing as a good old-fashioned A level (or A2 level these days). I suppose it's nice that they're making a token effort to give people qualifications, but they're no use unless they have a value.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno, anyone who can get a talentless group of semi evolved neaderthals to prepare food and react in a pavlovian way to various beeps and alarms and repeat simple phrases has to be doing something right I guess..

Honestly the MacD's in London seem more like the UN these days. They even have pictures on the tills so reading is not a requirement.

Sometimes here, sometimes not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a friend who works in McDonalds. It's a horrible place, the food repulses me and the decoration and the clown scare me.

Still, I suppose at least this way, Gordon Brown doesn't have to cough up funds himself, and McDonalds gain another corporate social responsibility brownie point.

'Forget happiness I'm fine, I'll forget everything in time'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a horrible place, the food repulses me and the decoration and the clown scare me.

You know that the colours red and yellow are used by corporations to stimulate parts of the brain, which make people hungry, eat quickly and get out of the 'restaurant' FAST.

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One principle is it makes those who are doing A-levels feel like they're doing them in vain if you can just go and get a job at McDonalds and end-up with an A-level qualification(s).

Another is the lazy and crap government we have taking the easy option out of trying to increase a skilled workforce, when all they need to do is make education free at the point of use for everyone, regardless of age, paid for out of the pockets of the wealthiest companies and individuals. But that looks too much like socialism, so they'll avoid it at all costs. Socialism = bad, capitalism = good.

Third, it involves private companies creeping into the education system, which is still, largely, under state control. City Academies (which should be demolished) are funded partly by wealthy individuals (they put up around £2m, the government provides £20m) but the agreement is the individual with the money gets to decide the academies ethos, which, frankly, disgusts me as it means a religious nut can come along and effectively decide the curriculum of the City Academy they are head of. It's this sort of private-state mixing, where the former effectively gets the best deal, which is what's most rotten about New ****ing Labour. The interests and well-being of capitalists (philanthropists if you're a Tory) come before everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope, not getting the problem. People who get a job at McDonalds instead of doing A levels are probably less likely to be able to do A levels to start with because school or 6th form doesn't suit them. So if they can get a qualification that'll enable them to get a better job managing something somewhere then good luck to them.

There/ They're/ Their. Different words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if they can get a qualification that'll enable them to get a better job managing something somewhere then good luck to them.

But that's mostly what the argument is about...how effective will a Mickey Mouse A-level be in gaining employment outside of McDonalds, when your rivals for the same job will have genuine A-levels and far greater potential as an employee? How many people will a youth who's got a McDonalds qualification have to beat before he gets a better job outside of McDonalds?

We need more plumbers, electricians, brick layers, roofers...the incentive should be trying to get unskilled school leavers, who are likely to be working in McDonalds, into non-academic professions with good prospects at no cost to the individual, not building people up for a big come down in later life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that's mostly what the argument is about...how effective will a Mickey Mouse A-level be in gaining employment outside of McDonalds, when your nearest rivals for the same job will have genuine A-levels (and more likely university degrees) and far greater potential? How many people will a youth who's got a McDonalds qualification have to beat before he gets a better job outside of McDonalds?

We need more plumbers, electricians, brick layers, roofers...the incentive should be trying to get unskilled school leavers, who are likely to be working in McDonalds, into non-academic professions with good prospects at no cost to the individual, not building people up for a big come down in later life.

:yeahthat:

I completely agree, don't really need to add to that.

Apart from pointing out that my younger brother, who is an electrician/plumber earns over five times as much as I do as an English teacher.

His plumbing skills are also seriously taken advantage of, in his spare time, by both family and friends. Poor b*stard.

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I on't see the problem. From a business point of view, you have to admit that it makes sense, providing the person has some sort of managerial skills. Wasn't the qualification called Shift Management or something?

You liberals are always arguing about something...:)

The most heroic act is the one that no-one knows about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Communism makes sense!!!

Capitalism makes sense too doesn't it? One or a few individuals, taking the largest share of the money from a workforce that generates all the wealth for them? Perfect sense.

The Russians just took to the extremes, thats all!

One mentally unstable and evil Russian didn't take communism to an extreme, he took the constitutional power vested in his position to sabotage a paragon of near economic and political perfection in Leninism which had preceded him and control with wicked and unconditional hatred what had started out in 1917 as a good intention for a brilliant country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Capitalism makes sense too doesn't it? One or a few individuals, taking the largest share of the money from a workforce that generates all the wealth for them? Perfect sense.

True. Both Communism and Capitalism both make perfect sense in theory, don't tend to work very well in pratice though...

'To disagree with three-fourths of the British public is one of the first requisites of sanity'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True. Both Communism and Capitalism both make perfect sense in theory, don't tend to work very well in pratice though...

I was being sarcastic about the capitalism post. I don't think it does. The only reason it has won the hearts and minds of people in Europe and North America (and now China, India, Brazil and so on) is because its main principles of greed and selfishness play to the basic human driving factors. The others: anger, foolishness and egoism play to its political equivalent, conservatism, rather too well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • There was a time when everyone knew Zane Lowe or Annie Mac or Judge Jules or Dave Pearce or Annie Nightingale. Does the Radio 1 generation know the current bunch?
    • Looks like it's off to Preston! 
    • Would be nice to give more presence to the specialist shows over bank holidays. Surely the best way to promote new music credentials over anthems? As much as I accept it's very popular.
    • Peak radio 1 ! I agree with Bluestraw there was huge presence by specialist presenters then , certainly something I think radio1 could do more of now. Remember the takeover where specialist DJs would swap into main shows for a week? Or do we recall In New DJs We Trust, the competition on Chris moyles show where the winner would get a DJ set at radio 1s Ibiza weekend, and that is how Danny Howard’s radio career starters
    • Yeah. He started on R1 in the late 90's when they used do the 'Sessions in the Nations' where they used to split for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. He then moved to daytimes, firstly on weekends in 2003 then they replaced Mark & Lard on the mid afternoon slot in 2004.  Then he moved to late evenings as a specialist DJ.
    • Thanks for sharing that - I don't think I've seen it before. Didn't realise that Colin Murray off of Countdown and R5L used to be on R1! Several other current R2/R5L/R6M names there too.
    • 29th April has updated to show Dan back as presenter but still Nels in for Alyx on Introducing Rock.
    • Where do we think Radio 2 in the Park will be this year? Personally I'm thinking Swindon after Scott's clue of it having many roundabouts and since Big Weekend is at Luton I can't imagine they'd go to Milton Keynes.
    • Yeah, I feel like they need a big push on Jack to cement him in his new position. But it shouldn't just be Jack, you've got Sian and Alyx for instance, who are relatively new faces.
    • Now in it's third week, the new Capital Breakfast Show seems to be settling down well and there are more of the informal, random Jordan topics appearing.  Though it is clear he wants to be seen slightly differently. It really is a very decent listen.
    • Just watched that advert and it made me realise quite how many 'big' specialist presenters there were back then
    • I've been reminded of this Radio 1 cinema advert. I remember being so excited to see it. The In New Music We Trust era. Everything felt so cool, even if they had Westwood.  
    • Just Vick and Katie on Wednesday (and presumably Thursday as well).
    • Unless people can provide a source for this information then it should be treated as false.   Why would Jordan sign a contract with the BBC in the autumn when he agreed a deal with Global?  He could have left in August and not had to deal with the BBC.  Vick who doesn't really like Global why would she recommend him to go there and then warn him in her post to be careful?   It's been whispered from October that Roman was thinking of going.  Roman and Jordan have the same management team.  Why would they put Jordan in a place where he would have to battle with the BBC.  They could have agreed a deal with Global for Jordan in the summer.  They might have had to pay first couple months but they would do they to secure him.  If they had known about Roman wanting to leave they could have paid Roman off to get Jordan on air quicker.  Global would also not had legal around BBC contract to deal with and would not have had to pay the BBC to release Jordan.  None of what people say makes sense and if it did happen the way people say then BBC are not the stupid ones.  It really is not a good look to be talking with Global for 6 months, to then sign a contract with a the BBC, continue to talk to Global behind BBC's back after signing and then couple of months later want to leave and to throw a hissy fit as the BBC are not giving you what you want when you want it. That not a good light for Jordan or his management.   
    • Wow, surprised he signed a new contract in September but it says a lot about Jordan that he continued to a very high standard throughout last summer/autumn if this was all going on in the background. 
×
×
  • Create New...